Structural design of the dry fibrin sealant dressing and its impact on the hemostatic efficacy of the product.

We compared the hemostatic efficacy of a production version of a dry fibrin sealant dressing (DFSD) to a prototype that was previously successful in large animal studies. The results were used to improve manufacturing processes. Grade-V liver injuries were induced in swine and treated with gauze sponges (GAU), the prototype dressings (DFSD-1), or the scaled-up production version dressings (DFSD-2 in experiment 1 and DFSD-3 in experiment 2). Blood loss, hemostasis, resuscitation volume, and 60-min survival were quantified. In experiment 1, the DFSD-1 treatment reduced blood loss (p < 0.01), increased hemostasis at 4 min (p < 0.05), and improved survival (p < 0.05) compared with GAU. The DFSHD-2 decreased blood loss (p < 0.05) but did not increase hemostasis or survival significantly. Based on these results, manufacturing processes were altered, producing DFSD-3. In experiment 2, the DFSD-1 and DFSD-3 were equally effective in reducing blood loss (p < 0.01) and resuscitation volume (p < 0.05) compared with GAU. Hemostasis occurred more frequently in both the DFSD-1 and DFSD-3 groups (p < 0.01) compared with GAU. The structural design of DFSD-2 did not meet the efficacy requirement for release of the product. The subsequent change incorporated in DFSD-3 improved all hemostatic parameters of the dressings equal to those of the prototype product.

[1]  Peggy Hollingsworth-Fridlund,et al.  Original Scientific ArticlesLethal Injuries and Time to Death in a Level I Trauma Center 1 , 1998 .

[2]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Dry fibrin sealant dressings reduce blood loss, resuscitation volume, and improve survival in hypothermic coagulopathic swine with grade V liver injuries. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Does the absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage facilitate partial nephrectomy? , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[4]  R. Bellamy The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research. , 1984, Military medicine.

[5]  R. Lim,et al.  Efficacy of a fibrin hemostatic bandage in controlling hemorrhage from experimental arterial injuries. , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[6]  G Schlag,et al.  Fibrin sealant in orthopedic surgery. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  H. Redl,et al.  Methods of Fibrin Seal Application , 1982, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[8]  P Hollingsworth-Fridlund,et al.  The epidemiology of traumatic death. A population-based analysis. , 1993, Archives of surgery.

[9]  G. Rodeheaver,et al.  Modulation of mechanical properties in multiple-component tissue adhesives. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Efficacy of a dry fibrin sealant dressing for hemorrhage control after ballistic injury. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[11]  R. Cornum,et al.  Intraoperative use of the absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage: long term effects. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[12]  D. Harris,et al.  Autologous fibrin tissue adhesive: Factors influencing bonding power , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  P Hollingsworth-Fridlund,et al.  Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  R. Sataloff,et al.  Compatibility of autologous fibrin adhesive with implant materials. , 1988, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[15]  Richard A. Harris,et al.  Advanced hemostatic dressing development program: animal model selection criteria and results of a study of nine hemostatic dressings in a model of severe large venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in Swine. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  A. Carter,et al.  Hemostatic efficacy of a fibrin sealant-based topical agent in a femoral artery injury model: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[17]  J. Anema,et al.  Treatment of grade 4 renal stab wounds with absorbable fibrin adhesive bandage in a porcine model. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[18]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Comparison of 10 different hemostatic dressings in an aortic injury. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  J. Hermans,et al.  Fibrin: Structure and Interactions , 1982, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[20]  A. Sauaia,et al.  Epidemiology of Trauma Deaths , 1993 .

[21]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Effect of fibrin bandage fibrinogen concentration on blood loss after grade V liver injury in swine. , 2001, Military medicine.

[22]  S. Marshall Commercial fibrinogen, autogenous plasma, whole blood and cryoprecipitate for coagulum pyelolithotomy: a comparative study. , 1978, The Journal of urology.

[23]  D. M. Harris,et al.  Autologous fibrin tissue adhesive , 1985, The Laryngoscope.

[24]  F. Davey,et al.  Factors in the liquid portion of stored blood inhibit the proliferative response in mixed lymphocyte cultures , 1989, Transfusion.

[25]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Effect of dry fibrin sealant dressings versus gauze packing on blood loss in grade V liver injuries in resuscitated swine. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.