Electronic Patient-Reported Data Capture as a Foundation of Rapid Learning Cancer Care

Background:“Rapid learning healthcare” presents a new infrastructure to support comparative effectiveness research. By leveraging heterogeneous datasets (eg, clinical, administrative, genomic, registry, and research), health information technology, and sophisticated iterative analyses, rapid learning healthcare provides a real-time framework in which clinical studies can evaluate the relative impact of therapeutic approaches on a diverse array of measures. Purpose:This article describes an effort, at 1 academic medical center, to demonstrate what rapid learning healthcare might look like in operation. The article describes the process of developing and testing the components of this new model of integrated clinical/research function, with the pilot site being an academic oncology clinic and with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) being the foundational dataset. Research Design:Steps included: feasibility study of the ePRO system; validation study of ePRO collection across 3 cancers; linking ePRO and other datasets; implementation; stakeholder alignment and buy in, and; demonstration through use cases. Subjects:Two use cases are presented; participants were metastatic breast cancer (n = 65) and gastrointestinal cancer (n = 113) patients at 2 academic medical centers. Results:(1) Patient-reported symptom data were collected with tablet computers; patients with breast and gastrointestinal cancer indicated high levels of sexual distress, which prompted multidisciplinary response, design of an intervention, and successful application for funding to study the intervention's impact. (2) The system evaluated the longitudinal impact of a psychosocial care program provided to patients with breast cancer. Participants used tablet computers to complete PRO surveys; data indicated significant impact on psychosocial outcomes, notably distress and despair, despite advanced disease. Results return to the clinic, allowing iterative update and evaluation. Conclusions:An ePRO-based rapid learning cancer clinic is feasible, providing real-time research-quality data to support comparative effectiveness research.

[1]  Phase 2 pilot study of Pathfinders: a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[2]  D. Cella,et al.  Linking outcomes management to quality-of-life measurement. , 1997, Oncology.

[3]  L. Etheredge,et al.  A rapid-learning health system. , 2007, Health affairs.

[4]  R. Cicerone Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research , 2009 .

[5]  S. Barni,et al.  Sexual dysfunction in treated breast cancer patients. , 1997, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  D. Osoba,et al.  Quality of life in oncology practice: prognostic value of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in patients with advanced malignancy. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[7]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology. , 2009, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[8]  J. Slutsky,et al.  Moving closer to a rapid-learning health care system. , 2007, Health affairs.

[9]  M. Friedman,et al.  Sexual Dysfunction and Chronic Illness: The Role of Flexibility in Coping , 2006, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[10]  N. Adler,et al.  Cancer care for the whole patient : meeting psychosocial health needs , 2008 .

[11]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Quality management of potential chemotherapy-induced neutropenic complications: evaluation of practice in an academic medical center , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[12]  R. Willke,et al.  Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. , 2004, Controlled clinical trials.

[13]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data. , 2008, Health services research.

[15]  S. Hendren,et al.  Prevalence of Male and Female Sexual Dysfunction Is High Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site , 2001, Psycho-oncology.

[17]  L. Schover,et al.  Sexual dysfunction and treatment for early stage cervical cancer , 1989, Cancer.

[18]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  P. Maurette,et al.  [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[20]  D. Osoba,et al.  Quality of life scores: An independent prognostic variable in a general population of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy , 2004, Quality of Life Research.