The nearly universal merger rate of dark matter haloes in ΛCDM cosmology

We construct merger trees from the largest data base of dark matter haloes to date provided by the Millennium Simulation to quantify the merger rates of haloes over a broad range of descendant halo mass (10 12 ≤ M 0 ≤ 1015 M ⊙ ), progenitor mass ratio (10 -3 ≤ ξ ≤ 1), and redshift (0 ≤ z ≤ 6). We find the mean merger rate per halo, Bin, to have very simple dependence on M 0 , ξ, and z, and propose a universal fitting form for B/n that is accurate to 10-20 per cent. Overall, B/n depends very weakly on the halo mass (oc M 0 0 .08) and scales as a power law in the progenitor mass ratio (oc ξ -2 ) for minor mergers (ξ ≤ 0.1) with a mild upturn for major mergers. As a function of time, we find the merger rate per Gyr to evolve roughly as (1 + z) nm with r m = 2-2.3, while the rate per unit redshift is nearly independent of z. Several tests are performed to assess how our merger rates are affected by e.g. the time interval between Millennium outputs, binary versus multiple progenitor mergers, and mass conservation and diffuse accretion during mergers. In particular, we find halo fragmentations to be a general issue in merger tree construction from N-body simulations and compare two methods for handling these events. We compare our results with predictions of two analytical models for halo mergers based on the extended Press-Schechter (EPS) model and the coagulation theory. We find that the EPS model overpredicts the major merger rates and underpredicts the minor merger rates by up to a factor of a few.

[1]  PROBING THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY INTERACTION/MERGER RATE USING COLLISIONAL RING GALAXIES , 2004, astro-ph/0405128.

[2]  G. Efstathiou,et al.  The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter , 1985 .

[3]  Wayne Hu,et al.  Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants , 1997, astro-ph/9710252.

[4]  Y. Jing,et al.  Semianalytical Model of Galaxy Formation with High-Resolution N-Body Simulations , 2004, astro-ph/0408475.

[5]  Puragra Guhathakurta,et al.  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Evolution of Close Galaxy Pairs and Major-Merger Rates up to z ~ 1.2 , 2004, astro-ph/0411104.

[6]  W. Keel,et al.  Evidence for Evolution in the Galaxy Merger Rate , 1994 .

[7]  C. Baugh,et al.  Hierarchical galaxy formation , 2000, astro-ph/0007281.

[8]  E. Quataert,et al.  Dynamical friction and galaxy merging time-scales , 2007, 0707.2960.

[9]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The formation and evolution of galaxies within merging dark matter haloes , 1993 .

[10]  The nature of galaxy bias and clustering , 1999, astro-ph/9903343.

[11]  J. Peacock,et al.  Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars , 2005, Nature.

[12]  S. Cole,et al.  Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation , 1993 .

[13]  R. Davé,et al.  Galaxy Merger Statistics and Inferred Bulge-to-Disk Ratios in Cosmological SPH Simulations , 2005, astro-ph/0509474.

[14]  Martin White The Mass of a halo , 2001 .

[15]  M. Fukugita,et al.  A Slow Merger History of Field Galaxies since z ~ 1 , 2003, astro-ph/0312222.

[16]  Oxford,et al.  Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation , 2005, astro-ph/0511338.

[17]  Galaxy formation using halo merger histories taken from N‐body simulations , 2002, astro-ph/0210141.

[18]  U. California,et al.  Semi-analytic modelling of galaxy formation: The local Universe , 1998, astro-ph/9802268.

[19]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations , 1991 .

[20]  Carlberg,et al.  A survey of faint galaxy pairs , 1994, astro-ph/9401051.

[21]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the CFRS and LDSS redshift surveys—IV. Influence of mergers in the evolution of faint field galaxies from z∼1 , 1999, astro-ph/9909211.

[22]  On the Origin of Early-Type Galaxies and the Evolution of the Interaction Rate in the Field , 1997, astro-ph/9710140.

[23]  R. Carlberg,et al.  Close Pairs of Field Galaxies in the CNOC1 Redshift Survey , 1996, astro-ph/9608016.

[24]  Padova,et al.  Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0 , 2000, astro-ph/0012055.

[25]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The formation history of elliptical galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0509725.

[26]  Close Galaxy Counts as a Probe of Hierarchical Structure Formation , 2006, astro-ph/0604506.

[27]  E. Ellingson,et al.  Statistics of close galaxy pairs from a faint-galaxy redshift survey , 1995 .

[28]  R. Sheth,et al.  An excursion set model of hierarchical clustering: ellipsoidal collapse and the moving barrier , 2001, astro-ph/0105113.

[29]  Self-consistent theory of halo mergers , 2004, astro-ph/0407136.

[30]  Dynamically close galaxy pairs and merger rate evolution in the cnoc2 redshift survey , 2001, astro-ph/0109428.

[31]  A. Klypin,et al.  Merging History as a Function of Halo Environment , 2000, astro-ph/0004132.

[32]  A marked correlation function analysis of halo formation times in the Millennium Simulation , 2005, astro-ph/0510488.

[33]  The growth of galaxies in cosmological simulations of structure formation , 2001, astro-ph/0106282.

[34]  Guinevere Kauffmann,et al.  Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe - I. Methods and results at z=0 , 1999 .

[35]  H. M. P. Couchman,et al.  The mass function of dark matter haloes , 2000, astro-ph/0005260.

[36]  Casey Papovich,et al.  A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3 , 2003 .