The Management of Resources

This article contributes to the understanding of competitive dynamics and resource management by studying empirically the element of time in the relationship between resource management actions and firm performance. It shows that four types of actions identified on the basis of the literature on competitive dynamics and resource management, namely, actions to structure, bundle, and leverage resources in product and regulatory arenas, differ in the time they take to positively affect firm performance, in the persistence of this positive impact, and in their total impact on performance over time. Better understanding of the temporal dimension of the action–performance relationship is important for theory and practice. On the theory side, time is a dimension of competitive strategy that has long been argued to be important but that is often neglected by researchers. In particular, existing theories in competitive strategy offer very few arguments that can be used to predict the timing of the impact of firm actions on performance. Regarding practice, managers need to know which actions can improve their firm performance in the short, medium, or long term and how sustainable the improvement is likely to be.

[1]  Xiaoming He,et al.  Firm resources, competitive actions and performance: investigating a mediated model with evidence from the in‐vitro diagnostics industry , 2011 .

[2]  P. Barr,et al.  The influence of executive cognition on competitive dynamics , 2011 .

[3]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The age of temporary advantage , 2010 .

[4]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[5]  J. Walters Challenges for future research , 2010 .

[6]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Contingencies within Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Interdependent Effects of Resource Investment and Deployment on Firm Performance , 2009 .

[7]  A. MacEachern An Introduction, In Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[8]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Making the Most of What You've Got: Managerial Ability as a Source of Resource Value Creation , 2008 .

[9]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Resource Management in Dyadic Competitive Rivalry: The Effects of Resource Bundling and Deployment , 2008 .

[10]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[11]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions And Firm Performance , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas P. Moliterno,et al.  Firm Performance, Rent Appropriation, and the Strategic Resource Divestment Capability , 2007 .

[13]  Olivier Chatain,et al.  Competitors' Resource-Oriented Strategies: Acting Upon Competitors' Resources Through Interventions in Factor Markets and Political Markets , 2007 .

[14]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Creating Value in the Face of Declining Performance: Firm Strategies and Organizational Recovery , 2007 .

[15]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[16]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[17]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The impact of market actions on firm reputation , 2006 .

[18]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms' financial performance? , 2005 .

[19]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Strategy As Action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[20]  C. Reese,et al.  A Bayesian operationalization of the resource‐based view , 2004 .

[21]  Pek-Hooi Soh,et al.  Dynamic Inducements in R&D Investment: Market Signals and Network Locations , 2004 .

[22]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  Competitive repertoire simplicity and firm performance: The moderating role of top management team heterogeneity , 2004 .

[23]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Edith Penrose's (1959) Contributions to the Resource‐based View of Strategic Management , 2004 .

[24]  H. Greve A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[25]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[26]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[27]  Richard Makadok,et al.  Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts , 2003 .

[28]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms , 2003 .

[29]  M. Hitt,et al.  The Essence of Strategic Leadership: Managing Human and Social Capital , 2002 .

[30]  A. Rugman,et al.  Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management , 2002 .

[31]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Raising Rivals' Costs Through Political Strategy: An Extension of Resource-based Theory , 2002 .

[32]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: a reconciliation of conflicting views , 2002 .

[33]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  The role of irreversibilities in competitive interaction: behavioral considerations from organization theory , 2002 .

[34]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[35]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS RESEARCH: CRITIQUE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2002 .

[36]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis , 2001 .

[37]  Walter J. Ferrier Navigating the Competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of Competitive Aggressiveness , 2001 .

[38]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[39]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[40]  A. King,et al.  Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox , 2001 .

[41]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[42]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[43]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change , 2000 .

[44]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .

[45]  Kerry Patterson,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Econometrics: A Time Series Approach , 2000 .

[46]  C. Grimm,et al.  Firm Level Performance Implications of Nonmarket Actions , 2000 .

[47]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[48]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation , 2000 .

[49]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[50]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Markets, Firms, and the Process of Economic Development , 1999 .

[51]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[52]  S. Majumdar On the utilization of resources: perspectives from the U.S. telecommunications industry , 1998 .

[53]  David P. Baron,et al.  Integrated Strategy, Trade Policy, and Global Competition , 1997 .

[54]  Mark D. Choudhari The dynamics of competitive strategy , 1997 .

[55]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  “Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance , 1996 .

[56]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[57]  Max Chen Competitor analysis and interfirm riva-lry: toward a theoretical integration , 1996 .

[58]  B. Shaffer Firm-level Responses to Government Regulation: Theoretical and Research Approaches , 1995 .

[59]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The management of resources and the resource of management , 1995 .

[60]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[61]  W. Evans,et al.  Living by the “Golden Rule”: Multimarket Contact in the U. S. Airline Industry , 1994 .

[62]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[63]  David J. Miller,et al.  Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework , 1994 .

[64]  R. Rust,et al.  Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications , 1994 .

[65]  Danny Miller,et al.  THE SIMPLICITY OF COMPETITIVE REPERTOIRES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. , 1993 .

[66]  Elaine Mosakowski,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on the Dynamic Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Empirical Examination of the Focus and Differentiation Strategies in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1993 .

[67]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[68]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[69]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  The Profitability of Innovating Firms , 1993 .

[70]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[71]  Andreas Antoniou,et al.  THE FACTORS DETERMINING THE PROFITABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES: SOME ECONOMETRIC RESULTS. , 1992 .

[72]  Stephen J. K. Walters Enterprise, Government, and the Public , 1992 .

[73]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility , 1992 .

[74]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Aspiration Level Adaptation: An Empirical Exploration , 1992 .

[75]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses , 1992 .

[76]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[77]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[78]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[79]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Managerial Resources and Rents , 1991 .

[80]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[81]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[82]  E. Ziegel Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1989 .

[83]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Predictors of response time to competitive strategic actions: Preliminary theory and evidence , 1989 .

[84]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[85]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[86]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Competitors' responses to easily imitated new products—exploring commercial banking product introductions , 1985 .

[87]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[88]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[89]  R. Rumelt Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[90]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[91]  J. March Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[92]  Israel M. Kirzner Perception, opportunity, and profit , 1979 .

[93]  W. C. Fife,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES , 1973 .

[94]  C. F. Phillips Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[95]  A. Kahn,et al.  The economics of regulation , 1970 .

[96]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[97]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[98]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .