Percutaneous Image-Guided Vertebral Fixation in Cancer-Related Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Case Series Study

Background and objectives: Cancer-related vertebral compression fractures (VCF) may cause debilitating back pain and instability, affecting the quality of life of cancer patients. To further drive cement deposition during vertebroplasty, the aims of this restrospective case series study were to report the feasibility, safety and short term efficacy (≤6 months) of percutaneous vertebral fixation in cancer-related vertebral compression fractures using various intravertebral implants. Methods: All consecutive cancer patients treated with percutaneous vertebral fixation for VCF were retrospectively included. Various devices were inserted percutaneously under image guidance and filled by cement. Descriptive statistics were used and a matched paired analysis of pain scores was performed to assess for changes following interventions. Results: A total of 18 consecutive patients (12 women (66.6%) and 6 men (33.3%); mean age 59.7 ± 15.5 years) were included. A total of 42 devices were inserted in 8 thoracic and 16 lumbar vertebrae. Visual analogue scale measurement significantly improved from 5.6 ± 1.8 preoperatively to 1.5 ± 1.7 at 1 week (p < 0.01) and to 1.5 ± 1.3 at 6 months (p < 0.01). No severe adverse events were observed, but three adjacent fractures occurred between 1 week and 5 months after implantation. Conclusions: Percutaneous vertebral fixation of cancer-related VCF is feasible and safe and allows pain relief.

[1]  Z. McCormick,et al.  Vertebral Augmentation of Cancer-Related Spinal Compression Fractures , 2021, Spine.

[2]  F. Cornelis,et al.  Ergonomics in Interventional Radiology: Awareness Is Mandatory , 2021, Medicina.

[3]  T. de Baère,et al.  Percutaneous Transpedicular Fixation by PEEK Polymer Implants Combined with Cementoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Pilot Study , 2021, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.

[4]  S. Chevret,et al.  Hip Fracture Prevention in Osteoporotic Elderly and Cancer Patients: An On-Line French Survey Evaluating Current Needs , 2020, Medicina.

[5]  J. Lotz,et al.  Integrative Medicine in Interventional Oncology: A Virtuous Alliance , 2020, Medicina.

[6]  S. Chevret,et al.  Prevention of Pathological Fracture of the Proximal Femur: A Systematic Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Image-Guided Techniques Used in Interventional Oncology , 2019, Medicina.

[7]  F. Cornelis,et al.  Sedation and analgesia in interventional radiology: Where do we stand, where are we heading and why does it matter? , 2019, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[8]  B. Kastler,et al.  Innovative Spine Implants for Improved Augmentation and Stability in Neoplastic Vertebral Compression Fracture , 2019, Medicina.

[9]  F. Cornelis,et al.  Interventional oncologic procedures for pain palliation. , 2019, Presse medicale.

[10]  H. Wilke,et al.  Comparative biomechanical study of a new transpedicular vertebral device and vertebroplasty for the treatment or prevention of vertebral compression fractures , 2018, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  J. Chiras,et al.  Vertebral augmentation with the SpineJack® in chronic vertebral compression fractures with major kyphosis , 2018, European Radiology.

[12]  D. Filippiadis,et al.  New Implant-Based Technologies in the Spine , 2018, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[13]  F. Cornelis,et al.  Metastatic Osseous Pain Control: Bone Ablation and Cementoplasty , 2017, Seminars in Interventional Radiology.

[14]  P. Pereira,et al.  Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System , 2017, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[15]  J. Beregi,et al.  Patient dose in interventional radiology: a multicentre study of the most frequent procedures in France , 2017, European Radiology.

[16]  A. Gangi,et al.  CIRSE Guidelines on Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation , 2017, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[17]  F. Cornelis,et al.  Percutaneous low-pressure bone stenting to control cement deposition in extensive lytic lesions , 2017, European Radiology.

[18]  C. Renaud Treatment of vertebral compression fractures with the cranio-caudal expandable implant SpineJack®: Technical note and outcomes in 77 consecutive patients. , 2015, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[19]  D. Filippiadis,et al.  Interventional Procedures of the Spine , 2014, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.

[20]  P. Brown,et al.  Vertebral compression fracture after spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: a multi-institutional analysis with a focus on radiation dose and the spinal instability neoplastic score. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  F. Montemurro,et al.  Percutaneous vertebral augmentation assisted by PEEK implant in painful osteolytic vertebral metastasis involving the vertebral wall: experience on 40 patients. , 2013, Pain physician.

[22]  R. Riesenburger A Novel Classification System for Spinal Instability in Neoplastic Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach and Expert Consensus From the Spine Oncology Study Group , 2011 .

[23]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice. , 2009, Radiology.