Two-dimensional Co-Seismic Surface Displacements Field of the Chi-Chi Earthquake Inferred from SAR Image Matching

The Mw=7.6 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan occurred in 1999 over the Chelungpu fault and caused a great surface rupture and severe damage. Differential Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (DInSAR) has been applied previously to study the co-seismic ground displacements. There have however been significant limitations in the studies. First, only one-dimensional displacements along the Line-of-Sight (LOS) direction have been measured. The large horizontal displacements along the Chelungpu fault are largely missing from the measurements as the fault is nearly perpendicular to the LOS direction. Second, due to severe signal decorrelation on the hangling wall of the fault, the displacements in that area are un-measurable by differential InSAR method. We estimate the co-seismic displacements in both the azimuth and range directions with the method of SAR amplitude image matching. GPS observations at the 10 GPS stations are used to correct for the orbital ramp in the amplitude matching and to create the two-dimensional (2D) co-seismic surface displacements field using the descending ERS-2 SAR image pair. The results show that the co-seismic displacements range from about -2.0 m to 0.7 m in the azimuth direction (with the positive direction pointing to the flight direction), with the footwall side of the fault moving mainly southwards and the hanging wall side northwards. The displacements in the LOS direction range from about -0.5 m to 1.0 m, with the largest displacement occuring in the northeastern part of the hanging wall (the positive direction points to the satellite from ground). Comparing the results from amplitude matching with those from DInSAR, we can see that while only a very small fraction of the LOS displacement has been recovered by the DInSAR mehtod, the azimuth displacements cannot be well detected with the DInSAR measurements as they are almost perpendicular to the LOS. Therefore, the amplitude matching method is obviously more advantageous than the DInSAR in studying the Chi-Chi earthquake. Another advantage of the method is that the displacement in the hanging wall of the fault that is un-measurable with DInSAR due to severe signal decorrelation can almost completely retrieved in this research. This makes the whole co-seismic displacements field clearly visible and the location of the rupture identifiable. Using displacements measured at 15 independent GPS stations for validation, we found that the RMS values of the differences between the two types of results were 6.9 cm and 5.7 cm respectively in the azimuth and the range directions.

[1]  R. Bamler,et al.  Phase statistics of interferograms with applications to synthetic aperture radar. , 1994, Applied optics.

[2]  P. Visser,et al.  Precise orbit determination and gravity field improvement for the ERS satellites , 1998 .

[3]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring near field coseismic displacements from SAR images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[4]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring ground displacements from SAR amplitude images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[5]  GAMMA SAR AND INTERFEROMETRIC PROCESSING SOFTWARE , 2000 .

[6]  T. Farr,et al.  Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data , 2000 .

[7]  Yuzo Suga,et al.  Application of ERS-2/SAR data for the 1999 Taiwan earthquake , 2001 .

[8]  Paul A. Rosen,et al.  3-D surface deformation of the 2000 Usu Eruption measured by matching of SAR images , 2001 .

[9]  Grant T. Liu,et al.  Crustal Deformation Mapping with Satellite SAR Interferometry: Applied to 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake , 2002 .

[10]  Chung-Pai Chang,et al.  Application of SAR interferometry to a large thrust deformation: the 1999 Mw = 7.6 Chichi earthquake in central Taiwan , 2002 .

[11]  L. Rivera,et al.  Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations , 2002 .

[12]  Rémi Michel,et al.  Horizontal coseismic deformation of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake measured from SPOT satellite images: Implications for the seismic cycle along the western foothills of central Taiwan , 2003 .

[13]  Chung-Pai Chang,et al.  Coseismic displacements of the footwall of the Chelungpu fault caused by the 1999, Taiwan, Chi-Chi earthquake from InSAR and GPS data , 2003 .

[14]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Preseismic deformation and coseismic displacements associated With the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[15]  Z. W. Li,et al.  Pre- and co-seismic ground deformations of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake, measured with SAR interferometry , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[16]  U. Wegmuller,et al.  Precision estimation of local offsets between pairs of SAR SLCs and detected SAR images , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[17]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Three-dimensional deformation caused by the Bam, Iran, earthquake and the origin of shallow slip deficit , 2005, Nature.

[18]  Chunlin Huang,et al.  Filtering method for SAR interferograms with strong noise , 2006 .

[19]  H. Zebker,et al.  Measuring two‐dimensional movements using a single InSAR pair , 2006 .

[20]  Caijun Xu,et al.  3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery , 2007 .

[21]  Kenneth C. Jezek,et al.  Simultaneous Least Squares Adjustment of Multiframe Velocities Derived From Interferometric and Speckle-Tracking Methods , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[22]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Determining fault slip distribution of the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake with GPS and InSAR data using triangular dislocation elements , 2008 .

[23]  Sylvain Barbot,et al.  Space geodetic investigation of the coseismic and postseismic deformation due to the 2003 Mw7.2 Altai earthquake: Implications for the local lithospheric rheology , 2008 .