Guiding locomotion in complex, dynamic environments

Locomotion in complex, dynamic environments is an integral part of many daily activities, including walking in crowded spaces, driving on busy roadways, and playing sports. Many of the tasks that humans perform in such environments involve interactions with moving objects—that is, they require people to coordinate their own movement with the movements of other objects. A widely adopted framework for research on the detection, avoidance, and interception of moving objects is the bearing angle model, according to which observers move so as to keep the bearing angle of the object constant for interception and varying for obstacle avoidance. The bearing angle model offers a simple, parsimonious account of visual control but has several significant limitations and does not easily scale up to more complex tasks. In this paper, I introduce an alternative account of how humans choose actions and guide locomotion in the presence of moving objects. I show how the new approach addresses the limitations of the bearing angle model and accounts for a variety of behaviors involving moving objects, including (1) choosing whether to pass in front of or behind a moving obstacle, (2) perceiving whether a gap between a pair of moving obstacles is passable, (3) avoiding a collision while passing through single or multiple lanes of traffic, (4) coordinating speed and direction of locomotion during interception, (5) simultaneously intercepting a moving target while avoiding a stationary or moving obstacle, and (6) knowing whether to abandon the chase of a moving target. I also summarize data from recent studies that support the new approach.

[1]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Review article Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion , 1997 .

[3]  M. Turvey,et al.  Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. , 2009 .

[4]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[5]  B S Lanchester,et al.  Pursuit and prediction in the tracking of moving food by a teleost fish (Acanthaluteres spilomelanurus). , 1975, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Visual and non-visual contributions to perception of object movement during observer movement , 2012 .

[7]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[9]  S. Rushton,et al.  Moving observers, relative retinal motion and the detection of object movement , 2005, Current Biology.

[10]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception I: operative optical variables, attunement, and calibration. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances. , 2011, Human movement science.

[13]  M. Lenoir,et al.  Intercepting moving objects during self-motion: effects of environmental changes. , 1999, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Melissa S Parade,et al.  Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[17]  Reinoud J Bootsma,et al.  Global and Local Contributions to the Optical Specification of Time to Contact: Observer Sensitivity to Composite Tau , 2002, Perception.

[18]  Finnegan J. Calabro,et al.  Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  S. Rushton,et al.  Optic Flow Processing for the Assessment of Object Movement during Ego Movement , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Intersection crossing considered as intercepting a moving traffic gap: effects of task and environmental constraints. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[21]  Cynthia F Moss,et al.  Echolocating Bats Use a Nearly Time-Optimal Strategy to Intercept Prey , 2006, PLoS biology.

[22]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Benjamin J Chihak,et al.  Perceiving and acting on complex affordances: how children and adults bicycle across two lanes of opposing traffic. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Bastin,et al.  Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Human Movement Science.

[26]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Affordance-Based Control of Visually Guided Action , 2007 .

[27]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Vestibular Facilitation of Optic Flow Parsing , 2010, PloS one.

[28]  D. N. Lee The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Perceiving Possibilities for Action: On the Necessity of Calibration and Perceptual Learning for the Visual Guidance of Action , 2005, Perception.

[32]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Direct perception of action-scaled affordances: the shrinking gap problem. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Thomas B. Gregory,et al.  How Football Players Determine where to Run to Tackle other Players: A Mathematical and Psychological Description and Analysis , 2009 .

[35]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Synchronizing self and object movement: how child and adult cyclists intercept moving gaps in a virtual environment. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J.,et al.  Optic Flow , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[37]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  A cortical architecture on parallel hardware for motion processing in real time. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[38]  Simon K Rushton,et al.  Perception of object trajectory: parsing retinal motion into self and object movement components. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[39]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Intercepting moving targets: a little foresight helps a lot , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Multimodal Coding of Three-Dimensional Rotation and Translation in Area MSTd: Comparison of Visual and Vestibular Selectivity , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Visual and Non-Visual Contributions to the Perception of Object Motion during Self-Motion , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  Rui Ni,et al.  Detection of collision events on curved trajectories: Optical information from invariant rate-of-bearing change , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  William H. Warren,et al.  Combining moving targets and moving obstacles in a locomotion model , 2010 .

[45]  Geert J P Savelsbergh,et al.  Rate of Change of Angular Bearing as the Relevant Property in a Horizontal Interception Task During Locomotion , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .

[48]  William H. Warren,et al.  7 Action-Scaled Information for the Visual Control of Locomotion , 2006 .

[49]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  How We Avoid Collisions With Stationary and Moving Obstacles , 2004 .

[50]  L. M. Vaina,et al.  Interaction of cortical networks mediating object motion detection by moving observers , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Lee Dn,et al.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980 .

[52]  Hiroshi Ando,et al.  World-centered perception of 3D object motion during visually guided self-motion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[53]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.

[54]  Laurence R Harris,et al.  The influence of retinal and extra-retinal motion cues on perceived object motion during self-motion. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[55]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Intercepting a moving traffic gap while avoiding collision with lead and trail vehicles: gap-related and boundary-related influences on drivers' speed regulations during approach to an intersection. , 2012, Human movement science.

[56]  M. Wraga,et al.  The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and object dimensions , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.