Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: validation of weak lensing cluster member contamination estimates from P(z) decomposition

Weak lensing source galaxy catalogues used in estimating the masses of galaxy clusters can be heavily contaminated by cluster members, prohibiting accurate mass calibration. In this study, we test the performance of an estimator for the extent of cluster member contamination based on decomposing the photometric redshift P(z) of source galaxies into contaminating and background components. We perform a full scale mock analysis on a simulated sky survey approximately mirroring the observational properties of the Dark Energy Survey Year One observations (DES Y1), and find excellent agreement between the true number profile of contaminating cluster member galaxies in the simulation and the estimated one. We further apply the method to estimate the cluster member contamination for the DES Y1 redMaPPer cluster mass calibration analysis, and compare the results to an alternative approach based on the angular correlation of weak lensing source galaxies. We find indications that the correlation based estimates are biased by the selection of the weak lensing sources in the cluster vicinity, which does not strongly impact the P(z) decomposition method. Collectively, these benchmarks demonstrate the strength of the P(z) decomposition method in alleviating membership contamination and enabling highly accurate cluster weak lensing studies without broad exclusion of source galaxies, thereby improving the total constraining power of cluster mass calibration via weak lensing.

[1]  P. Chandra,et al.  Evolution of the Progenitors of SNe 1993J and 2011dh Revealed through Late-time Radio and X-Ray Studies , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  A R Walker,et al.  Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[3]  D. Gerdes,et al.  Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the effect of intracluster light on photometric redshifts for weak gravitational lensing , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[4]  C. B. D'Andrea,et al.  Weak-lensing analysis of SPT-selected galaxy clusters using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[5]  H. Wollnik,et al.  Improving wide-band mass measurements in a multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph by usage of a concomitant measurement scheme , 2018, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

[6]  R. C. Smith,et al.  Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[7]  D. Gerdes,et al.  DES Y1 Results: validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[8]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect and X-ray scaling relations from weak lensing mass calibration of 32 South Pole Telescope selected galaxy clusters , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  D. Gerdes,et al.  The Splashback Feature around DES Galaxy Clusters: Galaxy Density and Weak Lensing Profiles , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.

[10]  C. B. D'Andrea,et al.  Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[11]  B. Yanny,et al.  Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing , 2017, Physical Review D.

[12]  N. E. Sommer,et al.  Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[13]  B. Yanny,et al.  Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology , 2017, 1708.01531.

[14]  D. Spergel,et al.  Planck Sunyaev–Zel’dovich cluster mass calibration using Hyper Suprime-Cam weak lensing , 2017, 1706.00434.

[15]  Satoshi Miyazaki,et al.  The first-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey , 2017, 1705.06745.

[16]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Cluster mass calibration at high redshift: HST weak lensing analysis of 13 distant galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Survey , 2016, 1611.03866.

[17]  Alberto Accomazzi,et al.  New ADS Functionality for the Curator , 2017, ArXiv.

[18]  S. More,et al.  Constraints on the Mass–Richness Relation from the Abundance and Weak Lensing of SDSS Clusters , 2017, 1707.01907.

[19]  A. Leauthaud,et al.  Source Selection for Cluster Weak Lensing Measurements in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey , 2017, 1706.00427.

[20]  Yen-Chi Chen,et al.  Intrinsic alignment in redMaPPer clusters – II. Radial alignment of satellites towards cluster centres , 2017, 1704.06273.

[21]  Satoshi Miyazaki,et al.  Photometric Redshifts for Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Data Release 1 , 2017, 1704.05988.

[22]  A. K. Inoue,et al.  The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and Survey Design , 2017, 1704.05858.

[23]  Erin S. Sheldon,et al.  Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration , 2017, 1702.02601.

[24]  Maria E. S. Pereira,et al.  Lensing is Low: Cosmology, Galaxy Formation, or New Physics? , 2016, 1611.08606.

[25]  R. Nichol,et al.  Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data , 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[26]  D. Gruen,et al.  Selection biases in empirical p(z) methods for weak lensing , 2016, 1610.01160.

[27]  P. Schneider,et al.  KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing , 2016, 1606.05338.

[28]  E. Rykoff,et al.  Weak Lensing Measurement of the Mass--Richness Relation of SDSS redMaPPer Clusters , 2016, 1603.06953.

[29]  R. Mandelbaum,et al.  Weak lensing calibration of mass bias in the REFLEX+BCS X-ray galaxy cluster catalogue , 2015, 1502.01024.

[30]  M. Bartelmann,et al.  Weak gravitational lensing , 2016, Scholarpedia.

[31]  Scott Dodelson,et al.  Cosmic Visions Dark Energy: Science , 2016, 1604.07626.

[32]  R. Nichol,et al.  THE REDMAPPER GALAXY CLUSTER CATALOG FROM DES SCIENCE VERIFICATION DATA , 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[33]  C. B. D'Andrea,et al.  No Galaxy Left Behind: Accurate Measurements with the Faintest Objects in the Dark Energy Survey , 2015, 1507.08336.

[34]  C. B. D'Andrea,et al.  Redshift distributions of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification shear catalogue and implications for weak lensing , 2015, Physical Review D.

[35]  N. Okabe,et al.  LoCuSS: weak-lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters , 2015, 1507.04493.

[36]  Samuel W. Skillman,et al.  THE CONCENTRATION DEPENDENCE OF THE GALAXY–HALO CONNECTION: MODELING ASSEMBLY BIAS WITH ABUNDANCE MATCHING , 2015, 1510.05651.

[37]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  Weak-lensing mass calibration of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope equatorial Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster sample with the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope stripe 82 survey , 2015, 1509.08930.

[38]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses , 2015, 1502.01883.

[39]  Heidelberg,et al.  Weighing the giants – IV. Cosmology and neutrino mass , 2014, 1407.4516.

[40]  E. Bertin,et al.  MODELING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY , 2014, 1411.0032.

[41]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  GALAXY CLUSTERS DISCOVERED VIA THE SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT IN THE 2500-SQUARE-DEGREE SPT-SZ SURVEY , 2014, 1409.0850.

[42]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Constraints on the Alignment of Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters from $\sim$14,000 Spectroscopic Members , 2014, 1406.5196.

[43]  Bonn,et al.  Robust weak-lensing mass calibration of Planck galaxy clusters , 2014, 1402.2670.

[44]  J. Koppenhoefer,et al.  Weak lensing analysis of SZ-selected clusters of galaxies from the SPT and Planck surveys , 2013, 1310.6744.

[45]  A. Finoguenov,et al.  redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG , 2013, 1303.3562.

[46]  D. Burke,et al.  Weighing the Giants – III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing masses , 2012, 1208.0605.

[47]  Caltech,et al.  Weighing the Giants – II. Improved calibration of photometry from stellar colours and accurate photometric redshifts , 2012, 1208.0602.

[48]  R. Blandford,et al.  Weighing the Giants - I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images , 2012, 1208.0597.

[49]  J. Tinker,et al.  THE CONNECTION BETWEEN GALAXIES AND DARK MATTER STRUCTURES IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE , 2012, 1207.2160.

[50]  Adam G. Riess,et al.  Observational probes of cosmic acceleration , 2012, 1201.2434.

[51]  Sergey E. Koposov,et al.  The radial distribution of galaxies in groups and clusters , 2012, 1201.5491.

[52]  August E. Evrard,et al.  Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters , 2011, 1103.4829.

[53]  Jeffrey M. Kubo,et al.  INTRINSIC ALIGNMENT OF CLUSTER GALAXIES: THE REDSHIFT EVOLUTION , 2011, The Astrophysical Journal.

[54]  Alison L. Coil,et al.  THE DEEP3 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: KECK/DEIMOS SPECTROSCOPY IN THE GOODS-N FIELD , 2011, 1101.4018.

[55]  IfA,et al.  The Observed Growth of Massive Galaxy Clusters I: Statistical Methods and Cosmological Constraints , 2009, 0909.3098.

[56]  R. Wechsler,et al.  THE GALAXY CONTENT OF SDSS CLUSTERS AND GROUPS , 2007, 0710.3780.

[57]  E. Rozo,et al.  MaxBCG: A Red-Sequence Galaxy Cluster Finder , 2007, astro-ph/0701268.

[58]  M. Crocce,et al.  Transients from initial conditions in cosmological simulations , 2006, astro-ph/0606505.

[59]  R. Bouwens,et al.  Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology , 2006, astro-ph/0605262.

[60]  R. Wechsler,et al.  Modeling Luminosity-dependent Galaxy Clustering through Cosmic Time , 2005, astro-ph/0512234.

[61]  V. Springel The Cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 , 2005, astro-ph/0505010.

[62]  A. Connolly,et al.  The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0312036.

[63]  N. Benı́tez Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation , 1998, astro-ph/9811189.

[64]  S. White,et al.  The Structure of cold dark matter halos , 1995, astro-ph/9508025.

[65]  A. Szalay,et al.  Bias and variance of angular correlation functions , 1993 .

[66]  J. Trümper ROSAT--A New Look at the X-ray Sky. , 1993, Science.

[67]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[68]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[69]  A. Oemler,et al.  Evolution of galaxies in clusters. I. ISIT photometry of Cl 0024 + 1654 and 3C 295 , 1978 .