Scale dependency of insect assemblages in response to landscape pattern

Patches and their boundaries are sensitive to the scale at which they are viewed. The response of species to patchiness may depend on the resolution and on the extent by which the spatial pattern is perceived. The goal of this paper is to identify the scale at which forest spatial pattern causes changes in species richness and abundances of Dipteran and Homopteran species as a whole, and further on their distinctive ecological functional groups. Using remotely-sensed optical imagery, we described the landscape structure surrounding sampling sites. We used two approaches to deal with the problem of the scale of observation: 1) variation of extent using a multiscale analysis, and 2) comparison of two satellite sensors with different spatial resolutions (SPOT: 20 × 20 m, and Landsat TM: 30 × 30 m). The relationship between entomological data and landscape descriptors at different spatial scales was tested with the Mantel test, redundancy analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression. Relative abundances of Homopteran species were affected by landscape patterns at finer scales than in Diptera. The strength of response to landscape was different for each Dipteran functional group. The multiscale analysis also enabled the optimal scale (6.25 ha) of landscape pattern, accounting for 62% of the variation in Homopteran richness, to be identified. As a practical application, Homopteran richness was mapped by extrapolation of the regression function to the pixels of the image. Multiscale analysis provides an alternative view of fragmentation effects, which are traditionally studied through the patch-based approach, and highlights the importance of scale in ecological processes. The detection of optimal scales and the use of satellite images enable maps of important biotic indicators to be drawn up.

[1]  O. D. Bolós,et al.  Observations phytosociologiques dans l'Ile de Minorque , 1971 .

[2]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[4]  P. Ferrar A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha (Part 1: text; Part 2: figures). , 2015 .

[5]  Ross S. Lunetta,et al.  Whitetail deer food availability maps from Thematic Mapper data , 1987 .

[6]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[7]  R. Itami,et al.  GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression : a study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel , 1991 .

[8]  J. Lawton,et al.  Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities : a theoretical perspective , 1992 .

[9]  J. Wiens Ecological Flows Across Landscape Boundaries: A Conceptual Overview , 1992 .

[10]  J. Rusek Distribution and Dynamics of Soil Organisms Across Ecotones , 1992 .

[11]  John E. Estes,et al.  A remote sensing research agenda for mapping and monitoring biodiversity , 1993 .

[12]  A. F. Jørgensen,et al.  The use of satellite images for mapping of landscape and biological diversity in the Sahel , 1996 .

[13]  R. Didham,et al.  Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Frédéric Médail,et al.  Hot-Spots Analysis for Conservation of Plant Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin , 1997 .

[15]  J. Roland,et al.  Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Giuliana Profeti,et al.  Use of remote sensing in ecological research: preliminary results , 1998, Remote Sensing.

[17]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[18]  G. Cumming Using habitat models to map diversity: pan‐African species richness of ticks (Acari: Ixodida) , 2000 .

[19]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Landscape research, landscape policy and Earth observation , 2000 .

[21]  H. Rusterholz,et al.  Short-term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation , 2000, Oecologia.

[22]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  EFFECTS OF WITHIN- AND BETWEEN-PATCH PROCESSES ON COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN A FRAGMENTATION EXPERIMENT , 2001 .

[23]  Special Section: Contributions of Remote Sensing to Biodiversity Conservation: a NASA Approach , 2001 .

[24]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity , 2001 .

[25]  R. Didham,et al.  Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation , 2002 .

[26]  Narayani Barve,et al.  Assessing Biodiversity from Space: an Example from the Western Ghats, India , 2002 .

[27]  P. Pearman THE SCALE OF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE: HABITAT VARIATION AND AVIAN GUILDS IN TROPICAL FOREST UNDERSTORY , 2002 .

[28]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Insect communities and biotic interactions on fragmented calcareous grasslands - a mini review , 2002 .

[29]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[30]  D. Ducrot,et al.  Identification of landscape units from an insect perspective , 2003 .

[31]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Additive Partitioning of Species Diversity across Multiple Spatial Scales: Implications for Regional Conservation of Biodiversity , 2003 .

[32]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  A comparison of satellite data and landscape variables in predicting bird species occurrences in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  Michael D. Jennings,et al.  Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results* , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  Kathryn E. Freemark,et al.  Effects of landscape structure on nest predation in roadsides of a midwestern agroecosystem: a multiscale analysis , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  J. Joachim,et al.  Modelling the effects of forest fragmentation on certain species of forest-breeding birds , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  S. Collinge,et al.  The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grasslands , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  N. Elliott,et al.  Influence of within-field and landscape factors on aphid predator populations in wheat , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Predicting mammal species richness and distributions: testing the effectiveness of satellite-derived land cover data , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  Tuuli Toivonen,et al.  Prediction of total and rare plant species richness in agricultural landscapes from satellite images and topographic data , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  I. Jonsen,et al.  Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  David M. Stoms,et al.  GAP management status and regional indicators of threats to biodiversity , 2004, Landscape Ecology.