Professionals’ knowledge and use of environmental assessment in an architectural competition

ABSTRACT In early design phases, architects, landscape architects and urban planners are key actors whose decisions determine the environmental impact of planning and building projects. Environmental and sustainability assessment tools for buildings and neighbourhoods have been developed to promote sustainable building, but their usage has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigated self-reported knowledge and usage of such tools among competitors and jury group from 10 European countries involved in the international architectural competition ‘A New City Centre for Kiruna’ in Sweden. The questionnaire revealed that 13% used environmental assessment tools or management systems in the competition, although 47% had used them previously. Tool users reported greater knowledge of how to handle environmental impacts than non-users. However, the self-rated experience of handling various environmental impacts, in the competition and in general, was low for both groups. Nevertheless, the self-rated importance of environmental impacts was high among all participants. Based on this study, it is concluded that environmental assessment tools, issues and goals can be better integrated into the processes of early design in planning and building projects, and in architectural competitions. Furthermore, to limit environmental impacts in building and planning projects, professionals need to be educated about environmental strategies and solutions.

[1]  Arno Schlueter,et al.  Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages , 2009 .

[2]  Drury B. Crawley,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends , 1999 .

[3]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Decision support for facilities management of the future : sustainability acellerator , 2012 .

[4]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[5]  Julie Cidell,et al.  Building Green: The Emerging Geography of LEED-Certified Buildings and Professionals , 2009 .

[6]  Ismail Rahmat,et al.  An Investigation of Factors Influencing Design Team Attributes in Green Buildings , 2010 .

[7]  Magnus Rönn,et al.  Architectural Quality in Competitions : a dialog based assessment of design proposals , 2011 .

[8]  K. Gowri.  Sustainability Green Building Rating Systems: An Overview , 2004 .

[9]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED , 2013 .

[10]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Sustainable building assessment tool development approach , 2012 .

[11]  D. Crawley,et al.  Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the Green Building Challenge , 2001 .

[12]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Miljöklassning av byggnader : Inventering av metoder och intressenters behov , 2006 .

[13]  Raymond J. Cole.  Shared markets: coexisting building environmental assessment methods , 2006 .

[14]  Hasim Altan,et al.  Comparative Review of Five Sustainable Rating Systems , 2011 .

[15]  Ayşin Sev.  A comparative analysis of building environmental assessment tools and suggestions for regional adaptations , 2011 .

[16]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Analysis of building environment assessment frameworks and their implications for sustainability indicators , 2011 .

[17]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  Barriers and drivers for sustainable building , 2011 .

[18]  Libby Schweber,et al.  The effect of BREEAM on clients and construction professionals , 2013 .

[19]  Chris Pyke,et al.  Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation , 2013 .

[20]  Getachew Assefa,et al.  Analysis of the most widely used Building Environmental Assessment methods , 2006 .

[21]  Mohamed Osmani,et al.  Feasibility of zero carbon homes in England by 2016: a house builder's perspective , 2009 .

[22]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[23]  Weiming Shen,et al.  Collaborative conceptual design - state of the art and future trends , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[24]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  What tensions obstruct an alignment between project and environmental management practices , 2012 .

[25]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  Managing the Technological Transition to Sustainable Construction of Buildings: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[26]  Marita Wallhagen,et al.  Design consequences of differences in building assessment tools: a case study , 2011 .

[27]  Bill Bordass,et al.  Rapid assessment checklist for sustainable buildings , 2006 .

[28]  Ignacio Zabalza,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines , 2011 .

[29]  Paul. Olomolaiye,et al.  Insights of architects’ knowledge of the Code for Sustainable Homes (CSH) in relation to low carbon housing design and delivery in the UK , 2012 .

[30]  Libby Schweber,et al.  Comparing the fit between BREEAM assessment and design processes , 2014 .

[31]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[32]  Magnus Rönn.  Theory and practice on quality judgement in architecture , 2008 .

[33]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Assessment of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings , 2007 .

[34]  Vincent Onyango,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment-related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years , 2012 .

[35]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks , 2004 .

[36]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[37]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Making pro-environmental behaviour work: an ethnographic case study of practice, process and power in the workplace , 2008 .

[38]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  MANAGING THE PERFORMING PARADOX IN ARCHITECTURAL COMPETITIONS , 2012 .

[39]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[40]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Green Building Evaluation and Labelling System , 2007 .

[42]  Jessica Lagerstedt,et al.  EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development , 2006 .

[43]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification , 2009 .

[44]  Magnus Rönn,et al.  Finnish architectural competitions: structure, criteria and judgement process , 2009 .

[45]  Pernilla Gluch.  Building Green - Perspectives on Environmental Mangagement in Construction , 2005 .

[46]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Sustainable Building Development in China - A System Thinking Study , 2014 .

[47]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles , 2005 .

[48]  Krishnan Gowri.  Green Building Rating Systems: An Overview , 2004 .

[49]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Impact of progressive sustainable target value assessment on building design decisions , 2015 .

[50]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[51]  Anna Forsberg,et al.  Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment , 2004 .

[52]  Liane Thuvander,et al.  Charting corporate greening: environmental management trends in Sweden , 2014 .

[53]  Ismail Rahmat,et al.  The Influence of Design Team Attributes on Green Design Performance of Building Projects , 2012 .

[54]  Tove Malmqvist,et al.  Owner organizations’ value-creation strategies through environmental certification of buildings , 2016 .

[55]  Marita Wallhagen,et al.  Framework for Detailed Comparison of Building Environmental Assessment Tools , 2013 .