In order to elucidate the behavioral significance of the central complex (CC), we have examined walking in 15 Drosophila mutant strains belonging to eight independent X-linked genes that affect the structure of the CC. Compared to four different wild-type strains, all are impaired either in a general or in a paradigm-dependent manner. Behavioral deficits concern walking activity, walking speed, or “straightness of walking” as measured in an object fixation task, in fast phototaxis, and in negative geotaxis. Behavioral deficits of three strains with mutations in different genes were studied in detail using mosaic analysis and high-speed cinematography. In all cases the focus for declining walking activity is located in the brain and is fully correlated with the respective defect of the CC. A high correlation between the degree of the behavioral impairment and the severity of the structural defect in two strains further adds to the evidence. Declining walking activity is not an unspecific side effect of structural brain defects, as steady walking is observed in structural mutants of the visual system and mushroom bodies. In mutant flies no- bridgeKS49 (nob), step size as a function of the stepping period is reduced. The focus of the resulting reduced average and maximum walking speeds resides in the brain and, again, the behavioral impairment fully correlates with the structural defects of the CC. While no indication is found for a role of the CC in setting up the basic stepping rhythm in straight walking (a respective phenotype in mutant central- complexKS181 flies resides in the ventral ganglion), a role in turning and start/stop maneuvers is suggested by aberrations in the stepping pattern of nob flies during such episodes.
[1]
C. W. Hinton.
The Behavior of an Unstable Ring Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster.
,
1955,
Genetics.
[2]
J. C. Hall,et al.
Fate mapping of nervous system and other internal tissues in genetic mosaics of Drosophila melanogaster.
,
1976,
Developmental biology.
[3]
M. Heisenberg,et al.
Isolation of Anatomical Brain Mutants of Drosophila by Histological Means
,
1979
.
[4]
K. Götz.
Visual guidance in Drosophila.
,
1980,
Basic life sciences.
[5]
E. Savvateeva,et al.
Behavioral effects of temperature sensitive mutations affecting metabolism of cAMP in Drosophila melanogaster
,
1981,
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.
[6]
Professor Dr. Ulrich Bässler.
Neural Basis of Elementary Behavior in Stick Insects
,
1983,
Studies of Brain Function.
[7]
J. Kien.
The initiation and maintenance of walking in the locust: an alternative to the command concept
,
1983,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[8]
D. Graham.
Pattern and Control of Walking in Insects
,
1985
.
[9]
A Borst,et al.
Drosophila mushroom body mutants are deficient in olfactory learning.
,
1985,
Journal of neurogenetics.
[10]
M. Heisenberg,et al.
Mutations in the proximal region of the optomotor-blind locus of Drosophila melanogaster reveal a gradient of neuroanatomical and behavioral phenotypes.
,
1992,
Journal of neurogenetics.
[11]
M. Hammer,et al.
Learning and memory in the honeybee.
,
1995,
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.