Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation

[1]  F. Zenker,et al.  Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions , 2022, Argumentation.

[2]  M. Lewiński.  Challenging Authority with Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Arguments from and to Authority , 2022, Languages.

[3]  Jean H. M. Wagemans,et al.  Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach , 2021, Argumentation.

[4]  M. Morreau.  Democracy without Enlightenment: A Jury Theorem for Evaluative Voting* , 2020 .

[5]  Shiyang Yu,et al.  Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation , 2020, Argumentation.

[6]  B. Scott.  Argumentation and the Challenge of Time: Perelman, Temporality, and the Future of Argument , 2020, Argumentation.

[7]  Manuel Atienza.  What is the Theory Legal Argumentation For? , 2020, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique.

[8]  L. Villadsen.  Progress, but Slow Going: Public Argument in the Forging of Collective Norms , 2019, Argumentation.

[9]  Martin Hinton,et al.  Why the Fence Is the Seat of Reason When Experts Disagree , 2019, Social Epistemology.

[10]  J. Wagemans.  Four basic argument forms , 2019, Research in Language.

[11]  Z. Makuch,et al.  Courts and the Environment , 2018 .

[12]  S. Aikin,et al.  The Owl of Minerva Problem , 2018, Southwest Philosophy Review.

[13]  E. Krabbe,et al.  Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation , 2018 .

[14]  Markus Kneer.  The norm of assertion: Empirical data , 2018, Cognition.

[15]  E. Krabbe,et al.  The Role of Argument in Negotiation , 2018 .

[16]  D. Godden,et al.  A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency , 2018, Synthese.

[17]  M. Lewiński.  Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy , 2017 .

[18]  P. Smart.  Mandevillian intelligence , 2017, Synthese.

[19]  S. Chambers.  Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy , 2017 .

[20]  Hélène Landemore.  Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy , 2017 .

[21]  M. Witek.  Mechanisms of illocutionary games , 2015 .

[22]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice , 2015 .

[23]  John Turri.  Selfless assertions: some empirical evidence , 2014, Synthese.

[24]  R. Kukla.  Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice , 2014, Hypatia.

[25]  Christian Kock.  Defining Rhetorical Argumentation , 2013 .

[26]  E. Krabbe,et al.  The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance , 2013 .

[27]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Conflict and Commonality in Habermas’s Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere , 2012 .

[28]  C. Lafont.  AGREEMENT AND CONSENT IN KANT AND HABERMAS: CAN KANTIAN CONSTRUCTIVISM BE FRUITFUL FOR DEMOCRATIC THEORY? , 2012 .

[29]  Elizabeth Fricker.  I—Elizabeth Fricker: Stating and Insinuating , 2012 .

[30]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning , 2012 .

[31]  W. Overton,et al.  Dual systems Competence ←-→ Procedural processing: A relational developmental systems approach to reasoning , 2011 .

[32]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation , 2010 .

[33]  P. Westerman,et al.  Arguing About Goals: The Diminishing Scope of Legal Reasoning , 2010 .

[34]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[35]  M. Green.  Speech Acts, the Handicap Principle and the Expression of Psychological States , 2009 .

[36]  Christian Kock,et al.  Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation , 2009 .

[37]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Four Failures of Deliberating Groups , 2008 .

[38]  J. Goodwin.  Argument Has No Function , 2008 .

[39]  H. Siegel,et al.  In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation , 2008 .

[40]  Jennifer Lackey,et al.  Norms of assertion , 2007 .

[41]  S. Jacobs.  Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad , 2007 .

[42]  D. Zarefsky.  Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric , 2007 .

[43]  Stefano Bertea.  The Arguments from Coherence: Analysis and Evaluation , 2005 .

[44]  N. Maccormick.  Rhetoric and The Rule of Law , 2005 .

[45]  Matt Weiner.  Must We Know What We Say , 2005 .

[46]  R. Sugden.  The Logic of Team Reasoning , 2003 .

[47]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? , 2001 .

[48]  A. Goldman.  Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[49]  Douglas Walton,et al.  The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument , 1998 .

[50]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[51]  Maeve Cooke,et al.  Authenticity and Autonomy , 1997 .

[52]  Keith DeRose,et al.  Knowledge, Assertion, and Lotteries , 1996 .

[53]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  Knowing and Asserting , 1996 .

[54]  Seyla Benhabib,et al.  Deliberative Rationalality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy , 1994 .

[55]  David Miller,et al.  Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice , 1992 .

[56]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[57]  R. Carnap.  On the Application of Inductive Logic , 1947 .

[58]  M. Hinton.  Evaluating the Language of Argument , 2021 .

[59]  DOROTA SEPCZYŃSKA,et al.  POST-TRUTH FROM THE , 2019 .

[60]  M. Bencze,et al.  How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning , 2018 .

[61]  Eveline T. Feteris,et al.  Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation, A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions - Updated and Revised Edition , 2017, Argumentation Library.

[62]  E. Krabbe,et al.  Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation , 2012 .

[63]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Inquisitive Logic , 2011, J. Philos. Log..

[64]  Keith Stenning,et al.  Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science , 2008 .

[65]  Philippe De Brabanter,et al.  Commitment: The term and the notions , 2008 .

[66]  J.,et al.  The Logic of Deep Disagreements , 2007 .

[67]  C. Lumer.  The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why? , 2005 .

[68]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Why deliberative democracy , 2004 .

[69]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1999 .

[70]  L. Lawrence.  The race card. , 1996, Nursing times.

[71]  Andrzej Wiśniewski,et al.  The posing of questions , 1995 .

[72]  Frank I. Michelman,et al.  Between Facts and Norms , 1992 .

[73]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in argumentative discussions , 1984 .