Improved power of familywise error rate procedures for discrete data under dependency

In many applications where it is necessary to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously, the data encountered are discrete. In such cases, it is important for multiplicity adjustment to take into account the discreteness of the distributions of the p-values, to assure that the procedure is not overly conservative. In this paper, we review some known multiple testing procedures for discrete data that control the familywise error rate, the probability of making any false rejection. Taking advantage of the fact that the exact permutation or exact pairwise permutation distributions of the p-values can often be determined when the sample size is small, we investigate procedures that incorporate the dependence structure through the exact permutation distribution and propose two new procedures that incorporate the exact pairwise permutation distributions. A step-up procedure is also proposed that accounts for the discreteness of the data. The performance of the proposed procedures is investigated through simulation studies and two applications. The results show that by incorporating both discreteness and dependency of p-value distributions, gains in power can be achieved.

[1]  J. Troendle,et al.  A Stepwise Resampling Method of Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 1995 .

[2]  Gerhard Hommel,et al.  IMPROVEMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS OF TARONE'S MULTIPLE TEST PROCEDURE FOR DISCRETE DATA , 1998 .

[3]  Joseph F. Heyse,et al.  Adjusting for multiplicity of statistical tests in the analysis of carcinogenicity studies , 1988 .

[4]  P. Westfall,et al.  Multiple Tests with Discrete Distributions , 1997 .

[5]  J W Tukey,et al.  Testing the statistical certainty of a response to increasing doses of a drug. , 1985, Biometrics.

[6]  Tarone Re A modified Bonferroni method for discrete data. , 1990 .

[7]  James F Troendle,et al.  Multiple Testing with Minimal Assumptions , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[8]  Yan Li,et al.  Permutation Multiple Tests of Binary Features Do Not Uniformly Control Error Rates , 2011 .

[9]  E. Seneta,et al.  Simple Stepwise Tests of Hypotheses and Multiple Comparisons , 2005 .

[10]  Y. Hochberg,et al.  Improved multiple test procedures for discrete distributions: New ideas and analytical review , 2007 .

[11]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[12]  Violeta Calian,et al.  Partitioning to Uncover Conditions for Permutation Tests to Control Multiple Testing Error Rates , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[13]  Improving Holm's procedure using pairwise dependencies , 2016 .

[14]  Nicolai Meinshausen,et al.  Asymptotic optimality of the Westfall--Young permutation procedure for multiple testing under dependence , 2011, 1106.2068.

[15]  E. Kounias Bounds for the Probability of a Union, with Applications , 1968 .

[16]  Martin Posch,et al.  Optimal exact tests for multiple binary endpoints , 2016, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[17]  Joseph F. Heyse,et al.  An Empirical and Simulated Comparison of Some Tests for Detecting Progressiveness of Response with Increasing Doses of a Compound , 1992 .

[18]  Paul J Catalano,et al.  Exact Analysis of Dose Response for Multiple Correlated Binary Outcomes , 2004, Biometrics.

[19]  Arthur J Roth,et al.  Multiple comparison procedures for discrete test statistics , 1999 .

[20]  Ruth Heller,et al.  False discovery rate controlling procedures for discrete tests , 2011, 1112.4627.

[21]  Joseph P. Romano,et al.  Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate , 2006, math/0611266.

[22]  Sebastian Döhler A discrete modification of the Benjamini–Yekutieli procedure , 2016 .

[23]  J. Hsu,et al.  Applying the Generalized Partitioning Principle to Control the Generalized Familywise Error Rate , 2007, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.