Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems

Abstract. Despite the proliferation of information technology, the implementation of information systems remains problematic. Many systems fail to live up to expectations and some end up as disasters. Research on implementation has been conducted for the past two decades, but no theoretical framework for IS implementation has been widely accepted. This paper proposes dialectical hermeneutics as a theoretical framework for IS implementation research. Dialectical hermeneutics, as an integrative theoretical framework, combines both interpretive and critical elements, and addresses those social and organizational issues which are critical to the successful implementation of information systems. The case study research method was used to examine the implementation of systems in three organizations.

[1]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies , 1991 .

[2]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[3]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature and Suggestions for Researchers , 1992, MIS Q..

[4]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[5]  R. Boland.  Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[6]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[7]  R. Boland,et al.  The experience of system design: A hermeneutic of organizational action☆ , 1989 .

[8]  Roland Sauerbrey,et al.  Biography , 1992, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[10]  Gianni Vattimo,et al.  Hermeneutics as Koine , 1988 .

[11]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: Thematic exposition , 1981 .

[12]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[13]  Mark Keil,et al.  Managing MIS implementation: identifying and removing barriers to use , 1992 .

[14]  Jr. R. J. Boland.  The in-formation of information systems , 1987 .

[15]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: Contents , 1981 .

[16]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[17]  Allen S. Lee.  Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[18]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process , 1981, MIS Q..

[19]  Terry Winograd,et al.  On "Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design". A Response to the Reviews , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[20]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Institutional Character of Computerized Information Systems , 1989 .

[21]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[23]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Evolution and Status , 1981, Adv. Comput..

[25]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..