Evaluating the Quality of Web Based Sustainability Reports: A Multi-method Framework

Sustainability reports bear the potential to improve a company's image and to create competitive advantages, for they influence consumers' buying decisions and the investment decisions of potential shareholders. There are multiple standards and guidelines on sustainability reporting, which, however, mainly relate to the contents of the reports. We argue that due to the stakeholder-focused nature of sustainability reports, additional quality criteria exceeding the mere content need to be considered to improve the stakeholders' acceptance. Since these criteria are stakeholder-specific, they need to be defined and evaluated with direct involvement of the stakeholders. Thus, we propose a multi-method framework for the quality evaluation of web based sustainability reports. In order to evaluate our framework and to gain first insights into stakeholder-focused quality and acceptance criteria, we applied our framework within a preliminary study. First experiences and results are presented and implications for theory and practice are derived.

[1]  Kelly Freeman,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Sustainability Reporting : An Alternative Methodological Approach , 2004 .

[2]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[3]  Richard Hall,et al.  A Multi-Method Evaluation of the Implementation of a Student Response System , 2006, AMCIS.

[4]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[5]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Interaction of Research Methods for System Evaluation and Theory Testing: A New Vision of the Benefits of Multi-Methodological Information Systems Research , 2004, ICIS.

[6]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[7]  Boris Otto,et al.  Consortium Research , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[8]  Jorge Marx Gómez,et al.  Making Stakeholder Dialogue for Sustainability Issues Happen - Benefits, Reference Architecture and Pilot Implementation for Automated Sustainability Reporting a La Carte , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability , 2010, MIS Q..

[10]  Ralf Isenmann,et al.  Online reporting for sustainability issues , 2007 .

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[13]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[15]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach , 2009 .

[17]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community , 2010, MIS Q..

[18]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[19]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  The Shoemaker's Children: Using Wikis for Information Systems Teaching, Research, and Publication , 2009, MIS Q..

[21]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[22]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Omar F. El-Gayar,et al.  Environmental Management Information Systems (EMIS) for Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Overview , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..