Autoclave performance and operator knowledge of autoclave use in primary care: a survey of UK practices.

Changes in the delivery of health care have increased the demand for minor surgical and screening procedures in general practice. This has increased the risk of cross-infection with blood-borne viruses and the demand for sterile instruments. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and training of medical personnel in England and Wales on aspects of autoclave use, and to test the effectiveness of their practice autoclaves. An anonymous postal questionnaire and autoclave performance survey using biological indicators was made of 700 general medical practitioners selected at random from FHSA lists from 12 Health Authorities in England and Wales. The overall response rate was 53.1% (N= 372) comprising 10% general practitioners and 90% practice nurses. Eighty-two percent of respondents used autoclaves with a mean age of 2.5 years, of which 91% had been serviced in the past year. While 35% of respondents made daily observation of gauges, 19% did not routinely monitor autoclave effectiveness. Six autoclaves failed to sterilize the spore test ampoules. Fourteen percent of respondents did not autoclave instruments after every patient. Only 33.1% reported wearing gloves during minor operations. Fifty five percent had training in cross-infection prevention. It was concluded that although there has been improvement in instrument decontamination procedures in general practice compared with previous surveys, further education of medical practitioners and practice nurses in the use of autoclaves and infection prevention and control is indicated. The failure of 2% of the autoclaves to kill spores suggests the need for increased monitoring of autoclave performance. Two-thirds of practitioners exposed themselves to increased risk of infection by carrying out minor surgery without the protection of gloves.

[1]  D MacAuley,et al.  Sterilization and disinfection in general practice in Northern Ireland. , 1999, The Journal of hospital infection.

[2]  W. Coulter,et al.  Autoclave performance and practitioner knowledge of autoclave use: a survey of selected UK practices. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[3]  J. Jones,et al.  Dental surgery assistants' roles in cross-infection control in general dental practice: their knowledge and use of autoclaves , 1994, British Dental Journal.

[4]  J. Nicosia,et al.  Five states move quickly on handpiece sterilization. , 1992, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  B. McErlane,et al.  Assessment of the effectiveness of dental sterilizers using biological monitors. , 1992, Journal.

[6]  J. Bader,et al.  Office personnel differ in assessing management strategies. , 1992, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  J. Dawson,et al.  Decontamination of instruments and control of cross infection in general practice. , 1990, BMJ.

[8]  J. Chetwynd Infection control procedures among New Zealand general practitioners: changes since the emergence of HIV infection. , 1990, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  Palenik Cj,et al.  Improving the performance of the office sterilizer. , 1992 .

[10]  S. Farrow,et al.  Disinfection methods in general practice and health authority clinics: a telephone survey. , 1988, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  P. Hoffman,et al.  Control of infection in general practice: a survey and recommendations. , 1988, BMJ.

[12]  C. Palenik,et al.  A survey of sterilization practices in selected endodontic offices. , 1986, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  N. Skaug,et al.  Proper monitoring of sterilization procedures used in oral surgery. , 1983, International journal of oral surgery.