OBJECTIVE
Public Health Announcements (PHAs) on television are a means of raising awareness about risk behaviors and chronic conditions. PHAs' scarce airtime puts stress on their target audience reach. We seek to help health campaigns select television shows for their PHAs about smoking, binge drinking, drug overdose, obesity, diabetes, STDs, and other conditions using available statistics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Using Nielsen's TV viewership database for the entire US panel, we presented a novel show discovery methodology for PHAs that combined (i) pattern discovery from high-dimensional data (ii) nonparametric tests for validation, and (iii) online experiments on Facebook.
RESULTS
The nonparametric tests verified the robustness of the discovered associations between the popularity of certain shows and health conditions. Findings from fifty (independent) online experiments (where our awareness messages were seen by nearly 1.5 million American adults) empirically demonstrated the value of the methodology.
DISCUSSION
For 2016, the methodology identified several shows whose popularities were genuinely associated with certain health conditions, opening up the possibility of health agencies embracing both big data and large-scale experimentation to address an old problem in a new way.
CONCLUSION
Policy makers can repeatedly apply the methodology as new data streams in, with perhaps different feature sets, pattern discovery techniques, and online experiments running over longer periods. The comparatively lower initial investment in the methodology can pay off by identifying several shows for a potentially national television campaign. As simply a by-product, the initial investment also results in awareness messages that might reach millions of individuals.
[1]
James D Sargent,et al.
Early Exposure to Movie Smoking Predicts Established Smoking by Older Teens and Young Adults
,
2009,
Pediatrics.
[2]
Jan Hauke,et al.
Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data
,
2011
.
[3]
H. Simon,et al.
Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation*
,
1954
.
[4]
D. Lakens,et al.
Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch's t-test Instead of Student's t-test with Unequal Group Sizes
,
2017
.
[5]
Simon J. Sheather.
Spurious Correlation
,
2011,
International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.
[6]
Leslie B. Snyder,et al.
Analysis of Public Service Announcements on National Television, 2001–2006
,
2009
.
[7]
K. Pearson.
Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs
,
1897,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
[8]
M. Stoolmiller,et al.
Exposure to smoking depictions in movies: its association with established adolescent smoking.
,
2007,
Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.
[9]
Catherine E. Tucker,et al.
Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads
,
2019,
Manag. Sci..
[10]
Jason C. Goldwater,et al.
Open source electronic health records and chronic disease management.
,
2014,
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.