Machine Learning-Based Pipeline for High Accuracy Bioparticle Sizing

High accuracy measurement of size is essential in physical and biomedical sciences. Various sizing techniques have been widely used in sorting colloidal materials, analyzing bioparticles and monitoring the qualities of food and atmosphere. Most imaging-free methods such as light scattering measure the averaged size of particles and have difficulties in determining non-spherical particles. Imaging acquisition using camera is capable of observing individual nanoparticles in real time, but the accuracy is compromised by the image defocusing and instrumental calibration. In this work, a machine learning-based pipeline is developed to facilitate a high accuracy imaging-based particle sizing. The pipeline consists of an image segmentation module for cell identification and a machine learning model for accurate pixel-to-size conversion. The results manifest a significantly improved accuracy, showing great potential for a wide range of applications in environmental sensing, biomedical diagnostical, and material characterization.

[1]  D. Tsai,et al.  Chirality-assisted lateral momentum transfer for bidirectional enantioselective separation , 2020, Light, science & applications.

[2]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Mask R-CNN , 2017, 1703.06870.

[4]  P. H. Yap,et al.  Nanophotonic Array-Induced Dynamic Behavior for Label-Free Shape-Selective Bacteria Sieving. , 2019, ACS nano.

[5]  William Graf,et al.  Deep learning for cellular image analysis , 2019, Nature Methods.

[6]  M. ScholarWorks Measurement Of Marine Picoplankton Cell-Size By Using A Cooled , Charge-Coupled Device Camera With Image-Analyzed Fluorescence Microscopy , 2019 .

[7]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry , 2018, Nature Methods.

[8]  M. Eisenstein,et al.  Shape-based separation of synthetic microparticles , 2018, Nature Materials.

[9]  Ai Qun Liu,et al.  Sculpting nanoparticle dynamics for single-bacteria-level screening and direct binding-efficiency measurement , 2018, Nature Communications.

[10]  Aysun Adan,et al.  Flow cytometry: basic principles and applications , 2017, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[11]  Y. Lo,et al.  Review: imaging technologies for flow cytometry. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[12]  Euan A. Ashley,et al.  Deep Learning Automates the Quantitative Analysis of Individual Cells in Live-Cell Imaging Experiments , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Joshua A. Jackman,et al.  Inflated Sporopollenin Exine Capsules Obtained from Thin-Walled Pollen , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Niklas Gloeckner,et al.  Dynamic Light Scattering The Method And Some Applications , 2016 .

[15]  David A Basiji,et al.  Principles of Amnis Imaging Flow Cytometry. , 2016, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Fast R-CNN , 2015, 1504.08083.

[17]  Erin A. Dreelin,et al.  Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Surface Water: A Case Study from Michigan, USA to Inform Management of Rural Water Systems , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[19]  Vasco Filipe,et al.  Critical Evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the Measurement of Nanoparticles and Protein Aggregates , 2010, Pharmaceutical Research.

[20]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  A review of modern particle sizing methods , 2009 .

[21]  Nicholas Hamilton,et al.  Quantification and its Applications in Fluorescent Microscopy Imaging , 2009, Traffic.

[22]  Gerald Entine,et al.  A comparison of avalanche photodiode and photomultiplier tube detectors for flow cytometry , 2008, SPIE BiOS.

[23]  Michele Scardi,et al.  Extracting fish size using dual underwater cameras , 2006 .

[24]  S. Almeida,et al.  Approaching PM2.5 and PM2.5 − 10 source apportionment by mass balance analysis, principal component analysis and particle size distribution , 2006 .

[25]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  In‐line Comparison of Particle Sizing by Static Light Scattering, Time‐of‐Transition, and Dynamic Image Analysis , 2006 .

[26]  Hoang Pham,et al.  Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics , 2023, Springer Handbooks.

[27]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Methodology for evaluating image-segmentation algorithms , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  Ron Kimmel,et al.  Efficient Dilation, Erosion, Opening and Closing Algorithms , 2000, ISMM.

[29]  P. Teunis,et al.  Sedimentation of Free and AttachedCryptosporidium Oocysts and Giardia Cysts in Water , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  Joanne M. R. Fernlund,et al.  The effect of particle form on sieve analysis: a test by image analysis , 1998 .

[31]  B. Weiner,et al.  Improvements in Accuracy and Speed Using the Time-of-Transition Method and Dynamic Image Analysis for Particle Sizing: Some Real-World Examples , 1998 .

[32]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Introduction to Light Microscopy , 1998 .

[33]  M. Sieracki,et al.  Measurement of marine picoplankton cell size by using a cooled, charge-coupled device camera with image-analyzed fluorescence microscopy , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[34]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  Keiichi Abe,et al.  Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[36]  A. Crewe,et al.  Scanning transmission electron microscopy * , 1974, Journal of microscopy.