Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

Natural populations of guppies were subjected to an episode of directional selection that mimicked natural processes. The resulting rate of evolution of age and size at maturity was similar to rates typically obtained for traits subjected to artificial selection in laboratory settings and up to seven orders of magnitude greater than rates inferred from the paleontological record. Male traits evolved more rapidly than female traits largely because males had more genetic variation upon which natural selection could act. These results are considered in light of the ongoing debate about the importance of natural selection versus other processes in the paleontological record of evolution.

[1]  Wim E Crusio.  AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS , 1998 .

[2]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  LIFE‐HISTORY EVOLUTION IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) 6. DIFFERENTIAL MORTALITY AS A MECHANISM FOR NATURAL SELECTION , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  F. Maytag.  Evolution , 1996, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[4]  R. Lenski,et al.  Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Hayden T. Mattingly,et al.  Laboratory predation on the Trinidadian guppy: implications for the size-selective predation hypothesis and guppy life history evolution , 1994 .

[6]  S. Stearns,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1992 .

[7]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[8]  John A. Endler,et al.  Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population , 1990, Nature.

[9]  Gary K. Meffe,et al.  Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). , 1989 .

[10]  D. Reznick,et al.  LIFE‐HISTORY EVOLUTION IN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA): 1. PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC CHANGES IN AN INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENT , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Derek A Roff,et al.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components , 1987, Heredity.

[12]  P. Grant,et al.  Oscillating selection on Darwin's finches , 1987, Nature.

[13]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  P. Gingerich.  Rates of Evolution: Effects of Time and Temporal Scaling , 1983, Science.

[15]  K. Meyer.  Maximum Likelihood Procedures for Estimating Genetic Parameters for Later Lactations of Dairy Cattle , 1983 .

[16]  D. Reznick.  THE IMPACT OF PREDATION ON LIFE HISTORY EVOLUTION IN TRINIDADIAN GUPPIES: GENETIC BASIS OF OBSERVED LIFE HISTORY PATTERNS , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution in Age-Structured Populations , 1984 .

[18]  R. Lande.  QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[20]  William H. Bossert,et al.  Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Cedric A. B. Smith,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics , 1960 .

[22]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .