A patient image-based technique to assess the image quality of clinical chest radiographs

Current clinical image quality assessment techniques mainly analyze image quality for the imaging system in terms of factors such as the capture system DQE and MTF, the exposure technique, and the particular image processing method and processing parameters. However, when assessing a clinical image, radiologists seldom refer to these factors, but rather examine several specific regions of the image to see whether the image is suitable for diagnosis. In this work, we developed a new strategy to learn and simulate radiologists' evaluation process on actual clinical chest images. Based on this strategy, a preliminary study was conducted on 254 digital chest radiographs (38 AP without grids, 35 AP with 6:1 ratio grids and 151 PA with 10:1 ratio grids). First, ten regional based perceptual qualities were summarized through an observer study. Each quality was characterized in terms of a physical quantity measured from the image, and as a first step, the three physical quantities in lung region were then implemented algorithmically. A pilot observer study was performed to verify the correlation between image perceptual qualities and physical quantitative qualities. The results demonstrated that our regional based metrics have promising performance for grading perceptual properties of chest radiographs.

[1]  C J Martin,et al.  Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[2]  C. Proukakis,et al.  Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography. , 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[3]  Bernhard Schmidt,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Ehsan Samei Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  David H. Foos,et al.  Enhancement method that provides direct and independent control of fundamental attributes of image quality for radiographic imagery , 2004, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[7]  M Sandborg,et al.  Evaluation of image quality in fluoroscopy by measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  L Costaridou,et al.  Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  P. J. Burt,et al.  Fast Filter Transforms for Image Processing , 1981 .

[10]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  D R Dance,et al.  A Monte Carlo program for the calculation of contrast, noise and absorbed dose in diagnostic radiology. , 1994, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[12]  E. Salli,et al.  Automatic image quality quantification and mapping with an edge-preserving mask-filtering algorithm , 2008, Acta radiologica.