The atomic intrinsic integration approach: A structured methodology for the design of games for the conceptual understanding of physics

Computer simulations combined with games have been successfully used to teach conceptual physics. However, there is no clear methodology for guiding the design of these types of games. To remedy this, we propose a structured methodology for the design of conceptual physics games that explicitly integrates the principles of the intrinsic integration approach for designing instructional games (Habgood & Ainsworth, 2011) with an atomic analysis of the structure of games (Cook, 2007; Cousins, 2005; Koster, 2005). To test this approach, we redesigned an existing game to teach electrostatics and compared the educational effectiveness of the original and redesigned versions. Our studies also compared an endogenous fantasy version of the game with a non-fantasy version. Our results showed that students who played the game which had been redesigned using the Atomic Intrinsic Integration Approach achieved a statistically significant improvement in results and showed fewer conceptual problems than the students who played the original version. The fantasy and non-fantasy versions, however, did not display any significant differences in outcomes. Based on the analysis and redesign of the game, we defined one possible methodology to assist in the design of games for the conceptual understanding of physics.

[1]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Discovery simulations and the assessment of intuitive knowledge , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  A framework for the design and integration of collaborative classroom games , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[3]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[4]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Electromagnetism Supercharged! Learning Physics with Digital Simulation Games , 2004, ICLS.

[5]  Michele D. Dickey Game Design Narrative for Learning: Appropriating Adventure Game Design Narrative Devices and Techniques for the Design of Interactive Learning Environments , 2006 .

[6]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games , 2015 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[8]  Kenneth D. Forbus Using Qualitative Physics to Create Articulate Educational Software , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[9]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Designing Computer Games to Help Physics Students Understand Newton's Laws of Motion , 1984 .

[10]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[11]  Margaret E. Gredler,et al.  Games and Simulations and Their Relationships to Learning , 2013 .

[12]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  A powerful tool for teaching science , 2006 .

[13]  Jim Bizzocchi,et al.  Game, Motivation, and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[14]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[15]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[16]  R. Bowen Loftin,et al.  VR's frames of reference: a visualization technique for mastering abstract multidimensional information , 1999, CHI '99.

[17]  M. P. Jacob Habgood,et al.  Motivating Children to Learn Effectively: Exploring the Value of Intrinsic Integration in Educational Games , 2011 .

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[19]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics , 2006 .