Systems Design, Process Performance and Economic Outcomes

IT value remains a serious concern of management today, especially how it should be measured and how it is created. Although we have made significant progress at the firm and aggregate levels of analysis, process level analysis is still in its infancy, and there is a need for a systematic basis for identifying IT impacts. We provide such an approach by developing two models: a process performance model of how system characteristics enhance process output and quality, and an economic performance model linking process performance to the economic performance of the firm. We apply these models to global trade services in international banking. We obtained estimates for key variables in both models and general support for the approach. We interpret our results and discuss the merits of the process-level approach for the assessment of IT-reliant work systems.

[1]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Valuing information technology infrastructures: a growth options approach , 2007, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[2]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Computers And Growth , 1995 .

[3]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Measuring and Modeling the Business Value of Information Technology, Chapter 4. , 1988 .

[4]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  F. Javier Lerch,et al.  Assessing the impact of information technology on labor productivity A field study , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  DOES IT OUTSOURCING PAY OFF? EVIDENCE FROM INDUSTRY-LEVEL DATA , 2005 .

[7]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  MIS and information economics: augmenting rich descriptions with analytical rigor in information systems design , 1989, ICIS '89.

[8]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  The Effects of Process Characteristics on the Value of B2B E-Procurement , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[10]  Steven L. Alter 18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  S. Roach Services under siege--the restructuring imperative. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[12]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Z. Griliches Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint , 1998 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[16]  Jacob Marschak,et al.  THE PAYOFF-RELEVANT DESCRIPTION OF STATES AND ACTS. , 1963 .

[17]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  The economics of mobile payments: Understanding stakeholder issues for an emerging financial technology application , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[18]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[19]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[20]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology in Global Wholesale Banking: The Case of Trade Services , 2002, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[21]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[23]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  Understanding the Business Value of Information Technology Investments: Theoretical Evidence from Alternative Market and Cost Structures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[25]  John Bound,et al.  Changes in the Structure of Wages During the 1980&Apos;S: an Evaluation of Alternative Explanations , 1989, The American economic review.

[26]  A. Buse,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1972 .

[27]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Measuring Gains in Operational Efficiency from Information Technology: A Study of the Positran Deployment at Hardee'S Inc. , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  James I. Cash,et al.  Global Electronic Wholesale Banking , 1990 .

[29]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Rational expectations, optimal control and information technology adoption , 2005, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[30]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[32]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[33]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Should we wait? Network externalities and electronic billing adoption , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Information Exploitation and Interorganizational Systems Ownership , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Electronic Integration and Strategic Advantage: A Quasi-Experimental Study in the Insurance Industry , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  An Economic Model of Product Quality and IT Value , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[38]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment , 1989, ICIS '89.

[39]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Understanding state and national growth co-movement: A study of shared ATM networks in the United States , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[41]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[42]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[43]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[44]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[45]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Structure and Process in Modern Societies , 1961 .

[46]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[47]  T. Bresnahan Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance: Mainframe Computers inFinancial Services , 1986 .

[48]  Shahida Wizarat,et al.  On profitability and industrial concentration in Pakistan , 1992 .

[49]  Roger D. Stover,et al.  Standby letters of credit and large bank capital: An empirical analysis , 1991 .

[50]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .