Visual evoked potentials in relation to visual acuity in macular disease.

PURPOSE To investigate how central retinal function contributes to pattern visual evoked cortical potentials (PVECPs), we recorded transient and steady-state PVECPs in patients with macular disease and compared the results with those of patients with optic neuritis. The results were also evaluated for correlation with visual acuity and kinetic perimetric measurements. METHODS PVECPs to 3 rev/s stimulation (transient) and 12 rev/s stimulation (steady-state) for check sizes 15' and 30' were obtained from all patients and age-matched healthy controls. The peak latency and amplitude of the P100 component of the transient VECP and the amplitudes of the steady-state VECP were measured and evaluated. RESULTS Patients with macular disease produced significant delay of P100 latency and amplitude attenuation of the steady-state VECP, as compared with healthy subjects. P100 latency delay was less in patients with macular disease than in those with optic neuritis, while the attenuation rate of the steady-state VECP amplitude was similar between groups. Visual acuity was correlated with P100 latency and steady-state VECP amplitude reduction. CONCLUSIONS Although the delay of latency was less in patients with macular disease than in those with optic neuritis, the electrophysiologic alterations that occur in macular disease demonstrate a potential for diagnostic value at the level of the retina.

[1]  K. Murayama,et al.  How are macular changes reflected in pattern visually evoked cortical potentials? , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[2]  A. Pinckers,et al.  Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with epiretinal membrane. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Sherwood,et al.  Lens-induced endophthalmitis after Nd:YAG laser iridotomy. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  T. Hirose,et al.  Pattern reversal visual-evoked response as a prognostic indicator in macular gliosis. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  S. Bass,et al.  Visual evoked potential (VEP) delays in central serous choroidopathy. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  I. Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in macular disease. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Pattern ERGs and visual evoked potentials in maculopathies and optic nerve diseases. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  H. S. Thompson,et al.  Differentiation between recently resolved optic neuritis and central serous retinopathy. Use of tests of visual function. , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  H S Thompson,et al.  Visual function abnormalities in central serous retinopathy. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  C. D. Hart,et al.  Combined electrophysiological assessment of the visual system in central serous retinopathy. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Lennerstrand DELAYED VISUAL EVOKED CORTICAL POTENTIALS IN RETINAL DISEASE , 1982, Acta ophthalmologica.

[12]  J. Besson,et al.  Depressive effects of morphine upon lamina V cells activities in the dorsal horn of the spinal cat , 1975, Brain Research.

[13]  C. Marsden,et al.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  W. Mcdonald,et al.  Visual Evoked Response in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis , 1973, British medical journal.

[15]  S. Sokol An electrodiagnostic index of macular degeneration. Use of a checkerboard pattern stimulus. , 1972, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  F. Kellermann,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the Visual Evoked Response in a Case of Optic Neuritis , 1972 .