Enhancing of chemical compound and drug name recognition using representative tag scheme and fine-grained tokenization

BackgroundThe functions of chemical compounds and drugs that affect biological processes and their particular effect on the onset and treatment of diseases have attracted increasing interest with the advancement of research in the life sciences. To extract knowledge from the extensive literatures on such compounds and drugs, the organizers of BioCreative IV administered the CHEMical Compound and Drug Named Entity Recognition (CHEMDNER) task to establish a standard dataset for evaluating state-of-the-art chemical entity recognition methods.MethodsThis study introduces the approach of our CHEMDNER system. Instead of emphasizing the development of novel feature sets for machine learning, this study investigates the effect of various tag schemes on the recognition of the names of chemicals and drugs by using conditional random fields. Experiments were conducted using combinations of different tokenization strategies and tag schemes to investigate the effects of tag set selection and tokenization method on the CHEMDNER task.ResultsThis study presents the performance of CHEMDNER of three more representative tag schemes-IOBE, IOBES, and IOB12E-when applied to a widely utilized IOB tag set and combined with the coarse-/fine-grained tokenization methods. The experimental results thus reveal that the fine-grained tokenization strategy performance best in terms of precision, recall and F-scores when the IOBES tag set was utilized. The IOBES model with fine-grained tokenization yielded the best-F-scores in the six chemical entity categories other than the "Multiple" entity category. Nonetheless, no significant improvement was observed when a more representative tag schemes was used with the coarse or fine-grained tokenization rules. The best F-scores that were achieved using the developed system on the test dataset of the CHEMDNER task were 0.833 and 0.815 for the chemical documents indexing and the chemical entity mention recognition tasks, respectively.ConclusionsThe results herein highlight the importance of tag set selection and the use of different tokenization strategies. Fine-grained tokenization combined with the tag set IOBES most effectively recognizes chemical and drug names. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this investigation is the first comprehensive investigation use of various tag set schemes combined with different tokenization strategies for the recognition of chemical entities.

[1]  K. Cohen,et al.  Overview of BioCreative II gene normalization , 2008, Genome Biology.

[2]  Richard Tzong-Han Tsai,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Overview of BioCreative II gene mention recognition , 2008 .

[3]  Chun-Nan Hsu,et al.  Integrating high dimensional bi-directional parsing models for gene mention tagging , 2008, ISMB.

[4]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data , 2001, ICML.

[5]  Graciela Gonzalez,et al.  BANNER: An Executable Survey of Advances in Biomedical Named Entity Recognition , 2007, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[6]  Donghong Ji,et al.  WHU-BioNLP CHEMDNER System with Mixed Conditional Random Fields and Word Clustering , 2013 .

[7]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Annotation of Chemical Named Entities , 2007, BioNLP@ACL.

[8]  Zhiyong Lu,et al.  Understanding PubMed® user search behavior through log analysis , 2009, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[9]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  High-Throughput Identification of Chemistry in Life Science Texts , 2006, CompLife.

[10]  Peter T. Corbett,et al.  Cascaded classifiers for confidence-based chemical named entity recognition , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Ulf Leser,et al.  ChemSpot: a hybrid system for chemical named entity recognition , 2012, Bioinform..

[12]  Wen-Lian Hsu,et al.  NERBio: using selected word conjunctions, term normalization, and global patterns to improve biomedical named entity recognition , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al.  Detection of IUPAC and IUPAC-like chemical names , 2008, ISMB.

[14]  Hai Zhao,et al.  A Unified Character-Based Tagging Framework for Chinese Word Segmentation , 2010, TALIP.

[15]  Zhiyong Lu,et al.  NCBI at the BioCreative IV CHEMDNER Task : Recognizing chemical names in PubMed articles with tmChem , 2013 .

[16]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Chemistry-specific Features and Heuristics for Developing a CRF-based Chemical Named Entity Recogniser , 2013 .

[17]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  CHEMDNER: The drugs and chemical names extraction challenge , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[18]  Nianwen Xu,et al.  Chinese Word Segmentation as Character Tagging , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process..

[19]  Naomie Salim,et al.  Chemical named entities recognition: a review on approaches and applications , 2014, Journal of Cheminformatics.