Factors affecting the hunting success of male and female lions in the Kruger National Park

Long-term continuous observations of hunting lions Panthera leo in the Kruger National Park were used to assess the variables affecting hunting success of male and female lions. Generalized linear models revealed that seven variables had significant independent influences on hunting success, with the most important being the prey species hunted. Three types of variables were recognized: (1) lion related, where type of hunt, wind orientation, and the number of adults hunting; (2) prey related, where prey species and herd size; (3) environment related, where moon brightness, and grass height were significant. The sex of the lions had no effect on the overall probability of hunting success. Five second-order interactions significantly influenced the probability of hunting success, with the most important being the interaction between sex and the type of prey. The only significant third-order interaction containing the variable sex, was the inter-relationship with prey species and shrub cover. After removing the over-riding bias of the prey species, greater resolution of the factors affecting success was revealed. The major difference was that group size influences hunting success and concomitantly prey selection, promoting selection for medium-sized ungulates like zebra Equus burchelli and wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus by females, and males mainly capturing buffalo Syncerus caffer. We conclude that in African ecosystems, the hunting success of male and female lions varies with a range of combinations of lion-, prey- and environment-related variables. We demonstrate the hunting ability of male lions, which has perhaps been understated in other studies.

[1]  M. Mills,et al.  Some population characteristics of the Lion Panthera Leo in the Kalahari Gemsbok National Park , 1978 .

[2]  J. Junker,et al.  The demography and home ranges of marked lions (Panthera leo) between 1981- 2001 in Etosha National Park, Namibia. Predator Research Programme, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia. , 2001 .

[3]  K. V. Orsdol Foraging behaviour and hunting success of lions in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda , 1984 .

[4]  M. Mills A Comparison of Methods Used to Study Food Habits of Large African Carnivores , 1992 .

[5]  P. Stander Foraging dynamics of lions in a semi-arid environment , 1992 .

[6]  E. Wilson Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1976 .

[7]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Prey capture by the African lion , 1977 .

[8]  B. Bertram,et al.  Pride of lions , 1978 .

[9]  M. Mills,et al.  Predator--Prey Relationships: The Impact of Lion Predation on Wildebeest and Zebra Populations , 1992 .

[10]  V. Gelder,et al.  The Serengeti Lion , 1973 .

[11]  C. Packer,et al.  Group hunting behaviour of lions: a search for cooperation , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  H. Prins,et al.  Dangerous Lions and Nonchalant Buffalo , 1989 .

[13]  D. Collett Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[14]  H. Biggs,et al.  Hunting by male lions: ecological influences and socioecological implications , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  W. Gertenbach,et al.  Landscapes of the Kruger National Park , 1983 .

[16]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[17]  T. Caraco,et al.  Ecological Determinants of Group Sizes of Foraging Lions , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[18]  C. Packer,et al.  Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[19]  P. Stander,et al.  Hunting success of lions in a semi-arid environment , 1993 .

[20]  D. Collett,et al.  Modelling Binary Data. , 1994 .