Stroke lesion location influences the decoding of movement intention from EEG

Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of brain-machine interfaces (BMI) for motor rehabilitation after stroke, especially for those patients with severe paralysis. However, a cerebro-vascular accident can affect the brain in many different manners, and lesions in diverse areas, even from significantly different volumes, can lead to similar or equal motor deficits. The location of the insult influences the way the brain activates when moving or attempting to move a paralyzed limb. Since the essence of a rehabilitative BMI is to precisely decode motor commands from the brain, it is crucial to characterize how lesion location affects the measured signals and if and how it influences BMI performance. This paper compares the performances of an electroencephalography (EEG)-based movement intention decoder in two groups of severely paralyzed chronic stroke patients: 14 with subcortical lesions and 14 with mixed (i.e., cortical and subcortical) lesions. We show that the lesion location influences the performance of the BMI when decoding the movement attempts of the paretic arm. The obtained results underline the need for further developments for a better individualization of BMI-based rehabilitative therapies for stroke patients.

[1]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Movement-related brain oscillations vary with lesion location in severely paralyzed chronic stroke patients , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[2]  Á. Gil-Agudo,et al.  Continuous decoding of movement intention of upper limb self-initiated analytic movements from pre-movement EEG correlates , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interface in paralysis , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[4]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Molinari,et al.  Emerging Perspectives in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2014 .

[6]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Better than random? A closer look on BCI results , 2008 .

[7]  Carlos Bibian,et al.  Influence of artifacts on movement intention decoding from EEG activity in severely paralyzed stroke patients , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[8]  A. Pavlovic,et al.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Andreas R. Luft,et al.  Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  A hybrid brain-machine interface based on EEG and EMG activity for the motor rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[11]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[13]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[14]  C. Neuper,et al.  Relationship Between Electrical Brain Responses to Motor Imagery and Motor Impairment in Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[15]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Jong-Hwan Lee,et al.  EEG response varies with lesion location in patients with chronic stroke , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Bernhard Graimann,et al.  Quantification and visualization of event-related changes in oscillatory brain activity in the time-frequency domain. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[18]  M. Levin,et al.  Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Neurophysiology of Robot-Mediated Training and Therapy: A Perspective for Future Use in Clinical Populations , 2013, Front. Neurol..