New dummy head prototype : development, validation and injury criteria

Abstract Head injuries cause a large proportion of fatalities to road users particularly motorcyclists. Currently, helmets are assessed using rigid headforms and criteria related to acceleration measured at the centre of the headform. This system is not representative of the human head, which comprises a brain that moves relative to the skull in an impact. Finite element techniques were used in the design, development and validation of a new dummy head prototype named Bi-mass 150. It has been constructed using a Hybrid III headform and comprises two masses: a skull and a mass to represent the brain attached to the skull with a damped spring system. The novel feature of this device is that it can simulate the brain - skull relative displacement at a frequency close to 150 Hz. This is the frequency recorded in tests in vivo. The prototype was made by removing mass from a Hybrid III dummy head and fixing to the centre a metallic mass, which simulates the brain. The two components were connected by means of a plastic element such that the natural frequency corresponded to the 150 Hz measured in-vivo. The outputs from thirteen accident reconstructions, using an instrumented helmeted headform, were used as inputs to the FE model. The results are the first part of the process to establish bi-mass related injury criteria, and, in turn, to provide a much more human-like headform for evaluating and optimising head protection systems.

[1]  A J McLean,et al.  Mechanisms of brain injury related to mathematical modelling and epidemiological data. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  W. Goldsmith,et al.  Impact on a simple physical model of the head. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  S. E. Staffeld,et al.  Evaluation of Impact Test Accelerations: A Damage Index for the Head and Torso , 1970 .

[4]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[5]  V. R. Hodgson,et al.  The Determination of Response Characteristics of the Head with Emphasis on Mechanical Impedance Techniques , 1967 .

[6]  S. Margulies,et al.  An analytical model of traumatic diffuse brain injury. , 1989, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  R. Willinger,et al.  Développement et validation d'un modèle mécanique de la tête humaine , 1999 .

[8]  M. Ramet,et al.  Proposition of a new dummy head: the bimass 150 principle , 1993 .

[9]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF MOTORCYCLE HELMETS: MODELLING AND COUPLING WITH THE HUMAN HEAD , 2000 .

[10]  R L Stalnaker,et al.  Driving point impedance characteristics of the head. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  Development of a F.E.M. of the human head according to a specific test protocol , 1992 .

[12]  L. Taleb,et al.  HEAD BIOMECHANICS: FROM THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL TO THE PHYSICAL MODEL , 1995 .

[13]  James A. Newman,et al.  A generalized acceleration model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT) , 1986 .

[14]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  3-D anatomic brain model for relating cortical strains to automobile crash loading , 1991 .

[15]  Albert I. King,et al.  Finite element modeling of direct head impact , 1993 .

[16]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  MOTORCYCLISTS HEAD INJURIES: MECHANISMS IDENTIFIED FROM ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION AND HELMET DAMAGE REPLICATION , 1999 .

[17]  Peter Löwenhielm On the mechanism of cortical bridging vein rupture , 1973 .

[18]  C. W. Gadd Use of a weighted-impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard , 1966 .

[19]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Shock and vibration handbook , 1976 .

[20]  D. Viano Biomechanics of Head Injury — Toward a Theory Linking Head Dynamic Motion, Brain Tissue Deformation and Neural Trauma , 1988 .