Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women

Ethologist Konrad Lorenz defined the baby schema (“Kindchenschema”) as a set of infantile physical features, such as round face and big eyes, that is perceived as cute and motivates caretaking behavior in the human, with the evolutionary function of enhancing offspring survival. The neural basis of this fundamental altruistic instinct is not well understood. Prior studies reported a pattern of brain response to pictures of children, but did not dissociate the brain response to baby schema from the response to children. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and controlled manipulation of the baby schema in infant faces, we found that baby schema activates the nucleus accumbens, a key structure of the mesocorticolimbic system mediating reward processing and appetitive motivation, in nulliparous women. Our findings suggest that engagement of the mesocorticolimbic system is the neurophysiologic mechanism by which baby schema promotes human caregiving, regardless of kinship.

[1]  K. Berridge,et al.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[2]  R. C. Fraley,et al.  Attachment and Loss , 2018 .

[3]  J. Grafman,et al.  Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Tobias Brosch,et al.  That baby caught my eye... attention capture by infant faces. , 2007, Emotion.

[5]  J. Panksepp.  Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions , 1998 .

[6]  J. Haxby,et al.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[7]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[8]  Sarah Hall Sternglanz,et al.  Adult preferences for infantile facial features: An ethological approach , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Biological and social determinants of responsiveness to infants in 10-to-15-year-old girls , 1984 .

[10]  I. Bretherton.  Attachment and Bonding , 1992 .

[11]  K. Lorenz.  Studies in animal and human behaviour , 1970 .

[12]  E. Leibenluft,et al.  Mothers' neural activation in response to pictures of their children and other children , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  Henning Scheich,et al.  FMRI activations of amygdala, cingulate cortex, and auditory cortex by infant laughing and crying , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Eric E. Nelson,et al.  Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  R. Hoskins,et al.  Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations , 2007 .

[16]  J. Panksepp,et al.  Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: An affective neuroethological perspective , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[17]  Hiram E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness , 1979 .

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Erich Seifritz,et al.  Differential sex-independent amygdala response to infant crying and laughing in parents versus nonparents , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  R. Hinde,et al.  The evolution of the teddy bear , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Predictability Modulates Human Brain Response to Reward , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Let’s face it: It’s a cortical network , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  A. Dale,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Mccall,et al.  Attention of 4-Month Infants to Discrepancy and Babyishness. , 1980 .

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Baby beautiful: adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness. , 1984, Child development.

[28]  N. Cozzarelli.  PNAS Early Edition. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Lovejoy,et al.  Maternal depression and parenting behavior: a meta-analytic review. , 2000, Clinical psychology review.

[31]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  D. Enlow.  Handbook of facial growth , 1975 .

[33]  J. Langlois,et al.  Infant Attractiveness Predicts Maternal Behaviors and Attitudes , 1995 .

[34]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  A Psychophysical Study of “Cuteness” , 1960 .

[35]  Thomas R. Alley,et al.  Head shape and the perception of cuteness. , 1981 .

[36]  G. W. Rever.  Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment , 1972 .

[37]  Peter Fonagy,et al.  What's in a Smile? Maternal Brain Responses to Infant Facial Cues , 2008, Pediatrics.

[38]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  N. Tinbergen,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[40]  J. Langlois,et al.  Adults' responses to infants varying in appearance of age and attractiveness. , 1991, Child development.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Craske,et al.  A Specific and Rapid Neural Signature for Parental Instinct , 2008, PloS one.

[43]  C. Cacou.  Anthropometry of the head and face , 1995 .

[44]  T. Alley.  Growth-produced Changes in Body Shape and Size As Determinants of Perceived Age and Adult Caregiving. , 1983 .

[45]  L. Leavitt.  Mothers' sensitivity to infant signals. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[46]  D. Barash.  Human Ethology , 1973 .

[47]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  J. Newman.  Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. , 2000 .

[49]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation , 2002, Neuron.

[51]  Wakako Sanefuji,et al.  Development of preference for baby faces across species in humans (Homo sapiens) , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[52]  William Fullard,et al.  An Investigation of Lorenz's "Babyness". , 1976 .

[53]  X. Hu,et al.  4 T-fMRI study of nonspatial shifting of selective attention: cerebellar and parietal contributions. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[55]  R. Gur,et al.  Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults. , 2009, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[56]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[58]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences , 2002, Human nature.

[59]  T. Alley.  Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection. , 1983 .