Evidence from Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve Does Not Exist

The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis - an inverted U-shape relation between various indicators of environmental degradation and income per capita - has become one of the 'stylised facts' of environmental and resource economics. This is despite considerable criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Cointegration analysis can be used to test the validity of such stylised facts when the data involved contain stochastic trends. In the present paper, we use cointegration analysis to test the EKC hypothesis using a panel dataset of sulfur emissions and GDP data for 74 countries over a span of 31 years. We find that the data is stochastically trending in the time-series dimension. Given this, and interpreting the EKC as a long run equilibrium relationship, support for the hypothesis requires that an appropriate model cointegrates and that sulfur emissions are a concave function of income. Individual and panel cointegration tests cast doubt on the general applicability of the hypothesised relationship. Even when we find cointegration, many of the relationships for individual countries are not concave. The results show that the EKC is a problematic concept, at least in the case of sulfur emissions. Copyright Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2003.

[1]  Olivier J. Blanchard,et al.  Comment on "Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know About Unit Roots" by John Y. Campbell and Pierre Perron , 1991 .

[2]  J. Dignon,et al.  GLOBAL EMISSIONS OF NITROGEN AND SULFUR OXIDES FROM 1860 TO 1980 , 1989 .

[3]  T. Panayotou,et al.  Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[4]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Estimating Long-Run Relationships From Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels , 1995 .

[5]  C. Granger,et al.  Some Generalizations on the Algebra of I(1) Processes , 1993 .

[6]  T. Selden,et al.  Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? , 1994 .

[7]  Roger Perman,et al.  Unit Roots and Cointegration for the Economist , 1994 .

[8]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels , 1999 .

[9]  John A. List,et al.  Have air pollutant emissions converged among U.S. regions? Evidence from unit root tests , 1999 .

[10]  C. Granger,et al.  Spurious regressions in econometrics , 1974 .

[11]  P. Pedroni.  PANEL COINTEGRATION: ASYMPTOTIC AND FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF POOLED TIME SERIES TESTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE PPP HYPOTHESIS , 2004, Econometric Theory.

[12]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Testing for the 'Existence of a Long-run Relationship' , 1996 .

[13]  Alastair R. Hall,et al.  Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series With Pretest Data-Based Model Selection , 1994 .

[14]  T. Vogelsang.  Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change , 2001 .

[15]  T. Panayotou.  Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development , 1993 .

[16]  N. Shafik.  Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis , 1994 .

[17]  David I. Stern,et al.  Applying Recent Developments in Time Series Econometrics to the Spatial Domain , 2000 .

[18]  Nancy L. Stokey.  Are There Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[19]  Wilfred Beckerman,et al.  Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment? , 1992 .

[20]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Panel data unit roots and cointegration: an overview Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 61 , 1999 .

[21]  Matthew A. Cole,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[22]  Richard J. Smith,et al.  Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships , 2001 .

[23]  G. Maddala,et al.  A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test , 1999 .

[24]  J. Boyce,et al.  Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve , 1998 .

[25]  Allen S. Lefohn,et al.  Estimating historical anthropogenic global sulfur emission patterns for the period 1850–1990☆ , 1999 .

[26]  D. Möller.  Estimation of the global man-made sulphur emission , 1984 .

[27]  P. Pedroni.  Current Version : July 25 , 1999 CRITICAL VALUES FOR COINTEGRATION TESTS IN HETEROGENEOUS PANELS WITH MULTIPLE REGRESSORS * , 1999 .

[28]  P Ekins,et al.  The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence , 1997 .

[29]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels , 2003 .

[30]  D. Quah.  Exploiting Cross Section Variation for Unit Root Inference in Dynamic Data , 1993 .

[31]  K. Parikh,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF URBAN GROWTH: CROSS-NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AIR POLLUTION, AND CITY SIZE , 1992 .

[32]  Peter Pauly,et al.  The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve , 1998 .

[33]  S. D. Bruyn,et al.  Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[34]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2002 .

[35]  E. Barbier,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve , 1998 .

[36]  J. Dignon,et al.  Global Emissions of Nitrogen and Sulfur Oxides in Fossil Fuel Combustion 1970–1986 , 1992 .

[37]  Pierre Perron,et al.  Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots , 1991, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[38]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[39]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development , 1996 .

[40]  David F. Hendry,et al.  Co-Integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data , 1993, Advanced texts in econometrics.

[41]  Chihwa Kao,et al.  Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data When the Cross-Section and Time-Series Dimensions are Comparable , 1996 .

[42]  D. Stern.  Explaining changes in global sulfur emissions: an econometric decomposition approach , 2002 .

[43]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[44]  J. C. van den Bergh,et al.  Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves , 1998 .

[45]  J. List,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve: does one size fit all? , 1999 .

[46]  J. Vincent,et al.  Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a developing country , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[47]  David I. Stern,et al.  Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur , 2001 .

[48]  D. Stern.  Progress on the environmental Kuznets curve? , 1998, Environment and Development Economics.