Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents

Animations and videos are often designed to present information that involves change over time, in such a way as to aid understanding and facilitate learning. However, in many studies, static displays have been found to be just as beneficial and sometimes better. In this study, we investigated the impact of presenting together both a video recording and a series of static pictures. In experiment 1, we compared 3 conditions (1) video shown alone, (2) static pictures displayed alone, and (3) video plus static pictures. On average the best learning scores were found for the 3rd condition. In experiment 2 we investigated how best to present the static pictures, by examining the number of pictures required (low vs. high frequency) and their appearance type (static vs. dynamic). We found that the dynamic presentation of pictures was superior to the static pictures mode; and showing fewer pictures (low frequency) was more beneficial. Overall the findings support the effectiveness of a combination of instructional animation with static pictures. However, the number of static pictures, which are used, is an important moderating factor.

[1]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[3]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[4]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[5]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborer pour mieux apprendre d'une animation , 2005, IHM '05.

[6]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[7]  Fred Paas,et al.  Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach , 2007 .

[8]  Eric Jamet,et al.  Attention guiding in multimedia learning , 2008 .

[9]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  S. Ainsworth,et al.  Multiple Forms of Dynamic Representation. , 2004 .

[11]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[12]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[13]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[14]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[15]  M. Malbrán.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , 2007 .

[16]  W Hirst,et al.  On the representation of events: a study of orientation, recall, and recognition. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[18]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[19]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[20]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[21]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[22]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Learning Procedures: The Role of Working Memory in Multimedia Learning Experiences , 2022 .

[23]  P. Tsang,et al.  Diagnosticity and multidimensional subjective workload ratings. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[24]  Gary L. Allen,et al.  Applied Spatial Cognition: From Research to Cognitive Technology , 2007 .

[25]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[26]  Mary Hegarty.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning About Physical Systems , 2005 .

[27]  E. Jamet,et al.  La compréhension d'un document technique multimédia peut-elle être améliorée par une présentation séquentielle de son contenu ? , 2008 .

[28]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[29]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[30]  J. Sweller.  Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[31]  Paul Ayres,et al.  Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  15. Understanding machines from multimedia and hypermedia presentations , 2002 .

[33]  Mireille Betrancourt,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Animation and Interactivity Principles in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[34]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Structuring information interfaces for procedural learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[35]  Darren Newtson.  Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. , 1973 .

[36]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[37]  B. Tversky,et al.  Effect of computer animation on users' performance : A review , 2000 .

[38]  F. Paas,et al.  Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[39]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram , 1993 .

[40]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[41]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[42]  E. Jamet,et al.  Peut-on concevoir des documents électroniques plus efficaces ? L’exemple des diaporamas , 2008 .

[43]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Paul Ginns.  Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects , 2006 .

[45]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[47]  John Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[48]  Ok-Choon Park,et al.  Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review , 1992 .

[49]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .