A study of shoulder motions as a control source for adolescents with C4 level SCI.

This study quantitatively examined and compared the shoulder motions of C4 level spinal cord injury (SCI), C5 level SCI, and able-bodied persons as a command source. The study was motivated by both the success of shoulder control in functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems designed for C5 level SCI people and the lack of quantitative information on the shoulder motion of persons with C4 level SCI. A dual-axis transducer was used to monitor the elevation/depression and protraction/retraction angles of each subject's shoulder while they performed three experimental sections which examined: the range of active shoulder motion; the ability to move incrementally to discrete positions with the aid of visual feedback; and the ability to hold discrete shoulder positions for an extended period without visual feedback. Results indicated that each group had the largest average shoulder displacements (abled = 23 degrees +/- 4 degrees, C5's = 14 degrees +/- 3 degrees, and C4's = 9 degrees +/- 3 degrees) while attempting to elevate and that on average the C4 group had the smallest range of active shoulder motion. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found in either the accuracy or stability of reaching discrete positions with the aid of visual feedback or in the accuracy of holding discrete shoulder positions for an extended period without visual feedback. The results suggest that within their limited range of motion the individuals with C4 level SCI retained shoulder control sufficient for use as an neuroprosthetic command interface.

[1]  Doubler Ja,et al.  An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. , 1984 .

[2]  B. Craske,et al.  Contribution of joint and muscle afferents to position sense at the human proximal interphalangeal joint , 1992, Experimental physiology.

[3]  H. Skinner,et al.  Effect of fatigue on joint position sense of the knee , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  M J Mulcahey,et al.  Development of an upper extremity FES system for individuals with C4 tetraplegia. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  N. Hoshimiya,et al.  A multichannel FES system for the restoration of motor functions in high spinal cord injury patients: a respiration-controlled system for multijoint upper extremity , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Patrick E. Crago,et al.  TRACKING PERFORMANCE OF PATIENTS CONTROLLING FES HAND GRASP ORTHOSES. , 1986 .

[7]  R. Schmidt Fundamentals of Sensory Physiology , 1986, Springer Study Edition.

[8]  P H Peckham,et al.  Functional neuromuscular stimulation: outcomes in young people with tetraplegia. , 1994, The Journal of the American Paraplegia Society.

[9]  W K Durfee,et al.  Simulator for evaluating shoulder motion as a command source for FES grasp restoration systems. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  M J Mulcahey,et al.  Implanted functional electrical stimulation hand system in adolescents with spinal injuries: an evaluation. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  P. Peckham,et al.  Evaluation of shoulder movement as a command control source , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. Nathan,et al.  Upper limb functions regained in quadriplegia: a hybrid computerized neuromuscular stimulation system. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  P R Burgess,et al.  Signaling of ankle joint position by receptors in different muscles. , 1984, Somatosensory research.

[14]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  An Implantable Two-degree-of Freedom Joint Angle Transducer , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  C Ghez,et al.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[16]  H. Skinner,et al.  Functional performance of the knee after intraarticular anesthesia , 1983, The American journal of sports medicine.