A reference guide to microbial cell surface hydrophobicity based on contact angles

Acid–base interactions form the origin of the hydrophobicity of microbial cell-surfaces and can be quantitated from contact angle measurements on microbial lawns with water, formamide, methyleneiodide and/or α-bromonaphthalene. This review provides a reference guide to microbial cell surface hydrophobicity based on contact angles with the above four diagnostic liquids and involves Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, actinomyces, Brevibacterium linens, various Candida species, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Enterococci, Escherichia coli, lactobacilli, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, peptostreptococci, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, pseudomonads, Serratia marcescens, staphylococci, and streptococci, adding up to a total of 142 isolates among which many ATCC and NCTC strains and two standard strains in hydrophobicity research. Comparison of the results of an acid-base analysis of the microbial cell surfaces on the basis of contact angles for the latter two strains and the results of the so-called MATH (microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons) assay for cell surface hydrophobicity, demonstrates that only contact angles can provide a real estimate of cell surface hydrophobicity. Furthermore, the compilation of contact angle data presented, makes clear that no generalizations concerning the physico-chemical surface properties of microorganisms may be made.

[1]  S. Borriello,et al.  Cell surface properties of Clostridium difficile: haemagglutination, relative hydrophobicity and charge. , 1996, Journal of medical microbiology.

[2]  C. J. Oss,et al.  On the Predominant Electron- Donicity of Polar Solid Surfaces* , 1997 .

[3]  C. Pin,et al.  Lactic acid bacteria: hydrophobicity and strength of attachment to meat surfaces , 1997, Letters in applied microbiology.

[4]  K.‐K. Lee,et al.  A comparison of three methods for assaying hydrophobicity of pathogenic vibrios , 1996 .

[5]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Comparison of the physicochemical surface properties of Streptococcus rattus with those of other mutans streptococcal species. , 1991, Caries research.

[6]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Physicochemical and structural investigation of the surfaces of some anaerobic subgingival bacteria , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE POLAR SURFACE-TENSION PARAMETERS OF GLYCEROL AND FORMAMIDE, FOR USE IN CONTACT-ANGLE MEASUREMENTS ON POLAR SOLIDS , 1990 .

[8]  C. Volpe,et al.  Some Reflections on Acid-Base Solid Surface Free Energy Theories , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[9]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to silicone rubber in a parallel plate flow chamber in the absence and presence of nutrient broth. , 1997, Microbiology.

[11]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Uropathogenic Escherichia coli adhere to urinary catheters without using fimbriae. , 1996, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[12]  P. Martinetto,et al.  The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of some antibiotics on the hydrophobicity of gram-negative bacteria. , 1990, Journal of chemotherapy.

[13]  H. Busscher,et al.  Deposition efficiency and reversibility of bacterial adhesion under flow , 1995 .

[14]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems , 1988 .

[15]  J. Flament,et al.  [In vivo and in vitro analysis of the ability of urinary catheter to microbial colonization]. , 1996, Pathologie-biologie.

[16]  H. Busscher,et al.  Implications of microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons for evaluating cell surface hydrophobicity 1. Zeta potentials of hydrocarbon droplets , 1995 .

[17]  Paul Rouxhet,et al.  STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL SURFACE-PROPERTIES OF SERRATIA-MARCESCENS STRAINS , 1992 .

[18]  L. Melo,et al.  ADHESION OF PSEUDOMONAS-FLUORESCENS TO METALLIC SURFACES , 1992 .

[19]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Physicochemical surface properties of nonencapsulated and encapsulated coagulase-negative staphylococci , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Comparison of contact angles and adhesion to hexadecane of urogenital, dairy, and poultry lactobacilli: effect of serial culture passages , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[21]  Eugene Rosenberg,et al.  Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell‐surface hydrophobicity , 1980 .

[22]  Paul Rouxhet,et al.  Methods for Measuring Hydrophobicity of Microorganisms , 1987 .

[23]  S. Gorman,et al.  Role of physiological conditions in the oropharynx on the adherence of respiratory bacterial isolates to endotracheal tube poly(vinyl chloride). , 1997, Biomaterials.

[24]  H. Busscher,et al.  Effect of spreading pressure on surface free energy determinations by means of contact angle measurements , 1983 .

[25]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Physico-chemical and structural properties of the surfaces of Peptostreptococcus micros and Streptococcus mitis as compared to those of mutans streptococci, Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus salivarius. , 1992, Journal of general microbiology.

[26]  C. Pin,et al.  Cell surface hydrophobicity and attachment of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria to meat surfaces. , 1997, Meat science.

[27]  D. K. Owens,et al.  Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers , 1969 .

[28]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Adhesion of coagulase-negative staphylococci grouped according to physico-chemical surface properties. , 1997, Microbiology.