Joint sparsity-driven non-iterative simultaneous reconstruction of absorption and scattering in diffuse optical tomography.

Some optical properties of a highly scattering medium, such as tissue, can be reconstructed non-invasively by diffuse optical tomography (DOT). Since the inverse problem of DOT is severely ill-posed and nonlinear, iterative methods that update Green's function have been widely used to recover accurate optical parameters. However, recent research has shown that the joint sparse recovery principle can provide an important clue in achieving reconstructions without an iterative update of Green's function. One of the main limitations of the previous work is that it can only be applied to absorption parameter reconstruction. In this paper, we extended this theory to estimate the absorption and scattering parameters simultaneously when the background optical properties are known. The main idea for such an extension is that a joint sparse recovery step gives us unknown fluence on the estimated support set, which eliminates the nonlinearity in an integral equation for the simultaneous estimation of the optical parameters. Our numerical results show that the proposed algorithm reduces the cross-talk artifacts between the parameters and provides improved reconstruction results compared to existing methods.

[1]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive MUSIC: Revisiting the Link Between Compressive Sensing and Array Signal Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Improving Noise Robustness in Subspace-Based Joint Sparse Recovery , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive Diffuse Optical Tomography: Noniterative Exact Reconstruction Using Joint Sparsity , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  B. Pogue,et al.  In vivo quantitative imaging of normal and cancerous breast tissue using broadband diffuse optical tomography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Rank Awareness in Joint Sparse Recovery , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  An Augmented Lagrangian Approach to the Constrained Optimization Formulation of Imaging Inverse Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  David A Boas,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units. , 2009, Optics express.

[8]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  An Empirical Bayesian Strategy for Solving the Simultaneous Sparse Approximation Problem , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  R. Leahy,et al.  Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Jie Chen,et al.  Theoretical Results on Sparse Representations of Multiple-Measurement Vectors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  A. Chatziioannou,et al.  Tomographic bioluminescence imaging by use of a combined optical-PET (OPET) system: a computer simulation feasibility study , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  S R Arridge,et al.  Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Sandra K. Soho,et al.  Characterization of hemoglobin, water, and NIR scattering in breast tissue: analysis of intersubject variability and menstrual cycle changes. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  T. Khan,et al.  Absorption and scattering images of heterogeneous scattering media can be simultaneously reconstructed by use of dc data. , 2002, Applied optics.

[17]  Vadim A. Markel,et al.  Inverse problem in optical diffusion tomography. II. Role of boundary conditions. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[19]  R. Barbour,et al.  Normalized-constraint algorithm for minimizing inter-parameter crosstalk in DC optical tomography. , 2001, Optics express.

[20]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Experimental three-dimensional fluorescence reconstruction of diffuse media by use of a normalized Born approximation. , 2001, Optics letters.

[21]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Initial studies of in vivo absorbing and scattering heterogeneity in near-infrared tomographic breast imaging. , 2001, Optics letters.

[22]  Vadim A. Markel,et al.  Inverse problem in optical diffusion tomography. I. Fourier-Laplace inversion formulas. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Britton Chance,et al.  Breast imaging technology: Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging - applications to breast cancer , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Noninvasive Functional Imaging of Human Brain Using Light , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Optical diffusion tomography by iterative- coordinate-descent optimization in a Bayesian framework , 1999 .

[26]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  Modified distorted Born iterative method with an approximate Fréchet derivative for optical diffusion tomography , 1999 .

[27]  M. Schweiger,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of absorption and scattering images by multichannel measurement of purely temporal data. , 1999, Optics letters.

[28]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[29]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[30]  S. Arridge,et al.  Nonuniqueness in diffusion-based optical tomography. , 1998, Optics letters.

[31]  P M Schlag,et al.  Assessment of the size, position, and optical properties of breast tumors in vivo by noninvasive optical methods. , 1998, Applied optics.

[32]  A. Villringer,et al.  Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  B. Pogue,et al.  Optical image reconstruction using frequency-domain data: simulations and experiments , 1996 .

[34]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  D. Boas,et al.  Experimental images of heterogeneous turbid media by frequency-domain diffusing-photon tomography. , 1995, Optics letters.

[36]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[37]  N. Sochen Affine Invariant Flows in the Beltrami Framework , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[38]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Shedding light onto live molecular targets , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[39]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Spectroscopy enhances the information content of optical mammography. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[40]  R. Barbour,et al.  Frequency-domain optical imaging of absorption and scattering distributions by a Born iterative method. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[41]  Bernhard J. Hoenders,et al.  Existence of invisible nonscattering objects and nonradiating sources , 1997 .

[42]  A E Profio,et al.  Scientific basis of breast diaphanography. , 1989, Medical physics.

[43]  A. Hero,et al.  A Fast Spectral Method for Active 3D Shape Reconstruction , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.