A Computational Assessment of Actinide Dioxide Cations AnO22+ for An = U to Lr: The Limited Stability Range of the Hexavalent Actinyl Moiety, [O═An═O]2.

The isolated gas-phase actinide dioxide dications, AnO22+, were evaluated by DFT and coupled cluster CCSD(T) calculations for 12 actinides, An = U-Lr. CASSCF calculations were used to define the orbitals for the CCSD(T) calculations. The characteristic linear [O═An═O]2+ hexavalent actinyl(VI) was found to be the lowest energy structure for An = U, Np, and Pu, which also form stable actinyl(VI) species in solution and possibly for Am when spin-orbit effects are included. For Am, there is a divalent [AnII(O2)]2+ structure where the dioxygen is an end-on physisorbed η1-3O2 2 kcal/mol above the actinyl when spin-orbit effects are included which lower the energy of the actinyl structure. For An = Cm, Bk, and Lr, the lowest energy structure is trivalent [AnIII(O2-)]2+ where the dioxygen is a side-on superoxide, η2-O2-. For Cm, the actinyl is close in energy to the ground state when spin-orbit effects are included. For An = Cf, Es, Fm, Md, and No, the lowest energy structure is divalent [AnII(O2)]2+ where the dioxygen is an end-on physisorbed η1-3O2. The relative energies suggest that curyl(VI) and berkelyl(VI), like well-known americyl(VI), might be stabilized by coordinating ligands in condensed phases. The results further indicate that for californyl and beyond, the actinyl(VI) moieties will probably be elusive even using strong donor ligands. The prevalence of low oxidation states (OSs) An(II) and An(III) for transplutonium actinides reflects stabilization of the 5f orbitals and validates established trends, including the remarkably high stability of divalent No. Bond distances and other parameters suggest maximum bond covalency around plutonyl(VI), with a particularly substantial decrease in bond strength between americyl(VI) and curyl(VI).

[1]  H. Métivier.  Plutonium , 2020 .

[2]  Margriet Plouvier Suijs.  Americium , 2012, Definitions.

[3]  D. Dixon,et al.  Activation of Water by Pentavalent Actinide Dioxide Cations: Characteristic Curium Revealed by a Reactivity Turn after Americium. , 2019, Inorganic chemistry.

[4]  E. Glendening,et al.  Actinyl cation-cation interactions in the gas phase: an accurate thermochemical study. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[5]  D. Dixon,et al.  Gas Phase Hydrolysis and Oxo-Exchange of Actinide Dioxide Cations: Elucidating Intrinsic Chemistry from Protactinium to Einsteinium. , 2019, Chemistry.

[6]  D. Dixon,et al.  Remarkably High Stability of Late Actinide Dioxide Cations: Extending Chemistry to Pentavalent Berkelium and Californium. , 2017, Chemistry.

[7]  Kirk A Peterson,et al.  Correlation consistent basis sets for actinides. II. The atoms Ac and Np-Lr. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  D. Dixon,et al.  Prediction of Bond Dissociation Energies/Heats of Formation for Diatomic Transition Metal Compounds: CCSD(T) Works. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  D. Dixon,et al.  Use of Improved Orbitals for CCSD(T) Calculations for Predicting Heats of Formation of Group IV and Group VI Metal Oxide Monomers and Dimers and UCl6. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  D. Dixon,et al.  Benchmark Calculations of Energetic Properties of Groups 4 and 6 Transition Metal Oxide Nanoclusters Including Comparison to Density Functional Theory. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  D. Dixon,et al.  Reliable Potential Energy Surfaces for the Reactions of H2O with ThO2, PaO2(+), UO2(2+), and UO2(.). , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[12]  K. Peterson.  Correlation consistent basis sets for actinides. I. The Th and U atoms. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  L. Gagliardi,et al.  Quantum chemical calculations and experimental investigations of molecular actinide oxides. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[14]  L. Visscher,et al.  Communication: Relativistic Fock-space coupled cluster study of small building blocks of larger uranium complexes. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  Clark R. Landis,et al.  NBO 6.0: Natural bond orbital analysis program , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Martin Schütz,et al.  Molpro: a general‐purpose quantum chemistry program package , 2012 .

[17]  R. Mohr,et al.  High-resolution photodetachment spectroscopy from the lowest threshold of O{sup -} , 2011 .

[18]  L. Visscher,et al.  Benchmarking electronic structure calculations on the bare UO2(2+) ion: how different are single and multireference electron correlation methods? , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[19]  J. Marçalo,et al.  Gas-phase energetics of actinide oxides: an assessment of neutral and cationic monoxides and dioxides from thorium to curium. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[20]  P. Taylor,et al.  A diagnostic for determining the quality of single‐reference electron correlation methods , 2009 .

[21]  David A Dixon,et al.  Bond dissociation energies in second-row compounds. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[22]  W. D. de Jong,et al.  Prediction of vibrational frequencies of UO2(2+) at the CCSD(T) level. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[23]  R. Denning.  Electronic structure and bonding in actinyl ions and their analogs. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[24]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , 2007 .

[25]  J. Gibson.  Role of Atomic Electronics in f-Element Bond Formation: Bond Energies of Lanthanide and Actinide Oxide Molecules , 2003 .

[26]  Markus Reiher,et al.  The generalized Douglas–Kroll transformation , 2002 .

[27]  M. Dolg,et al.  Segmented contraction scheme for small-core lanthanide pseudopotential basis sets , 2002 .

[28]  H. Stoll,et al.  Valence basis sets for relativistic energy-consistent small-core actinide pseudopotentials , 2001 .

[29]  尚弘 島影.  National Institute of Standards and Technologyにおける超伝導研究及び生活 , 2001 .

[30]  F. Matthias Bickelhaupt,et al.  Chemistry with ADF , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  David E. Bernholdt,et al.  High performance computational chemistry: An overview of NWChem a distributed parallel application , 2000 .

[32]  Wang,et al.  Generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[33]  Peter J. Knowles,et al.  Perturbative corrections to account for triple excitations in closed and open shell coupled cluster theories , 1994 .

[34]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Energy‐adjusted pseudopotentials for the actinides. Parameter sets and test calculations for thorium and thorium monoxide , 1994 .

[35]  K. Dyall.  An exact separation of the spin‐free and spin‐dependent terms of the Dirac–Coulomb–Breit Hamiltonian , 1994 .

[36]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  Coupled cluster theory for high spin, open shell reference wave functions , 1993 .

[37]  Jürgen Gauss,et al.  Coupled‐cluster methods with noniterative triple excitations for restricted open‐shell Hartree–Fock and other general single determinant reference functions. Energies and analytical gradients , 1993 .

[38]  A. Becke.  Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange , 1993 .

[39]  Wang,et al.  Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[40]  G. Herzberg,et al.  Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure , 1992 .

[41]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[42]  Bernd A. Hess,et al.  Revision of the Douglas-Kroll transformation. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[43]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[44]  T. H. Dunning.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[45]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint , 1988 .

[46]  Rodney J. Bartlett,et al.  An open-shell spin-restricted coupled cluster method: application to ionization potentials in nitrogen , 1988 .

[47]  Parr,et al.  Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[48]  R. Bartlett,et al.  A full coupled‐cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples , 1982 .

[49]  B. Roos,et al.  The complete active space SCF (CASSCF) method in a Newton–Raphson formulation with application to the HNO molecule , 1981 .

[50]  B. Roos,et al.  A complete active space SCF method (CASSCF) using a density matrix formulated super-CI approach , 1980 .

[51]  R. D. Shannon.  Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides , 1976 .

[52]  Clark R. Landis,et al.  Valency and Bonding: A Natural Bond Orbital Donor-Acceptor Perspective , 2005 .

[53]  Robert J. Harrison,et al.  Parallel Douglas-Kroll Energy and Gradients in NWChem. Estimating Scalar Relativistic Effects Using Douglas-Kroll Contracted Basis Sets. , 2001 .

[54]  I. Brevik,et al.  THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF THE , 1998 .

[55]  K. Burke,et al.  Derivation of a generalized gradient approximation: The PW91 density functional , 1998 .

[56]  R. Denning.  Electronic structure and bonding in actinyl ions , 1992 .

[57]  R. Bader.  Atoms in molecules : a quantum theory , 1990 .

[58]  R. Parr.  Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules , 1989 .

[59]  J. Katz,et al.  Summary and Comparative Aspects of the Actinide Elements , 1986 .

[60]  Marvin Douglas,et al.  Quantum electrodynamical corrections to the fine structure of helium , 1971 .

[61]  G. Herzberg.  Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules , 1939 .