A Floating Controlled-Release Drug Delivery System: In Vitro-in Vivo Evaluation

A novel floating controlled-release drug delivery system was formulated in an effort increase the gastric retention time of the dosage form and to control drug release. The buoyancy was attributed to air and oil entrapped in the agar gel network. A floating controlled-release 300-mg theophylline tablet having a density of 0.67 was prepared and compared in vitro and in vivo to Theo-dur. The in vitro release rate of the floating tablet was slower. In vivo scintigraphic studies for a floating and a heavy nonfloating tablet, under fasting and nonfasting conditions, showed that the presence of food significantly increased the gastric retention time for both tablets, and tablet density did not appear to make a difference in the gastric retention time. However, the positions of the floating and nonfloating tablets in the stomach were very different. Bioavailability studies in human volunteers under both fasting and nonfasting conditions showed results comparable to those with Theo-dur. The floating controlled-release theophylline tablet maintained constant theophylline levels of about 2 mg/mL for 24 hr, which may be attributable to the release from the agar gel matrix and the buoyancy of the tablet in the stomach.

[1]  R. Gröning,et al.  Oral Dosage Forms with Controlled Gastrointestinal Transit , 1984 .

[2]  J. Robinson,et al.  Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery III: oral delivery of chlorothiazide using a bioadhesive polymer. , 1985, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[3]  S. S. Davis The design and evaluation of controlled release systems for the gastrointestinal tract , 1985 .

[4]  Kinam Park,et al.  Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral-controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion , 1984 .

[5]  Clive G. Wilson,et al.  The influence of food on the gastric emptying of multiparticulate dosage forms , 1987 .

[6]  H. Merkle,et al.  Design of oral drug delivery systems – Past, present and future , 1983 .

[7]  Clive G. Wilson,et al.  The effect of food on the gastrointestinal transit of pellets and an osmotic device (Osmet) , 1984 .

[8]  J. Dijkman,et al.  Food does not effect in bioavailability of theophylline from Theolin Retard® , 1984, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[9]  C. Gardner,et al.  Controlled Gastric Emptying. 1. Effects of Physical Properties on Gastric Residence Times of Nondisintegrating Geometric Shapes in Beagle Dogs , 1988, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  J. Robinson,et al.  Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: synthesis and evaluation of some swelling, water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. , 1985, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[11]  K. Ladefoged,et al.  Distribution of pellets in the gastrointestinal tract. The influence on transit time exerted by the density or diameter of pellets , 1978, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[12]  A. Hofmann,et al.  Controlled entry of orally administereddrugs: physiological considerations , 1983 .