Teleautonomous systems: projecting and coordinating intelligent action at a distance

The authors have coined the term teleautonomous to describe methods for producing intelligent action at a distance. Teleautomation goes beyond autonomous control in that it blends in human intelligence and action as appropriate. It goes beyond teleoperation in that it incorporates as much autonomy as is possible or reasonable. A novel approach for solving one of the fundamental problems facing teleautonomous systems is discussed in detail: the need to overcome time delays due to telemetry and signal propagation. Concepts called time and position clutches are introduced; these allow the time and position frames, respectively, between the local user control and the remote device being controlled to be desynchronized. The design and implementation of these mechanisms lead to substantial telemanipulation performance improvements, including the novel result of improvements even in the absence of time delays. The controls also yield a simple protocol for handoffs of the control of manipulation tasks between local operators and remote systems. >

[1]  W K McCoy,et al.  Predictor display techniques for on-board trajectory optimization of rendezvous maneuvers. AMRL-TR-66-60. , 1966, AMRL-TR. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.

[2]  W. F. Zimmerman,et al.  The NASA/OAST telerobot testbed architecture , 1989 .

[3]  R. Goertz FUNDAMENTALS OF GENERAL-PURPOSE REMOTE MANIPULATORS , 1952 .

[4]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Supervisory control of remote manipulation , 1967, IEEE Spectrum.

[5]  D. A. Kugath Experiments evaluating compliance and force feedback effect on manipulator performance , 1972 .

[6]  S. K. Ride Leadership and America's future in space , 1987 .

[7]  George A. Bekey,et al.  Model of the Adaptive Behavior of the Human Operator in Response to a Sudden Change in the Control Situation , 1969 .

[8]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[9]  J Vertut,et al.  Teleoperation and robotics :: applications and technology , 1987 .

[10]  Bruno M. Jau The JAU-JPL anthropomorphic telerobot , 1989 .

[11]  Richard A. Volz,et al.  New concepts in tele-autonomous systems , 1987 .

[12]  R. Bernotat,et al.  Principles and Applications of Prediction Display , 1966 .

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human supervisory control of robot systems , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Sanford W. Hinkal,et al.  The flight telerobotic servicer Tinman concept: System design drivers and task analysis , 1989 .

[15]  Kam S. Tso,et al.  Autonomous sensor-based dual-arm satellite grappling , 1989 .

[16]  George A. Bekey,et al.  Decision Processes in the Adaptive Behavior of Human Controllers , 1969, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[17]  F. Wallace Harrison System architectures for telerobotic research , 1989 .

[18]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Model analysis of remotely controlled rendezvous and docking with display prediction , 1986 .

[19]  J. W. Hill Study of modeling and evaluation of remote manipulation tasks with force feedback , 1979 .

[20]  J. E. Webb The space frontier. , 1965 .

[21]  J. V. Draper,et al.  The implications of force reflection for teleoperation in space , 1987 .