Effect of spatial frequency on transient and steady-state VEPs: stimulation with checkerboard, square-wave grating and sinusoidal grating patterns

We recorded VEPs to the alteration of checkerboard, square-wave grating and sinusoidal grating patterns to evaluate the contribution of the fundamental spatial frequency and higher harmonic components in 12 normal subjects. Their fundamental spatial frequencies were equated and ranged from 0.5 to 8.0 c/deg. Both the transient VEP (T-VEP) and steady-state VEP (S-VEP) were obtained. The latency and amplitude of P100 of T-VEPs were measured. S-VEPs were Fourier analyzed, and phase and amplitude of the second harmonic response were measured. The mean P100 latency and the mean phase had a U-shaped function with a peak at a fundamental spatial frequency of 2.0 c/deg irrespective of the stimulus patterns, while the mean P100 amplitude and the mean amplitude of S-VEPs did not show such spatial selectivity. At low and medium spatial frequencies, differences in P100 latency, phase and amplitude between pattern types were more pronounced. However, this difference became insignificant at high spatial frequencies. These results indicate that VEP responses are predominantly determined by the fundamental spatial frequency, and that the contribution of higher harmonics to VEP responses is not negligible. Our results are consistent with the concept that the human visual system may use spatial frequency-domain information.

[1]  D. Regan,et al.  Nonlinearity in human visual responses to two-dimensional patterns, and a limitation of fourier methods , 1987, Vision Research.

[2]  Anne Moskowitz,et al.  Effect of retinal blur on the peak latency of the pattern evoked potential , 1981, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Regan.  Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  S Tobimatsu,et al.  Clinical relevance of phase of steady-state VEPs to P100 latency of transient VEPs. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Complex visual textures as a tool for studying the VEP , 1985, Vision Research.

[7]  F. Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  James G. May,et al.  Effects of meridional variation on steady-state visual evoked potentials , 1979, Vision Research.

[9]  J. May,et al.  The effects of grating complexity on transient evoked potentials. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Regan.  Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine , 1972 .

[11]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Visual cortical neurons: are bars or gratings the optimal stimuli? , 1980, Science.

[12]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[13]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Contrast evoked responses in man. , 1973, Vision research.

[14]  D. H. Kelly.  Pattern detection and the two-dimensional Fourier transform: Flickering checkerboards and chromatic mechanisms , 1976, Vision Research.

[15]  S Tobimatsu,et al.  Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  V. Iragui,et al.  Retinocortical time exhibits spatial selectivity. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  Spatial frequency evoked visuograms in multiple sclerosis , 1992, Neurology.

[18]  E. Favale,et al.  VEP changes in Parkinson's disease are stimulus dependent. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1988, Applied optics.

[20]  M. Onofrj,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in Parkinson's disease: spatial frequency, temporal rate, contrast, and the effect of dopaminergic drugs , 1986 .

[21]  G. Plant,et al.  Transient visually evoked potentials to the pattern reversal and onset of sinusoidal gratings. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  D Ristanović,et al.  Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  E. Batschelet.  Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[24]  I. Bodis-Wollner,et al.  The effect of blur and contrast on VEP latency: comparison between check and sinusoidal and grating patterns. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  R Jones,et al.  Visual evoked response as a function of grating spatial frequency. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  E. Yund,et al.  Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  M. Brigell,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to multiple temporal frequencies. Use in the differential diagnosis of optic neuropathy. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  J. Keltner.  Visual evoked response. , 1977, The Western journal of medicine.

[29]  G G Celesia,et al.  Effect of spatial frequency on simultaneous recorded steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.