Modelling the Central North Sea pressure history

High pore pressures in compartmentalized Mesozoic reservoirs in the Central North Sea are a challenge to predict using conventional porosity-based methods applied to shale mudrocks. Porosity and effective stress relationships, which work well in young and rapidly deposited basins such as Tertiary deltas, are not readily applicable to older, high-temperature sediments, and cannot be applied to non-reservoir chalk carbonates in which diagenesis is the principal control on porosity change. Basin modelling offers an alternative and complementary approach to conventional pressure prediction. New compaction and fluid flow relationships have been applied in commercial basin modelling software to model a 74 km 2D profile across the Central North Sea extending from the Fulmar Field in Block 30/16 across the Judy-Joanne High (Block 30/7) to the UK-Norwegian border in Block 30/8. The resulting models also tested chemical compaction simulation as a way to handle porosity change in non-reservoir chalks. The models were calibrated using porosity and permeability data collected as part of the study. When rock property data were satisfactorily matched, predicted pore pressures were compared with pore pressure measurements from multiple reservoirs in several boreholes. The model results closely match actual pressures from thin base-Tertiary reservoirs, which are likely to be close to their equilibrium with overlying shale mudrocks. The models underestimate the pore pressures in the deeply buried Mesozoic reservoirs. We interpret the deep pressures in relation to the contribution to overpressure from compaction disequilibrium (principally Tertiary sediment loading) relative to other, fluid inflation processes, such as gas generation. Future modelling, incorporating new data on fluid volume change when kerogen generates gas or oil cracks to gas, is now necessary to examine the magnitude of overpressure from these secondary sources.

[1]  S. Larter,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mudstone lithology using geophysical wireline logs and artificial neural networks , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[2]  Andrew C. Aplin,et al.  Definition and practical application of mudstone porosity–effective stress relationships , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[3]  R. Swarbrick,et al.  A compaction trend for non-reservoir North Sea Chalk , 2002 .

[4]  R. B. Daniel Pressure prediction for a Central Graben wildcat well, UK North Sea , 2001 .

[5]  H. Auld,et al.  Integrated study of the Judy Field (Block 30/7a) : an overpressured Central North Sea oil/gas field , 2000 .

[6]  R. Swarbrick,et al.  Lateral transfer: a source of additional overpressure? , 2000 .

[7]  Richard E. Swarbrick,et al.  Diagenesis in North Sea HPHT clastic reservoirs — consequences for porosity and overpressure prediction , 1999 .

[8]  Joel R. Alnes,et al.  Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins; a reevaluation; discussion and reply , 1998 .

[9]  P. Japsen Regional Velocity-Depth Anomalies, North Sea Chalk: A Record of Overpressure and Neogene Uplift and Erosion , 1998 .

[10]  M. Gordon Distribution and origin of overpressure in the Central Graben of the North Sea , 1998 .

[11]  A. Aplin,et al.  Influence of lithology and compaction on the pore size distribution and modelled permeability of some mudstones from the Norwegian margin , 1998 .

[12]  R. Haszeldine,et al.  Pressure cells and pressure seals in the UK Central Graben , 1996 .

[13]  F. Schneider,et al.  Mechanical and chemical compaction model for sedimentary basin simulators , 1996 .

[14]  J. E. Brasher,et al.  Influence of Lithofacies and Diagenesis on Norwegian North Sea Chalk Reservoirs , 1996 .

[15]  Glenn L. Bowers,et al.  Pore Pressure Estimation From Velocity Data: Accounting for Overpressure Mechanisms Besides Undercompaction , 1995 .

[16]  C. Neuzil How permeable are clays and shales , 1994 .

[17]  M. Best,et al.  Petrophysical characteristics of shales from the Scotian shelf , 1991 .

[18]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Abnormal Pressures While Drilling: Origins, Prediction, Detection, Evaluation , 1989 .

[19]  P. Scholle Chalk Diagenesis and Its Relation to Petroleum Exploration: Oil from Chalks, a Modern Miracle? , 1977 .

[20]  W. Brace,et al.  Further studies of the effects of pressure on electrical resistivity of rocks , 1968 .

[21]  R. Johnson,et al.  Estimation of Formation Pressures from Log-Derived Shale Properties(*) , 1965 .

[22]  Torleif Holt,et al.  Hydrodynamic activity and tilted oil-water contacts in the North Sea , 2000 .

[23]  J. Meijerink,et al.  Charge and overpressure modelling in the North Sea: multi-dimensional modelling and uncertainty analysis , 1999 .

[24]  R. Hillis Quantification of Tertiary Exhumation in the United Kingdom Southern North Sea Using Sonic Velocity Data , 1995 .

[25]  L. Gaarenstroom,et al.  Overpressures in the Central North Sea: implications for trap integrity and drilling safety , 1993 .

[26]  T. S. Olsen,et al.  Late Jurassic half-graben control on the siting and structure of hydrocarbon accumulations: UK/Norwegian Central Graben , 1990, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[27]  Ben A. Eaton,et al.  The Equation for Geopressure Prediction from Well Logs , 1975 .