Validating an Evaporative Calibrator for Gaseous Oxidized Mercury

Understanding atmospheric mercury chemistry is the key for explaining the biogeochemical cycle of mercury and for improving the predictive capability of computational models. Increased efforts are being made to ensure comparable Hg speciation measurements in the air through establishing metrological traceability. While traceability for elemental mercury has been recently set, this is by no means the case for gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM). Since a calibration unit suitable for traceable GOM calibrations based on evaporation of HgCl2 solution was recently developed, the purpose of our work was to extensively evaluate its performance. A highly specific and sensitive 197Hg radiotracer was used for validation over a wide range of concentrations. By comparing experimental and calculated values, we obtained recoveries for the calibration unit. The average recoveries ranged from 88.5% for 1178 ng m−3 HgCl2 gas concentration to 39.4% for 5.90 ng m−3 HgCl2 gas concentration. The losses were due to the adsorption of oxidized Hg on the inner walls of the calibrator and tubing. An adsorption isotherm was applied to estimate adsorption enthalpy (ΔHads); a ΔHads value of −12.33 kJ mol−1 was obtained, suggesting exothermal adsorption. The results of the calibrator performance evaluation suggest that a newly developed calibration unit is only suitable for concentrations of HgCl2 higher than 1 µg m−3. The concentration dependence of recoveries prevents the system from being used for calibration of instruments for ambient GOM measurements. Moreover, the previously assessed uncertainty of this unit at µg m−3 level (2.0%, k = 2) was re-evaluated by including uncertainty related to recovery and was found to be 4.1%, k = 2. Calibrator performance was also evaluated for HgBr2 gas calibration; the recoveries were much lower for HgBr2 gas than for HgCl2 gas even at a high HgBr2 gas concentration (>1 µg m−3). As HgBr2 is often used as a proxy for various atmospheric HgBr species, the suitability of the unit for such calibration must be further developed.

[1]  K. Shibata Evaluation of neutron nuclear data on mercury isotopes , 2016 .

[2]  S. Sari,et al.  Dynamic calibration method for reactive gases , 2019, Measurement Science and Technology.

[3]  A. Brown,et al.  Accurate calibration of mercury vapour measurements. , 2008, The Analyst.

[4]  Michael R. Mananghaya,et al.  Adsorption of Mercury(II) Chloride and Carbon Dioxide on Graphene/Calcium Oxide (0 0 1) , 2016 .

[5]  Jiaoyan Huang,et al.  Development of an Understanding of Reactive Mercury in Ambient Air: A Review , 2021 .

[6]  L. Hepler,et al.  Mercury. Thermodynamic properties, chemical equilibriums, and standard potentials , 1975 .

[7]  C. Yuan,et al.  Determination of the Adsorption Isotherm of Vapor-Phase Mercury Chloride on Powdered Activated Carbon Using Thermogravimetric Analysis , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  M. Diéguez,et al.  Methylmercury production in the water column of an ultraoligotrophic lake of Northern Patagonia, Argentina. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[9]  X. Ren,et al.  Airborne Vertical Profiling of Mercury Speciation near Tullahoma, TN, USA , 2014, ATMOS 2014.

[10]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  An updated review of atmospheric mercury. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Noelle E. Selin,et al.  Global Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury: A Review , 2009 .

[12]  M. Horvat,et al.  A gravimetric approach to providing SI traceability for concentration measurement results of mercury vapor at ambient air levels , 2014 .

[13]  Jiaoyan Huang,et al.  Comparison of gaseous oxidized Hg measured by KCl-coated denuders, and nylon and cation exchange membranes. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  H. Goenaga-Infante,et al.  Evaluating the performance of oxidized Hg reference gas generators in the range ng m−3 to μg m−3 by improved coupling with ICP-MS , 2020 .

[15]  Jiaoyan Huang,et al.  Uncertainties of Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Measurements Using KCl-Coated Denuders, Cation-Exchange Membranes, and Nylon Membranes: Humidity Influences. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  D. Friend,et al.  Correlation for the Vapor Pressure of Mercury , 2006 .

[17]  M. Horvat,et al.  Mercury methylation and reduction potentials in marine water: An improved methodology using 197Hg radiotracer. , 2012, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[18]  Richard J.C. Brown,et al.  Temperature dependence of Hg vapour mass concentration at saturation in air: New SI traceable results between 15 and 30°C , 2016 .

[19]  G. Keeler,et al.  Using thermal analysis coupled to isotope dilution cold vapor ICP-MS in the quantification of atmospheric particulate phase mercury , 2013 .

[20]  M. Horvat,et al.  International system of units traceable results of Hg mass concentration at saturation in air from a newly developed measurement procedure. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[22]  A. Gupta,et al.  Determination of thermodynamic parameters from Langmuir isotherm constant-revisited , 2017 .

[23]  C. Yuan,et al.  Enhancing the adsorption of vapor-phase mercury chloride with an innovative composite sulfur-impregnated activated carbon. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  L. Ciavatta,et al.  Equilibrium constants of mercury(II) chloride complexes , 1968 .

[25]  J. Hodges,et al.  Development of a High-Resolution Laser Absorption Spectroscopy Method with Application to the Determination of Absolute Concentration of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in Air. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  I. Fonseca,et al.  Comparison of the Thermodynamic Parameters Estimation for the Adsorption Process of the Metals from Liquid Phase on Activated Carbons , 2011 .

[27]  R. Stevens,et al.  Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Jiaoyan Huang,et al.  Fast time resolution oxidized mercury measurements during the Reno Atmospheric Mercury Intercomparison Experiment (RAMIX). , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  M. Horvat,et al.  Validation of methodology for determination of the mercury methylation potential in sediments using radiotracers , 2008, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[30]  F. Slemr,et al.  Atmospheric mercury measurements onboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft , 2016 .

[31]  J. E. Norris,et al.  Provision of primary NIST traceability to support vapor phase mercury emissions monitoring of combustion sources using isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , 2020 .

[32]  M. Gustin,et al.  Reducing the uncertainty in measurement and understanding of mercury in the atmosphere. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  J. Tratnik,et al.  Mercury species, mass flows and processes in a cement plant , 2010 .

[35]  X. Ren,et al.  Automated Calibration of Atmospheric Oxidized Mercury Measurements. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China , 2009 .

[37]  P. Hopke,et al.  Ambient mercury source identification at a New York State urban site: Rochester, NY. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  M. Horvat,et al.  Stability and behaviour of low level spiked inorganic mercury in natural water samples , 2013 .

[39]  Y. Sabri,et al.  Studying mercury partition in monoethylene glycol (MEG) used in gas facilities , 2015 .

[40]  Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham,et al.  Comparison of 4 methods for measurement of reactive, gaseous oxidized, and particulate bound mercury. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  G. Pham,et al.  Absorption kinetics of mercury (II) chloride into water and aqueous sodium chloride solution , 2018, Fuel Processing Technology.

[42]  D. Jacob,et al.  Sources and deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere , 2009 .

[43]  Marta Jagodic,et al.  Traceable Determination of Atmospheric Mercury Using Iodinated Activated Carbon Traps , 2020, Atmosphere.

[44]  J. Ambrose Improved methods for signal processing in measurements of mercury by Tekran ® 2537A and 2537B instruments , 2017 .

[45]  Y. Duan,et al.  Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury. , 2017, Environmental pollution.

[46]  J. Sherwell,et al.  Dry deposition of gaseous oxidized mercury in Western Maryland. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[47]  Lingling Xu,et al.  Characteristics and sources of atmospheric mercury speciation in a coastal city, Xiamen, China. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[48]  Alexandre Poulain,et al.  Mercury physicochemical and biogeochemical transformation in the atmosphere and at atmospheric interfaces: a review and future directions. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[49]  E. Edgerton,et al.  Evaluation of the KCl denuder method for gaseous oxidized mercury using HgBr2 at an in-service AMNet site. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  A. Harvey Estimation of the Enhancement Factor for Mercury in Air , 2010 .

[51]  D. Karatza,et al.  A Comparison Among Different Sorbents for Mercury Adsorption from Flue Gas , 2015 .

[52]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Susceptibility of Soil Bound Mercury to Gaseous Emission As a Function of Source Depth: An Enriched Isotope Tracer Investigation. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  S. Bernard,et al.  Boron nitride ceramics from molecular precursors: synthesis, properties and applications. , 2016, Dalton transactions.

[54]  M. Horvat,et al.  Novel methodology for the study of mercury methylation and reduction in sediments and water using 197Hg radiotracer , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[55]  Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham,et al.  Improvements to the Accuracy of Atmospheric Oxidized Mercury Measurements. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[56]  H. Mao,et al.  Do we understand what the mercury speciation instruments are actually measuring? Results of RAMIX. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[57]  H. Hintelmann,et al.  Hydrology, Environment (Surface Geochemistry) The mercury isotope composition of Arctic coastal seawater , 2015 .