CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

BackgroundThe recently developed model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) enables significant reduction of image noise and artifacts, compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and filtered back projection (FBP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion detectability of low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) with MBIR in comparison with ASIR and FBP.MethodsChest CT was acquired with 64-slice CT (Discovery CT750HD) with standard-dose (5.7 ± 2.3 mSv) and low-dose (1.6 ± 0.8 mSv) conditions in 55 patients (aged 72 ± 7 years) who were suspected of lung disease on chest radiograms. Low-dose CT images were reconstructed with MBIR, ASIR 50% and FBP, and standard-dose CT images were reconstructed with FBP, using a reconstructed slice thickness of 0.625 mm. Two observers evaluated the image quality of abnormal lung and mediastinal structures on a 5-point scale (Score 5 = excellent and score 1 = non-diagnostic). The objective image noise was also measured as the standard deviation of CT intensity in the descending aorta.ResultsThe image quality score of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on low-dose MBIR CT (4.7 ± 0.5) was significantly improved in comparison with low-dose FBP and ASIR CT (3.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.004; 4.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.02, respectively), and was nearly identical to the score of standard-dose FBP image (4.8 ± 0.4, p = 0.66). Concerning decreased lung attenuation (bulla, emphysema, or cyst), the image quality score on low-dose MBIR CT (4.9 ± 0.2) was slightly better compared to low-dose FBP and ASIR CT (4.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.01; 4.6 ± 0.5, p = 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences in image quality scores of visualization of consolidation or mass, ground-glass attenuation, or reticular opacity among low- and standard-dose CT series. Image noise with low-dose MBIR CT (11.6 ± 1.0 Hounsfield units (HU)) were significantly lower than with low-dose ASIR (21.1 ± 2.6 HU, p < 0.0005), low-dose FBP CT (30.9 ± 3.9 HU, p < 0.0005), and standard-dose FBP CT (16.6 ± 2.3 HU, p < 0.0005).ConclusionMBIR shows greater potential than ASIR for providing diagnostically acceptable low-dose CT without compromising image quality. With radiation dose reduction of >70%, MBIR can provide equivalent lesion detectability of standard-dose FBP CT.

[1]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Improvement of Low-Contrast Detectability in Low-Dose Hepatic Multidetector Computed Tomography Using a Novel Adaptive Filter: Evaluation With a Computer-Simulated Liver Including Tumors , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Hiroaki Sugiura,et al.  Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Ultralow-Dose Computed Tomography of the Lung: A Pilot Study , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  Thomson Wh,et al.  International Commission on Radiation Protection. , 1990 .

[5]  R Proksa,et al.  Noise and resolution in images reconstructed with FBP and OSC algorithms for CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[7]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study. , 2005, Radiology.

[10]  O. Linton,et al.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Giang Nguyen,et al.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[13]  N Shandala,et al.  Scope of radiological protection control measures. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[14]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique , 2012, European Radiology.

[16]  Sebastian Feuerlein,et al.  New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[17]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Jingyan Xu,et al.  Is iterative reconstruction ready for MDCT? , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[19]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. , 2005, Radiology.

[20]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[21]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[22]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Fast Model-Based X-Ray CT Reconstruction Using Spatially Nonhomogeneous ICD Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  Michael F. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Effect of Edge-Preserving Adaptive Image Filter on Low-Contrast Detectability in CT Systems: Application of ROC Analysis , 2008, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[25]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters. , 2004, Radiology.

[26]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[27]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.