Scaling behaviours in the growth of networked systems and their geometric origins

Two classes of scaling behaviours, namely the super-linear scaling of links or activities, and the sub-linear scaling of area, diversity, or time elapsed with respect to size have been found to prevail in the growth of complex networked systems. Despite some pioneering modelling approaches proposed for specific systems, whether there exists some general mechanisms that account for the origins of such scaling behaviours in different contexts, especially in socioeconomic systems, remains an open question. We address this problem by introducing a geometric network model without free parameter, finding that both super-linear and sub-linear scaling behaviours can be simultaneously reproduced and that the scaling exponents are exclusively determined by the dimension of the Euclidean space in which the network is embedded. We implement some realistic extensions to the basic model to offer more accurate predictions for cities of various scaling behaviours and the Zipf distribution reported in the literature and observed in our empirical studies. All of the empirical results can be precisely recovered by our model with analytical predictions of all major properties. By virtue of these general findings concerning scaling behaviour, our models with simple mechanisms gain new insights into the evolution and development of complex networked systems.

[1]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Kronecker Graphs: An Approach to Modeling Networks , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Mathew D. Penrose,et al.  Random Geometric Graphs , 2003 .

[3]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Supplementary Materials for The Origins of Scaling in Cities , 2013 .

[4]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[5]  Mikhail Zhizhin,et al.  A Fifteen Year Record of Global Natural Gas Flaring Derived from Satellite Data , 2009 .

[6]  Stig Nordbeck,et al.  URBAN ALLOMETRIC GROWTH , 1971 .

[7]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Urban Scaling and Its Deviations: Revealing the Structure of Wealth, Innovation and Crime across Cities , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  O Dreyer,et al.  Allometric scaling and central source systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[9]  Samuel Arbesman,et al.  Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  M. Changizi Universal scaling laws for hierarchical complexity in languages, organisms, behaviors and other combinatorial systems. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Dmitri V. Krioukov,et al.  Network Mapping by Replaying Hyperbolic Growth , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size , 2007 .

[13]  Michael J Gagen,et al.  Accelerating Networks , 2005, Science.

[14]  Jiang Zhang,et al.  Accelerating growth and size-dependent distribution of human online activities. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A universal scaling law between gray matter and white matter of cerebral cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Collective dynamics of social annotation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  The scaling of human interactions with city size , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Scaling in Biology , 2000 .

[19]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[20]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  A unified theory of urban living , 2010, Nature.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth: Frontmatter , 1995 .

[22]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[23]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[24]  Brian J. Enquist,et al.  General patterns of taxonomic and biomass partitioning in extant and fossil plant communities , 2002, Nature.

[25]  Neo D. Martinez Scale-Dependent Constraints on Food-Web Structure , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[26]  S. Redner,et al.  Connectivity of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[27]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Hidden Geometry of Complex, Network-Driven Contagion Phenomena , 2013, Science.

[29]  Peter Sheridan Dodds,et al.  Scaling, Universality, and Geomorphology , 2000 .

[30]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Popularity versus similarity in growing networks , 2011, Nature.

[32]  Penny J Johnes,et al.  AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , 2013 .

[33]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Collaborative Tagging and Semiotic Dynamics , 2006, ArXiv.

[34]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[35]  T. Vicsek Fractal Growth Phenomena , 1989 .

[36]  Peter Mörters,et al.  A Spatial Preferential Attachment Model with Local Clustering , 2013, WAW.

[37]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Accelerated growth of networks , 2002, ArXiv.

[38]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Invention in the City : Increasing Returns to Scale in Metropolitan Patenting , 2004 .

[39]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Fractal concepts in surface growth , 1995 .

[40]  Lingfei Wu The accelerating growth of online tagging systems , 2011 .

[41]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[42]  S. Havlin,et al.  Dimension of spatially embedded networks , 2011 .

[43]  H. S. Heaps,et al.  Information retrieval, computational and theoretical aspects , 1978 .

[44]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .