MLPAnalyzer: Data Analysis Tool for Reliable Automated Normalization of MLPA Fragment Data

Background: Multiplex Ligation dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) is a rapid, simple, reliable and customized method for detection of copy number changes of individual genes at a high resolution and allows for high throughput analysis. This technique is typically applied for studying specific genes in large sample series. The large amount of data, dissimilarities in PCR efficiency among the different probe amplification products, and sample-to-sample variation pose a challenge to data analysis and interpretation. We therefore set out to develop an MLPA data analysis strategy and tool that is simple to use, while still taking into account the above-mentioned sources of variation. Materials and Methods: MLPAnalyzer was developed in Visual Basic for Applications, and can accept a large number of file formats directly from capillary sequence systems. Sizes of all MLPA probe signals are determined and filtered, quality control steps are performed, and variation in peak intensity related to size is corrected for. DNA copy number ratios of test samples are computed, displayed in a table view and a set of comprehensive figures is generated. To validate this approach, MLPA reactions were performed using a dedicated MLPA mix on 6 different colorectal cancer cell lines. The generated data were normalized using our program and results were compared to previously performed array-CGH results using both statistical methods and visual examination. Results and Discussion: Visual examination of bar graphs and direct ratios for both techniques showed very similar results, while the average Pearson moment correlation over all MLPA probes was found to be 0.42. Our results thus show that automated MLPA data processing following our suggested strategy may be of significant use, especially when handling large MLPA data sets, when samples are of different quality, or interpretation of MLPA electropherograms is too complex. It remains, however, important to recognize that automated MLPA data processing may only be successful when a dedicated experimental setup is also considered.

[1]  J. Rey,et al.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) screening in meningioma. , 2007, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[2]  J. Schouten,et al.  DNA Copy Number Changes at 8q11–24 in Metastasized Colorectal Cancer , 2005, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[3]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[4]  David M. Mount,et al.  A practical approximation algorithm for the LMS line estimator , 1997, SODA '97.

[5]  D. Zwijnenburg,et al.  Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  J. Arends,et al.  Colorectal adenoma to carcinoma progression follows multiple pathways of chromosomal instability. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[7]  J. Schouten,et al.  Chromosomal instability in flat adenomas and carcinomas of the colon , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[8]  D. Jong,et al.  Genomic deletions of MSH2 and MLH1 in colorectal cancer families detected by a novel mutation detection approach , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  Amplification , 1994, Definitions.

[10]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Robust regression and outlier detection , 1987 .

[11]  H. Edelsbrunner,et al.  Computing Least Median of Squares Regression Lines and Guided Topological Sweep , 1990 .

[12]  E. Schröck,et al.  Multiple putative oncogenes at the chromosome 20q amplicon contribute to colorectal adenoma to carcinoma progression , 2008, Gut.

[13]  Jim Albert,et al.  Bayesian Computation with R , 2008 .

[14]  A. Hills,et al.  Detection of subtelomere imbalance using MLPA: validation, development of an analysis protocol, and application in a diagnostic centre , 2007, BMC Medical Genetics.

[15]  S. Lam,et al.  Detecting exon deletions and duplications of the DMD gene using Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). , 2006, Clinical biochemistry.

[16]  C J L M Meijer,et al.  Increased gene copy numbers at chromosome 20q are frequent in both squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the cervix , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[17]  E. Ma,et al.  Amplification, mutation and loss of heterozygosity of the EGFR gene in metastatic lung cancer , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[18]  S. Sen,et al.  Genomic and expression array profiling of chromosome 20q amplicon in human colon cancer cells , 2005 .

[19]  J. Huang,et al.  Associations between VHL genotype and clinical phenotype in familial von Hippel–Lindau disease , 2007, European journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  J. Schouten,et al.  Detection of cryptic subtelomeric chromosome abnormalities and identification of anonymous chromatin using a quantitative multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay , 2005, Human mutation.

[21]  V. Gatta,et al.  Identification and characterization of different SHOX gene deletions in patients with Leri–Weill dyschondrosteosys by MLPA assay , 2006, Journal of Human Genetics.

[22]  P. Pauwels,et al.  Molecular analysis of primary gastric cancer, corresponding xenografts, and 2 novel gastric carcinoma cell lines reveals novel alterations in gastric carcinogenesis. , 2007, Human pathology.

[23]  F. Galton.  Kinship and Correlation , 1989 .

[24]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[25]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  Large genomic deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene identified by a novel quantitative method. , 2003, Cancer research.

[26]  P. Rousseeuw.  Least Median of Squares Regression , 1984 .

[27]  R. Vossen,et al.  Deletion and duplication screening in the DMD gene using MLPA , 2005, European Journal of Human Genetics.