Robust vector sensor array processing and performance analysis

Acoustic vector sensors, which measure scalar pressure along with particle motion (a vector quantity), feature many advantages over omnidirectional hydrophone sensors. A sizable literature exists on the theory of processing signals for many vector sensor array applications. In practice, however, mismatch (the difference between the assumed and actual system configurations), several noise processes and low sample support can pose significant problems. Processing techniques should be robust to these system imperfections and practical complexities. This thesis presents analytical results which quantify the effect of system mismatch and low sample support on acoustic vector sensor array performance. All arrays are susceptible to perturbations in array element locations; vector sensor arrays, however, are also sensitive to changes in sensor orientation. This is due to the fact that the particle motion vector measurement must be placed in a global reference frame. Gilbert and Morgan (1955) developed a statistical analysis with system mismatch for an array of scalar, omnidirectional elements. This thesis includes a vector sensor extension to their analysis by including sensor orientation perturbations. Theoretical expressions for the mean and variance of the vector sensor array spatial response are derived using a Gaussian perturbation model, with excellent comparisons between theory and simulation. Such analysis leads to insight into theoretical limits of both conventional and adaptive processing in the presence of system imperfections. One noteworthy result is that the vector aspect of the array "dampens" the effect of array mismatch, enabling deeper true nulls. This is accomplished because the variance of the vector sensor array spatial response (due to rotational, positional and filter gain/phase perturbations) decreases in the sidelobes, unlike arrays of omnidirectional hydrophones. As long as sensor orientation is measured within a reasonable tolerance, the beampattern variance dominates the average sidelobe power response. Results from random matrix theory are used to characterize the effect of low sample support on signal detection using a vector sensor array. When using vector sensors, the effects of low sample support potentially increase by a factor of four since each element in a vector sensor array consists of a scalar hydrophone and up to three spatially orthogonal particle motion sensors. Also presented is an analysis of vector sensor array performance in ocean noise given an arbitrary spatial array configuration, sensor orientation and particle motion sensor type (velocity or acceleration). Several different ocean noise models exist, including isotropic noise, directional noise and realistic surface generated noise. Theoretical expressions are derived for array data covariance matrices in these different noise models for arbitrary array configuration and sensor orientation, which can in turn be used with optimal MVDR beamforming weights to analyze array gain. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we present examples of signal, noise and array gain variability as a function of mismatch intensity. Our analysis suggests that vector sensor array gain performance is less sensitive to rotational than to positional perturbations in the regions of interest. Hydrophones and particle motion sensors have very different response and noise characteristics. For instance, particle motion sensors are more sensitive to nonacoustic, motion-induced noise than hydrophones. In a towed line array configuration, those sensors orthogonal to the direction of motion are exposed to higher intensities of flow noise at low frequencies than those coincident to the array axis. Similarly, different dipole sensors may be exposed to varying degrees of rotational mismatch. Sensors may also rest on the seafloor, creating asymmetries. Recognizing these practical issues, we derive a new adaptive processing method customized to the unique characteristics of vector sensors and robust to mismatch and finite sample support. This new approach involves using multiple white noise gain constraints. During the past couple of decades, stationary vector sensor arrays have been built and tested, demonstrating improved gain and ambiguity lobe attenuation. Up until recently, however, very few towed vector sensor arrays had been built and tested. As such, many of the advantages of vector sensor arrays had only previously been shown in theory and/or with stationary arrays. We present results from sea trials in Monterey Bay, CA (2006) and Dabob Bay, WA (2007) towing a relatively short vector sensor array. Results highlight several of the distinct practical advantages of vector sensor arrays: resolution of spatial ambiguity (e.g., port/starboard and conical ambiguity), the ability to "undersample" an acoustic wave without spatial aliasing, quiet target recovery via clutter reduction, immunity to mismatch, improved array gain and enhanced detection performance. Thesis Supervisor: Arthur B. Baggeroer Title: Ford Professor of Engineering Secretary of the Navy/Chief of Naval Operations Chair for Ocean Sciences

[1]  Jian Li,et al.  On robust Capon beamforming and diagonal loading , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  Space/Time Random Processes and Optimum Array Processing , 1976 .

[3]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Spatial correlation of surface generated noise in a stratified ocean , 1980 .

[4]  A.B. Baggeroer,et al.  Robust adaptive vector sensor processing in the presence of mismatch and finite sample support , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop.

[5]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Wideband source localization using a distributed acoustic vector-sensor array , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  H. Cox Resolving power and sensitivity to mismatch of optimum array processors , 1973 .

[7]  W. Hodgkiss,et al.  Energetics of the deep ocean’s infrasonic sound field , 1991 .

[8]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Beamformer performance with acoustic vector sensors in air. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. C. Shipps,et al.  A miniature vector sensor for line array applications , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[10]  H. Cox,et al.  Endfire Supergain with a Uniform Line Array of Pressure and Velocity Sensors , 2006, 2006 Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[11]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Computational Ocean Acoustics , 1994 .

[12]  M. Hawkes,et al.  Hull-mounted acoustic vector-sensor processing , 1995, Conference Record of The Twenty-Ninth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[13]  Henry Cox,et al.  Practical supergain , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[14]  Hung Lai Optimum and adaptive processing of acoustic vector and higher-order sensors , 2008 .

[15]  W A Kuperman,et al.  Matched-field processing, geoacoustic inversion, and source signature recovery of blue whale vocalizations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  James A. McConnell Highly directional receivers using various combinations of scalar, vector, and dyadic sensors , 2003 .

[17]  A. Nehorai,et al.  Surface-mounted acoustic vector-sensor array processing , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[18]  H. Cox Spatial correlation in arbitrary noise fields with application to ambient sea noise , 1973 .

[19]  Jonathan Paul Kitchens Acoustic vector-sensor array performance , 2008 .

[20]  F. Desharnais,et al.  Acoustic intensity measurements with Swallow floats , 1994 .

[21]  H.-W. Chen,et al.  Wideband MVDR beamforming for acoustic vector sensor linear array , 2004 .

[22]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Performance analysis of two direction estimation algorithms using an acoustic vector sensor , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[23]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Vector-sensor array processing for electromagnetic source localization , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  D. Trivett,et al.  ARAP - Deep Ocean Vector Sensor Research Array , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[25]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Effects of sensor placement on acoustic vector-sensor array performance , 1999 .

[26]  J. W. Silverstein,et al.  Fundamental Limit of Sample Eigenvalue based Detection of Signals in Colored Noise using Relatively Few Samples , 2007, 2007 Conference Record of the Forty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[27]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor beamforming and Capon direction estimation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[28]  J. F. Lindberg,et al.  Acoustic Particle Velocity Sensors: Design, Performance, and Applications Proceedings , 1996 .

[29]  Henry Cox,et al.  Performance of vector sensors in noise , 2003 .

[30]  T. McDonald,et al.  Directional frequency and recording (DIFAR) sensors in seafloor recorders to locate calling bowhead whales during their fall migration. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  T. Moon,et al.  Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing , 1999 .

[32]  D. A. Abraham,et al.  Beamforming With Dominant Mode Rejection , 1990, Conference Proceedings on Engineering in the Ocean Environment.

[33]  Henry Cox,et al.  Robust adaptive beamforming , 2005, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[34]  Dennis Lindwall,et al.  Imaging marine geophysical environments with vector acoustics. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Ralph S. Woollett,et al.  Diffraction constants for pressure gradient transducers , 1982 .

[36]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector sensor array processing , 1992, [1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers.

[37]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor processing in the presence of a reflecting boundary , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[38]  Erhard Wielandt,et al.  Seismic Sensors and their Calibration , 2009 .

[39]  J.A. Clark,et al.  Localization of Radiating Sources along the Hull of a Submarine Using a Vector Sensor Array , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[40]  Energy Flow in Interference Fields , 2002 .

[41]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  The simultaneous measurement of infrasonic acoustic particle velocity and acoustic pressure in the ocean by freely drifting Swallow floats , 1991 .

[42]  Albert H. Nuttall,et al.  Directivity factors for linear arrays of velocity sensors , 2001 .

[43]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor correlations in ambient noise , 2001 .

[44]  Arnold Banner Simple velocity hydrophones for bioacoustic application , 1973 .

[45]  John G. Anderson Strong motion seismology , 1991 .

[46]  Gary R. Wilson,et al.  Vector sensors and vector sensor line arrays: Comments on optimal array gain and detection , 2006 .

[47]  R.D. Marciniak Unidirectional Underwater-Sound Pressure-Gradient Transducer , 1970, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[48]  Albert H Nuttall,et al.  Highly directional acoustic receivers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Henrik Schmidt,et al.  Estimation of surface noise source level from low‐frequency seismoacoustic ambient noise measurements , 1987 .

[50]  Gary W. Elko,et al.  Differential and gradient microphone arrays , 2003 .

[51]  K. Schittkowski,et al.  NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2022 .

[52]  J. Kendall,et al.  Hydrophone for Measuring Particle Velocity , 1956 .

[53]  B. A. Cray Directional point receivers: the sound and the theory , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[54]  Raj Rao Nadakuditi,et al.  Fundamental Limit of Sample Generalized Eigenvalue Based Detection of Signals in Noise Using Relatively Few Signal-Bearing and Noise-Only Samples , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[55]  G.L. Edmonds,et al.  Initial Analysis Of The Data From The Vertical DIFAR Array , 1992, OCEANS 92 Proceedings@m_Mastering the Oceans Through Technology.

[56]  E. Gilbert,et al.  Optimum design of directive antenna arrays subject to random variations , 1955 .

[57]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[58]  G. Gautschi Piezoelectric Sensorics: Force Strain Pressure Acceleration and Acoustic Emission Sensors Materials and Amplifiers , 2002 .

[59]  J.A. McConnell,et al.  Forming First-and Second-Order Cardioids with Multimode Hydrophones , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[60]  Roger T. Richards,et al.  Comparative beamforming studies employing acoustic vector sensor data , 2006 .

[61]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  Steering vector sensor array elements with linear cardioids and nonlinear hippioids. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  W.S. Hodgkiss,et al.  A Vertical Array Of Directional Acoustic Sensors , 1992, OCEANS 92 Proceedings@m_Mastering the Oceans Through Technology.

[63]  M. T. Silvia,et al.  A theoretical and experimental investigation of low-frequency acoustic vector sensors , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.