News Verification by Exploiting Conflicting Social Viewpoints in Microblogs

Fake news spreading in social media severely jeopardizes the veracity of online content. Fortunately, with the interactive and open features of microblogs, skeptical and opposing voices against fake news always arise along with it. The conflicting information, ignored by existing studies, is crucial for news verification. In this paper, we take advantage of this "wisdom of crowds" information to improve news verification by mining conflicting viewpoints in microblogs. First, we discover conflicting viewpoints in news tweets with a topic model method. Based on identified tweets' viewpoints, we then build a credibility propagation network of tweets linked with supporting or opposing relations. Finally, with iterative deduction, the credibility propagation on the network generates the final evaluation result for news. Experiments conducted on a real-world data set show that the news verification performance of our approach significantly outperforms those of the baseline approaches.

[1]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Information credibility on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[2]  Kenny Q. Zhu,et al.  False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structures , 2015, 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering.

[3]  Hongyan Liu,et al.  Detecting Event Rumors on Sina Weibo Automatically , 2013, APWeb.

[4]  Dan Roth,et al.  Content-driven trust propagation framework , 2011, KDD.

[5]  Anupam Joshi,et al.  Faking Sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy , 2013, WWW.

[6]  Gregor Heinrich.  Parameter estimation for text analysis , 2009 .

[7]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Dissimilarity in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Classification , 2007, AISTATS.

[8]  Yongdong Zhang,et al.  News Credibility Evaluation on Microblog with a Hierarchical Propagation Model , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[9]  Xiaoxin Yin,et al.  Semi-supervised truth discovery , 2011, WWW.

[10]  Fan Yang,et al.  Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo , 2012, MDS '12.

[11]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Truth Discovery with Multiple Conflicting Information Providers on the Web , 2008, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[13]  Soo-Min Kim,et al.  Crystal: Analyzing Predictive Opinions on the Web , 2007, EMNLP.

[14]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? , 2010, SOMA '10.

[15]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with Local and Global Consistency , 2003, NIPS.

[17]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Evaluating Event Credibility on Twitter , 2012, SDM.

[18]  Qiaozhu Mei,et al.  Enquiring Minds: Early Detection of Rumors in Social Media from Enquiry Posts , 2015, WWW.

[19]  Junehwa Song,et al.  Contrasting Opposing Views of News Articles on Contentious Issues , 2011, ACL.

[20]  Kyomin Jung,et al.  Prominent Features of Rumor Propagation in Online Social Media , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining.

[21]  Matt Thomas,et al.  Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts , 2006, EMNLP.

[22]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  Mining Contentious Documents Using an Unsupervised Topic Model Based Approach , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[23]  Claire Cardie,et al.  Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 2001, p. 577–584. Constrained K-means Clustering with Background Knowledge , 2022 .