Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method

We have developed a new tensile strength method for assessing mucoadhesive properties of polymer gels utilising freshly excised porcine nasal mucosa and a texture analyser. In conjunction with this, we propose a method for interpreting the mucoadhesive properties that is based on reasoning about the locus of the failure of a mucoadhesive joint. This involves measuring the cohesiveness of the gel and the mucus layer, respectively, and comparing these results with those obtained from a mucoadhesion measurement. Linear polymers (sodium carboxymethylcellulose, poly(acrylic acid) and sodium hyaluronate) and a cross‐linked polymer (poly(acrylic acid)) were used as model polymers in this study. It was shown that the withdrawal speed of the probe should be low, about 0.1 mm s−1, and that a contact time of 2 min was sufficient. In the mucoadhesion measurements there was no dependence of the results on the contact time in the interval 2–20 min. The tensile work appeared to be more applicable than the fracture strength for interpreting mucoadhesive properties. Furthermore, it was concluded that the interpretation procedure offers a good basis by which to assess whether the measured tensile work reflects a cohesive failure of the gel or a true interaction of the gel with the mucus layer.

[1]  J. Robinson,et al.  Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  O. Camber,et al.  Nasal drug delivery--evaluation of an in vitro model using porcine nasal mucosa. , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[3]  J D Smart,et al.  A rheological examination of the mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: the effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. , 1998, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  D. Craig,et al.  A comparison of different in vitro methods for measuring mucoadhesive performance , 1997 .

[5]  David S. Jones,et al.  Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers , 1997 .

[6]  S. Rossi,et al.  Characterization of mucin interaction with three viscosity grades of sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Comparison between rheological and tensile testing , 1996 .

[7]  H. Zia,et al.  Bioadhesive and formulation parameters affecting nasal absorption , 1996 .

[8]  S. Mortazavi An in vitro assessment of mucus/mucoadhesive interactions , 1995 .

[9]  E. Mathiowitz,et al.  Bioadhesive microspheres. I: A novel electrobalance-based method to study adhesive interactions between individual microspheres and intestinal mucosa , 1995 .

[10]  S. Mortazavi,et al.  An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion , 1993 .

[11]  J. H. Price,et al.  Design of an apparatus incorporating a linear variable differential transformer for the measurement of type III bioadhesion to cervical tissue , 1992 .

[12]  Hugh R. Brown,et al.  Adhesion between polymers , 1991, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[13]  N. Peppas,et al.  BIOADHESIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED-RELEASE SYSTEMS. I. FRACTURE AND INTERPENETRATION ANALYSIS IN POLY(ACRYLIC ACID)-CONTAINING SYSTEMS , 1987 .

[14]  Nikolaos A. Peppas,et al.  Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues , 1985 .

[15]  H. Kammer Adhesion between polymers. Review , 1983 .

[16]  Corne Sj,et al.  Proceedings: A method for the quantitative estimation of gastric barrier mucus. , 1974 .

[17]  J. Calbó,et al.  A comparison of different , 2013 .

[18]  H. Hägerström,et al.  Evaluation of mucoadhesion for two polyelectrolyte gels in simulated physiological conditions using a rheological method. , 2000, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[19]  J. Smart THE ROLE OF WATER MOVEMENT AND POLYMER HYDRATION IN MUCOADHESION , 1999 .

[20]  S. Rossi,et al.  A RHEOLOGICAL APPROACH TO EXPLAIN THE MUCOADHESIVE BEHAVIOR OF POLYMER HYDROGELS , 1999 .

[21]  H. Sharma,et al.  An investigation of the parameters influencing the bioadhesive properties of Myverol 18-99/water gels. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[22]  N. Peppas,et al.  Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bioadhesive materials: a review. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[23]  M. Tobyn,et al.  Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion. I: Test conditions and instrumental parameters , 1995 .

[24]  S. Rossi,et al.  Rheological and tensile tests for the assessment of polymer-mucin interactions , 1994 .

[25]  J. Robinson,et al.  Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery , 1994 .

[26]  Kristoffer Almdal,et al.  Towards a phenomenological definition of the term ‘gel’ , 1993 .

[27]  C. Graffner,et al.  Investigation of the applicability of a tensile testing machine for measuring mucoadhesive strength. , 1992, Acta pharmaceutica Nordica.

[28]  P. Buri,et al.  Optimization of an ex vivo method for bioadhesion quantification , 1992 .

[29]  Claus-Michael Lehr,et al.  In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers , 1992 .

[30]  Nikolaos A. Peppas,et al.  Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects of Bioadhesive Systems for Drug Administration , 1988 .

[31]  S. H. Leung,et al.  Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure-property relationships. , 1988, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[32]  S. Ross‐Murphy,et al.  Fundamentals of Hydrogels and Gelation , 1986 .