Methodology for Assessment of Surface Defects in Undermatched Pipeline Girth Welds

The demand for subsea transport of highly corrosive constituents has noticeably increased in recent years. This has driven the requirement for high strength pipelines with enhanced corrosion resistance such as chromium stainless steel or bimetal pipes. The latter are carbon steel pipes with a corrosion resistant alloy lining. Reeling is a cost effective installation method for small to medium size subsea pipelines, up to 457.2 mm (18 in.) in diameter. However, plastic straining associated with reeling has an effect on weld defect acceptance criteria. The maximum acceptable defect sizes are typically developed using engineering critical assessment (ECA), based on the reference stress method, which requires that the weld metal is equal to or stronger than the parent metal in terms of the stress–strain curve. However, evenmatch/overmatch cannot always be achieved in the case of subsea stainless or bimetal pipelines. In this work, a parametric finite-element (FE) study was performed to assess the effect of weld metal undermatch on the crack driving force, expressed in terms of the crack tip opening displacement (CTOD). Subsequently, the fracture assessment methodology for reeled pipes was proposed, where the ECA as per BS7910 is first carried out. These acceptable defect sizes are then reduced, using an analytical formula developed in this work, to account for weld undermatch. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4029190]

[1]  M. M. K. Lee,et al.  J-estimation for semi-elliptical surface cracks in wide plates under direct tension , 1998 .

[2]  M. M. K. Lee,et al.  The effects of weld mismatch on J-integrals and Q-values for semi-elliptical surface flaws , 1999 .

[3]  Noel P. O’Dowd Applications of two parameter approaches in elastic-plastic fracture mechanics , 1995 .

[4]  C. Shih,et al.  Relationships between the J-integral and the crack opening displacement for stationary and extending cracks , 1981 .

[5]  Robert A. Ainsworth,et al.  Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects , 1987 .

[6]  Xinmiao Meng,et al.  The Effect of Strength Mis-Match on Mechanical Performance of Weld Joints , 1999 .

[7]  J. Q. Fu,et al.  Effect of cracked weld joint and yield strength dissimilarity on crack tip stress triaxiality , 1996 .

[8]  Uwe Zerbst,et al.  SINTAP defect assessment procedure for strength mis-matched structures , 2000 .

[9]  Y. W. Shi,et al.  Influence of strength matching and crack depth on fracture toughness of welded joints , 1995 .

[10]  Erling Østby Fracture Control – Offshore Pipelines JIP Proposal For Strain-based Fracture Assessment Procedure , 2007 .

[11]  Noel P. O’Dowd,et al.  Constraint in the failure assessment diagram approach for fracture assessment , 1995 .

[12]  Rudi Denys,et al.  J-integral analysis of heterogeneous mismatched girth welds in clamped single-edge notched tension specimens , 2014 .

[13]  Erling Østby Fracture Control — Offshore Pipelines: New Strain-Based Fracture Mechanics Equations Including the Effects of Biaxial Loading, Mismatch, and Misalignment , 2005 .

[14]  Tomasz Tkaczyk,et al.  Comparison of Crack Driving Force Estimation Schemes For Weld Defects In Reeled Pipelines , 2007 .

[15]  Yun‐Jae Kim,et al.  Strength mis-match effect on limit loads for circumferential surface cracked pipes , 2009 .

[16]  Tomasz Tkaczyk,et al.  Fracture Assessment Procedures for Steel Pipelines Using a Modified Reference Stress Solution , 2009 .