Low-Frequency Eddy-Current Testing for Detection of Subsurface Cracks in CF-188 Stub Flange

The vertical stub flanges on the CF-188 Hornet fighter aircraft are responsible for linking two vertical stabilizers to the fuselage. Repeated stresses due to dynamic loads on aircraft structure during flight may cause eyebrow cracks on the flange around fastener holes. Prevention of failure of the flange structure involves early detection before cracks grow to a critical length. Low-frequency eddy-current (LFEC) techniques have been applied to inspect thick conducting aircraft structures. However, in the case of the stub flange, LFEC is challenged by component geometry. In particular, the surface containing cracks is not parallel to the surface that is accessible for scanning. The bolts are perpendicular to the face with cracks but are almost at 85° to the scanning surface. A novel conical probe is designed to use the bolt as a core for the excitation (driver) coil, thereby increasing driving flux density, and to constrain probe positioning as it is swept around the bolt. Finite-element simulations are used to investigate influence of different parameters on LFEC impedance plane response. These include slope of the slanted surface, sample thickness, operating frequency, crack size, and edge effect for two different component edge shapes. Experimental measurements carried out at different frequencies on test samples, prepared with the same dimensions as actual flanges, were found to be in good agreement with computational models. Results indicate that LFEC is significantly affected by surrounding geometries, which therefore, need to be taken into account when inspecting for cracks.

[1]  Thomas W. Krause,et al.  Pulsed Eddy Current Inspection of Wall Loss in Steam Generator Trefoil Broach Supports , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[2]  Thomas W. Krause,et al.  Enhancing Probability of Detection and Analysis of Bolt Hole Eddy Current , 2011 .

[3]  J. Bowler,et al.  Four-point probe measurements of a direct current potential drop on layered conductive cylinders , 2012 .

[4]  John C. Aldrin,et al.  Computational methods in eddy current crack detection at fastener sites in multi-layer structures , 2009 .

[5]  Nelson Sadowski,et al.  Magnetic materials and 3D finite element modeling , 2016 .

[7]  Ahmed N. Abdalla,et al.  Review on system development in eddy current testing and technique for defect classification and characterization , 2017, IET Circuits Devices Syst..

[8]  Zbigniew Usarek,et al.  Finite Element Method Applied in Electromagnetic NDTE: A Review , 2016 .

[9]  J. Bastos,et al.  Electromagnetic Modeling by Finite Element Methods , 2003 .

[10]  P. R. Underhill,et al.  Finite Element Model study of the Effect of Corner Rounding on Detectability of Corner Cracks using Bolt-Hole Eddy Current , 2017 .

[11]  Javier García-Martín,et al.  Non-Destructive Techniques Based on Eddy Current Testing , 2011, Sensors.

[12]  Marek Ziolkowski,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Nondestructive Testing Eddy Current Problems With Moving Parts , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  C. E. Baum,et al.  Field-containing inductors , 1988 .

[14]  Anders Rosell Finite Element Modelling of Eddy Current Non-Destructive Evaluation in Probability of Detection Studies , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas W. Krause,et al.  Real Time Pulsed Eddy Current Detection of Cracks in F/A-18 Inner Wing Spar Using Discriminant Separation of Modified Principal Components Analysis Scores , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[16]  Nathan Ida Eddy current nondestructive evaluation — The challenge of accurate modeling , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Development and Application Systems (DAS).

[17]  Naming Zhang,et al.  Study on planar coil with multi-frequency stimulations applied to an eddy current non-destructive testing , 2017, 2017 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS).