The transferability of hydrological models under nonstationary climatic conditions

This paper investigates issues involved in calibrating hydrological models against observed data when the aim of the modelling is to predict future runoff under different climatic conditions. To achieve this objective, we tested two hydrological models, DWBM and SIMHYD, using data from 30 unimpaired catchments in Australia which had at least 60 yr of daily precipitation, potential evapotranspiration (PET), and streamflow data. Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), modified index of agreement ( d 1 ) and water balance error (WBE) were used as performance criteria. We used a differential split-sample test to split up the data into 120 sub-periods and 4 different climatic sub-periods in order to assess how well the calibrated model could be transferred different periods. For each catchment, the models were calibrated for one sub-period and validated on the other three. Monte Carlo simulation was used to explore parameter stability compared to historic climatic variability. The chi-square test was used to measure the relationship between the distribution of the parameters and hydroclimatic variability. The results showed that the performance of the two hydrological models differed and depended on the model calibration. We found that if a hydrological model is set up to simulate runoff for a wet climate scenario then it should be calibrated on a wet segment of the historic record, and similarly a dry segment should be used for a dry climate scenario. The Monte Carlo simulation provides an effective and pragmatic approach to explore uncertainty and equifinality in hydrological model parameters. Some parameters of the hydrological models are shown to be significantly more sensitive to the choice of calibration periods. Our findings support the idea that when using conceptual hydrological models to assess future climate change impacts, a differential split-sample test and Monte Carlo simulation should be used to quantify uncertainties due to parameter instability and non-uniqueness.

[1]  J. Vaze,et al.  Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method , 2009 .

[2]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[3]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[4]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate – accounting for changing watershed behavior , 2011 .

[5]  A. Sankarasubramanian,et al.  Hydroclimatology of the continental United States , 2003 .

[6]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark , 2003 .

[7]  P. Reed,et al.  Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient , 2008 .

[8]  Jin Teng,et al.  Climate non-stationarity – Validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studies , 2010 .

[9]  D. B. Boorman,et al.  RECOGNISING THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE QUANTIFICATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE , 1997 .

[10]  Thibault Mathevet,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Hess Opinions " Crash Tests for a Standardized Evaluation of Hydrological Models " , 2022 .

[11]  R. Lidén,et al.  Analysis of conceptual rainfall–runoff modelling performance in different climates , 2000 .

[12]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[13]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment , 2005 .

[14]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Effect of high-resolution spatial soil moisture variability on simulated runoff response using a distributed hydrologic model , 2011 .

[15]  K. Hennessy,et al.  Climate data for hydrologic scenario modelling across the Murray-Darling Basin , 2008 .

[16]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Modelling the hydrological cycle in assessments of climate change , 1992, Nature.

[17]  Enoch M. Dlamini,et al.  Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling , 1997 .

[18]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world , 2010 .

[19]  V. Singh,et al.  Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD , 2002 .

[20]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[21]  I. Calder.  Water use by forests, limits and controls. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[22]  Eric Servat,et al.  Study of parameter stability of a lumped hydrologic model in a context of climatic variability , 2003 .

[23]  Victor Koren,et al.  Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data , 2004 .

[24]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Use of Remotely Sensed Actual Evapotranspiration to Improve Rainfall–Runoff Modeling in Southeast Australia , 2009 .

[25]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure , 1999 .

[26]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Construction, Calibration And Validation of Hydrological Models , 1990 .

[27]  T. McMahon,et al.  The impact of land use change on catchment hydrology in large catchments: The Comet River, Central Queensland, Australia , 2006 .

[28]  R. Leuning,et al.  Estimating catchment evaporation and runoff using MODIS leaf area index and the Penman‐Monteith equation , 2008 .

[29]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[30]  John O. Carter,et al.  Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  T. Meixner.  Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology: Observations and Modelling , 2002 .

[32]  R. Leconte,et al.  Uncertainty of the impact of climate change on the hydrology of a nordic watershed , 2008 .

[33]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Reliability of Model Predictions Outside Calibration Conditions , 2003 .

[34]  H. Wheater,et al.  The significance of spatial rainfall representation for flood runoff estimation : A numerical evaluation based on the Lee catchment, UK , 2006 .

[35]  M. Raupach,et al.  Balances of Water, Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Australian Landscapes: (2) Model Formulation and Testing , 2001 .

[36]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Model performance and parameter behavior for varying time aggregations and evaluation criteria in the WASMOD‐M global water balance model , 2009 .

[37]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A 'User-Friendly' approach to parameter estimation in hydrologic models , 2006 .

[38]  Keith Beven,et al.  Using internal catchment information to reduce the uncertainty of discharge and baseflow predictions , 2007 .

[39]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[40]  Kieran M. O'Connor,et al.  Comparative assessment of six automatic optimization techniques for calibration of a conceptual rainfall—runoff model , 2007 .

[41]  M. Budyko,et al.  Heat balance of the Earth , 1964 .

[42]  Francis H. S. Chiew,et al.  Simulation of the impacts of climate change on runoff and soil moisture in Australian catchments , 1995 .

[43]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[44]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Operational testing of a water balance model for predicting climate change impacts , 1999 .

[45]  M. Budyko.  The heat balance of the earth's surface , 1958 .

[46]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[47]  Michael R. Raupach,et al.  Equilibrium Evaporation and the Convective Boundary Layer , 2000, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[48]  A. Roy,et al.  Impact of climate change on the hydrology of St. Lawrence tributaries , 2010 .

[49]  T. McMahon,et al.  Application of the daily rainfall-runoff model MODHYDROLOG to 28 Australian catchments , 1994 .

[50]  T. McMahon,et al.  Global ENSO-streamflow teleconnection, streamflow forecasting and interannual variability , 2002 .

[51]  Quanxi Shao,et al.  Water balance modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko framework – Model development and testing , 2008 .

[52]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[53]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses , 2011 .

[54]  C. Perrin,et al.  Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall—runoff models , 2007 .