Improved molecular laboratory productivity by consolidation of testing on the new random-access analyzer Alinity m

Abstract Objectives Automated molecular analyzers have accelerated diagnosis, allowing earlier intervention and better patient follow-up. A recently developed completely automated molecular analyzer, Alinity™ m (Abbott), offers consolidated, continuous, and random-access testing that may improve molecular laboratory workflow. Methods An international, multicenter study compared laboratory workflow metrics across various routine analyzers and Alinity m utilizing assays for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV), and sexually transmitted infection (STI) (Chlamydia trachomatis [CT]/Neisseria gonorrhoeae [NG]/Trichomonas vaginalis [TV]/Mycoplasma genitalium [MG]). Three turnaround times (TATs) were assessed: total TAT (sample arrival to result), sample onboard TAT (sample loading and test starting to result), and processing TAT (sample aspiration to result). Results Total TAT was reduced from days with routine analyzers to hours with Alinity m, independent of requested assays. Sample onboard TATs for standard workflow using routine analyzers ranged from 7 to 32.5 h compared to 2.75–6 h for Alinity m. The mean sample onboard TAT for STAT samples on Alinity m was 2.36 h (±0.19 h). Processing TATs for Alinity m were independent of the combination of assays, with 100% of results reported within 117 min. Conclusions The consolidated, continuous, random-access workflow of Alinity m reduces TATs across various assays and is expected to improve both laboratory operational efficiency and patient care.

[1]  L. May,et al.  Better Tests, Better Care: Improved Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases , 2013, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  E. Marlowe,et al.  High-volume workflow and performance comparisons for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing using automated molecular platforms , 2019, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[3]  Wendy Stevens,et al.  Evaluation of the Abbott m2000 RealTime Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Assay for HIV Load Monitoring in South Africa Compared to the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas Amplicor, Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and BioMerieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 Assays , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  G. Burstein,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines , 2003, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[5]  J. Iredell,et al.  Rapid identification of pathogens using molecular techniques , 2015, Pathology.

[6]  M. Winkler,et al.  Evaluation of the new VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 1.0 Assay (kPCR) for quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA. , 2009, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[7]  Sam Ratnam,et al.  Workflow and Maintenance Characteristics of Five Automated Laboratory Instruments for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections , 2014, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  M. Obermeier,et al.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of alinity m HCV assay performance. , 2020, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[9]  C. Prégermain,et al.  Comparison of the Abbott Alinity m and m2000 assays for the quantification of HIV-1, HCV and HBV in clinical samples. , 2020, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[10]  M. Obermeier,et al.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of alinity m HBV assay performance. , 2020, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[11]  S. West,et al.  Comparison of the Abbott m2000 RealTime CT Assay and the Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG Assay to the Roche Amplicor CT Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Ocular Samples from Tanzania , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  M. Poljak,et al.  Alinity m HR HPV Assay Fulfills Criteria for Human Papillomavirus Test Requirements in Cervical Cancer Screening Settings , 2019, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  M. Obermeier,et al.  Multicenter clinical comparative evaluation of Alinity m HIV-1 assay performance. , 2020, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[14]  P Valenstein,et al.  Laboratory turnaround time. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[15]  A. Glass,et al.  Evaluation of the Alinity m HIV-1 assay for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load in a high-throughput molecular laboratory in South Africa. , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[16]  L. Katz,et al.  The cobas® 6800/8800 System: a new era of automation in molecular diagnostics , 2017, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[17]  E. Adamska,et al.  Evaluating the aptima HIV-1 quant Dx, HCV quant Dx and HBV quant assays against the Abbott HIV-1, HCV and HBV RealTime assays. , 2018, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[18]  C. Scagnolari,et al.  Consolidation of molecular testing in clinical virology , 2017, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[19]  F. Nolte Distributed Model for Molecular Diagnostics. , 2019, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  Gilbert Greub,et al.  Ten years of R&D and full automation in molecular diagnosis. , 2016, Future microbiology.