CT screening for lung cancer: implication of lung biopsy recommendations.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to address the implications of invasive diagnostic procedures recommended by a lung cancer screening protocol. In particular, we assess how many invasive procedures were recommended for benign nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2003 and 2009, 4782 high-risk current and former smokers were enrolled in a lung cancer screening study. A helical low-dose CT of the chest was performed. Morphologic features targeted were parenchymal nodules. The indication for biopsy was made according to the diagnostic algorithm provided by the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program. We recorded the time points of biopsy recommendation; shape, size, and growth of nodules; types of diagnostic procedures; complication rates; and final pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 128 diagnostic biopsies were recommended for suspicious nodules, and 127 biopsies were performed, including 110 percutaneous CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs), nine video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resections, seven bronchoscopies, and one ultrasound-guided biopsy of a lymph node. Of 110 FNABs, 24 had unsatisfactory results, 13 of which were referred for secondary diagnostic VATS resection. The indication for biopsy was made on the basis of shape in 48% of cases (62/128), growth on follow-up in 40% of cases (51/128), and the appearance of new nodules in 12% of cases (15/128). In total, 104 of 124 biopsies (84%) were correctly indicated (true-positive recommendation) for malignancy, 20 were benign (false-positive) (16%), and final results are pending for four cases. The overall false-positive recommendation rate was 0.42% (20/4782); 11.6% of FNABs (16/128) and 3.6% of VATS (5/128) revealed benign nodules, corresponding to an overall false-positive rate of 0.33% for FNAB (16/4782) and 0.10% for VATS (5/4782). CONCLUSION The recommended biopsy procedures for screen-detected suspicious pulmonary nodules resulted in a low intervention rate for benign nodules. This rate is minimal when we followed a research protocol that relies on shape and growth.

[1]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Four-Year Results of Low-Dose CT Screening and Nodule Management in the ITALUNG Trial , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[2]  L. Dominioni,et al.  Peri-operative complications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). , 2008, International journal of surgery.

[3]  J. Habbema,et al.  Risk‐based selection from the general population in a screening trial: Selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch‐Belgian randomised lung cancer multi‐slice CT screening trial (NELSON) , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[4]  S. Sestini,et al.  eComment. Positron emission tomography reduces the incidence of surgery for non-malignant conditions in lung cancer screening programmes. , 2013, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[5]  Paul Pinsky,et al.  Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. , 2004, Chest.

[6]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Cumulative Incidence of False-Positive Test Results in Lung Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial , 2011 .

[7]  D. Lynch,et al.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. , 2011, Radiology.

[8]  Heidi Roberts,et al.  Screening High-Risk Populations for Lung Cancer: Guideline Recommendations , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[9]  K. Doi,et al.  Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  David M. Hansell,et al.  Incidentally detected small pulmonary nodules on CT. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[12]  M. L. R. D. Christenson.  Perifissural Nodules Seen at CT Screening for Lung Cancer , 2011 .

[13]  N. Müller,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1991, Radiology.

[14]  S Sone,et al.  Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  T. McLoud,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Survival of Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer Detected on CT Screening , 2008 .

[17]  T. Roberts,et al.  Computed Tomography Perfusion Using First Pass Methods for Lung Nodule Characterization , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[18]  G. Pelosi,et al.  Difficulties encountered managing nodules detected during a computed tomography lung cancer screening program. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  M. Roizen.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[20]  G. Trovato,et al.  Optimization of thoracic US guidance for lung nodule biopsy. , 2014, Radiology.

[21]  M. Chung,et al.  Solitary Pulmonary Nodule : Characterization with Combined Wash-in and Washout Features at Dynamic Multi – Detector Row CT 1 , 2005 .

[22]  J. Field,et al.  Early detection of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: an update on recently presented data , 2012 .

[23]  Hajime Nakata,et al.  Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. , 2002, Chest.

[24]  V. Roggli,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: Part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  L. Tanoue.  CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Five-year Prospective Experience , 2007 .

[26]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Five-year Lung Cancer Screening Experience: CT Appearance, Growth Rate, Location, and Histologic Features of 61 Lung Cancers , 2008 .

[27]  H Nakata,et al.  Lung cancer screening using low dose spiral CT , 2000 .

[28]  H. Roberts,et al.  CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules measuring 10 mm or less. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[29]  N. Paul,et al.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: Canadian experience. , 2007, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[30]  David O Wilson,et al.  The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS): outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[31]  F. Fazio,et al.  Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results , 2003, The Lancet.

[32]  S. Swensen,et al.  Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[33]  A. Dirksen,et al.  The Danish Randomized Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial—Overall Design and Results of the Prevalence Round , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[34]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  C. Begg,et al.  Computed Tomography Screening and Lung Cancer Outcomes , 2008 .

[36]  P. Kvale,et al.  Diagnostic procedures after a positive spiral computed tomography lung carcinoma screen , 2005, Cancer.

[37]  W Weiss,et al.  Peripheral measurable bronchogenic carcinoma. Growth rate and period of risk after therapy. , 1971, The American review of respiratory disease.

[38]  A. Sakurada,et al.  Tumor doubling time and prognostic assessment of patients with primary lung cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[39]  Ruth C Carlos,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy. , 2008, Radiology.

[40]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[41]  Alexander McGregor,et al.  Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience. , 2010, Lung cancer.